Negative Effects Of Nuclear Power

Decent Essays
The Negative Effects of Nuclear Power Plants
Each year,” enormous quantities of radioactive waste are created during the nuclear fuel process”(http://www.psr.org), with the effect of killing many organisms, and damaging the environment. Also, from past nuclear accidents, the world has learned how devastating the possibility of a nuclear accident can be, proving why the nuclear power plants should be banned. The source of energy that would replace these harmful machines would be wind power, hydropower, and the process of concentrating solar thermal power. With all the possible solutions to nuclear power plants, the world should take action and slowly generate the transition to a safe and reliable source of energy. Clearly, the use of nuclear
…show more content…
There are two ways that nuclear power plants kill aquatic life: the intake of water and the discharge of water. “The intake of water traps aquatic life in the cooling system. The cooling system is installed with a filter to prevent large objects or fish from getting pulled into the system. Some small aquatic life fit through the filters and are killed once they enter the cooling system. Other aquatic life becomes trapped in the filters.” (www.gracelinks.org) Nuclear power plants need water in order for cooling. In the first processes of taking in water, organisms are killed because of the foolish way of filtering all organisms out of the water. Unlucky small creatures get sucked into the water that is used for the power plants which results in death. Also, when power plants release water, the temperature is extremely different to where it is released, which also results in death to the near organisms.”These “thermoelectric” G power plants boil water to produce high-pressure steam that turns turbines, producing electricity. The steam is then cooled by a condenser which typically uses water drawn in from a nearby lake, river or estuary. In a once-through cooling system the cooling water is not reused, instead it is discharged at a higher temperature back into the water body from which it was withdrawn. To continue cooling steam, the power plant must constantly withdraw enormous amounts of …show more content…
The best possible solution is to reduce the world’s dependence on nonrenewable resources, and to improve overall conservation efforts. “Much of the industrial age was created using fossil fuels, but there is also known technology that uses other types of renewable energies – such as steam, solar and wind. The major concern isn’t so much that we will run out of gas or oil, but that the use of coal is going to continue to pollute the atmosphere and destroy other natural resources in the process of mining the coal that it has to be replaced as an energy source. This isn’t easy as many of the leading industries use coal, not gas or oil, as their primary source of power for manufacturing.”(conserve-energy-future.) This means the world has to switch to renewable sources of energy such as hydropower, wind power, and the process of concentrating solar power to energy. Hydropower is a form of renewable energy that uses the water stored in dams, as well as flowing in rivers to create electricity in hydropower plants. Next there is wind power. This power source makes electricity by harnessing the energy of the wind. One other source

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a passage that lays out all of the main components of Nuclear energy. It is filled with statistics and real world examples, including visual aids. The major purpose of this text is to inform the reader that nuclear power is in fact a beneficial form of energy. Three images on page 18 show nuclear power in action.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Atlantic Sturgeon

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Intakes for dams and nuclear power plants also kill billions of fish and organisms every year. For example, the Salem Nuclear Power Plant in southern New Jersey has said that their facility alone kills three billion fish and other organisms annually. Eggs and smaller fish get sucked in and shredded, and juveniles and adults are crushed against the intake screens. Converting to a closed-loop system by which river water is re-circulated and cooled by towers would reduce fish mortality by about 95 percent. But this would probably cost $400 to $800 million, and PSEG or Public Service Enterprise Group does not want to make this investment.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Population is growing and they need electric to stay in contact, building a nuclear plant must be involved but in a way that help society, because nuclear can help environment to clean up from pollutants and also will stop us using coal, however, coal will finish in future, while energy can’t destroy it or remove it. (Mizuo…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Topic: Nuclear Energy Thesis: While nuclear energy has many benefits, the negative implications must be considered. " Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know. "…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It's easy to think that nuclear power plants are a great benefit for the united states because it will has smaller carbon footprints, it will help with air pollution however, if a nuclear accident were to happen air pollution wouldn't be the problem, radiation would be the problem. This would mean that people would not be able to survive in that area and would need to evacuate. This is worse than any other problem. To wrap it all up nuclear power is not reliable and shouldn’t be passed in the united states because it takes a long time, nuclear accidents , and it attracts…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying “No” to Nuclear Power As of 2003, 49,000 metric tons of nuclear waste has been produced in the United States alone. Every day, more and more of this incredibly dangerous substance is released into our planet’s soil. Nuclear power seems like a good idea on the surface, but obviously, it is not the answer. Nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, and unable to be contained, therefore it should not be the world’s primary source of energy.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Uranium Pros And Cons

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We know that nuclear bombs are the most deadly weapon on the face of the earth, but there is a positive way to use the uranium. We use uranium in our nuclear energy reactors to provide a clean energy for our power grids. “America’s 99 nuclear power plants generate almost 20 percent of the nation’s electricity while emitting no carbon dioxide or controlled pollutants’’ stated in the article “How Nuclear Reactors Work” in 2017. It is important to know how nuclear reactors work and how harmless the production of nuclear energy is. Nuclear energy is simple.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These power plants supply about one-fifth (20%) of the United States electricity since the 1990’s. There are incidents when accidents involving nuclear reactors can occur. With these accidents, they can lead to substantial unplanned radiation exposure for humans and the environment (Sherer, Visconti, Ritenour, & Haynes, 2014, p.27). Nuclear power plants first must be built, in preference near a body of water. With this, the area will need to be cleared, which disturbs the natural habitat of the creatures that live there leading to the gradual upset of the ecological balance of the region.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overview A 9.0 magnitude earthquake began on March 11th, 2011 at 2:46 PM and lasted 3 minutes (World Nuclear Association, 2016). The earthquake was centered 130 km off the shore of Sendai Myagi on the east coast of Honshu Island. Consequentially, the island to move four meters to the east and surrounding coastlines were subsided by up to one meter. The earthquake also created a tsunami reaching as high as 40 meters.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear power plant use fission to produce very large amounts of energy. Enough to provide most of the world with electricity. It may sound like a great method, but it has many downfalls such as production of radiation that has been proven to cause cancer and death of wildlife. In my opinion nuclear power plants should not be…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear Option good or not for humans In this article, Will Ripley, Junko Ogura and James Griffiths discuss the Fukushima: Five years after Japan 's worst nuclear disaster with three parts. As we know on March 11, 2011, an earthquake and tsunami of unprecedented led to major problems at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Operating reactors shut down automatically, with control rods inserting into the reactor cores. A 14meter high tsunami triggered by the earthquake disabled all AC power to Units 1, 2, and 3 of the Power Plant, and carried off fuel tanks for emergency diesel generators.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear power plants may be the best answer to solve water shortages, as well as reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses directly caused by fossil fuel-burning desalination facilities. The use of a nuclear power plant, coupled with a desalination facility is not revolutionary technology. In fact, a report as of 2007 by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has determined that, “over 175 reactor-years of operating experience on nuclear desalination have been accumulated worldwide” (5 Nisan). With so many years of experience, there is no doubt about the safety and sensibility of nuclear desalination. However, these years of experience have mainly been accumulated in Kazakhstan, India, and Japan (Nuclear).…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year our planet comes into contact with multiple large scale pollution disasters which continue to lead us to our inevitable demise if we don’t change something. Right now, our lives are fueled mostly by Coal, and Oil which create large disasters. Pollutants from these disasters flood into our oceans killing millions of fish, and other sea creatures. The pollutants also get into our air which cause smog in many cities, which can lead to death amongst thousands of small children. The time is now to switch to an alternate source of electricity that is required to save our planet.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was the biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, and nothing could have been done to prevent it, as there is no stopping nature. Then, in any extreme natural event, there is a risk of damage to a plant 's structure or contents, which could easily result in a release of contaminants. Nuclear energy has immense power, and it 's not surprising that that power can be harvested in a detrimental way. There is no remedy for the effects of radiation, which can cause cancer, genetic mutations, and a drastically shorter life expectancy. Given this, nuclear power plants are a prime target for acts of terrorism.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays