Hughes’s piece “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain” (1926) which rejects artistic, systematic, and societal conventions and promotes the beauty of blackness and the importance of existing as an artist within the scope of being black, was published not only as a response to George Schuyler’s dismissal of the need for black art and the existence of the need to express vastly different human experiences through art because of one’s race, but to Du Bois’ slightly oppressive standards of art. Hughes was upset by the lack of advocacy for the “New Negroes,” the next generation, the youth, and in “The New Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain” he substantiates his beliefs with poetic, manifesto-like writing that is intended to empower and inspire the young Negro
Hughes’s piece “The Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain” (1926) which rejects artistic, systematic, and societal conventions and promotes the beauty of blackness and the importance of existing as an artist within the scope of being black, was published not only as a response to George Schuyler’s dismissal of the need for black art and the existence of the need to express vastly different human experiences through art because of one’s race, but to Du Bois’ slightly oppressive standards of art. Hughes was upset by the lack of advocacy for the “New Negroes,” the next generation, the youth, and in “The New Negro Artist and the Racial Mountain” he substantiates his beliefs with poetic, manifesto-like writing that is intended to empower and inspire the young Negro