One of the new phenomenon of discrete racism with a colorblind overtone are disclaimer statements predominantly used by white people before or after voicing questionable comments during racial discussions. These statements roughly contain phrases such as “I’m not racist” or “prejudiced” or “biased.” They have become common accompaniment to racially charged if not racist opinions. While responding to a DAS researcher’s question, Rhonda, a part-time employee in a jewelry story in her sixties, says “I’m [not] prejudice or racist or whatever. They’re always given the smut jobs because they would do it. Then they stopped, they stopped doing [them]. The welfare system got to be very, very easy.” (Bonilla-Silva cit DAS research, 1997). Another perspective
…show more content…
Without even touching on the implementation and practical influence of Affirmative Action, most of the white people who were involved on such research as the DAS and several colleges, particularly those who claim colorblindness are strongly against its core concept. This is often times because they believe everyone should be given equal chances and giving people of color more would be ‘unfair’ to whites. However, color blindness shatters as whites get upset at the idea of a person of color getting something instead of them, while they choose to ignore the same thing that happens in reverse. Are all the condemners of Affirmative action not of the minority …show more content…
“Whereas in slavery and Jim Crow, blacks had to be “stage Negroes” if they wanted to survive, as a consequence of new norms, whites now have to be “stage whites.”” Dr. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva writes in Racism Without Racists. This change in dinamicas has caused many White people who want to voice their discriminatory views without sounding racist to hide behind the ambiguity and dismissive capacity of colorblindness.
Regardless of the fact that Affirmative Action has problems of assertion and implementation, those who claim colorblindness are strongly against even the concept because they believe everyone should be given equal chances and giving people of color more would be ‘unfair’ to whites. However, color blindness shatters as whites get upset at the idea of a person of color getting something instead of them, while they choose to ignore the same thing that happens in
Without even touching on the implementation and practical influence of Affirmative Action, most of the white people who were involved on such research as the DAS and several colleges, particularly those who claim colorblindness are strongly against its core concept. This is often times because they believe everyone should be given equal chances and giving people of color more would be ‘unfair’ to whites. However, color blindness shatters as whites get upset at the idea of a person of color getting something instead of them, while they choose to ignore the same thing that happens in reverse. Are all the condemners of Affirmative action not of the minority …show more content…
“Whereas in slavery and Jim Crow, blacks had to be “stage Negroes” if they wanted to survive, as a consequence of new norms, whites now have to be “stage whites.”” Dr. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva writes in Racism Without Racists. This change in dinamicas has caused many White people who want to voice their discriminatory views without sounding racist to hide behind the ambiguity and dismissive capacity of colorblindness.
Regardless of the fact that Affirmative Action has problems of assertion and implementation, those who claim colorblindness are strongly against even the concept because they believe everyone should be given equal chances and giving people of color more would be ‘unfair’ to whites. However, color blindness shatters as whites get upset at the idea of a person of color getting something instead of them, while they choose to ignore the same thing that happens in