Cosmetic Animal Testing

Better Essays
Tens of thousands of animals are tested on for the cosmetic industry every year. (Pro-Con) However, this cannot be accurate due to some animals not being protected -therefore unaccounted for in these numbers- by law: “95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA)” (Hastings Center) . The reasons vary for this; one of the most common excuses is for the benefit of humans who should be kept safe from faulty products. Such products range from medical to cosmetic use and everything in between. The testing on animals -although not well documented- has been around since long before the 1860s. Cruelty Free Kitty believes it’s possible to shop for exclusively cruelty free cosmetics. The Humane Society believes …show more content…
The possible answer is that animals are close to humans in the sense that they are living and have eyes and noses and skin, but people and animals have different reactions when it comes to chemicals. In “5 Ways Animal Testing Hurts Humans” Dr. Doctor Aysha Akhtar, M.D., M.P.H says “…there is more than 90 percent chance that the drug that tested safe and effective in animals will be ineffective or unsafe in you.” This is because animals -while having very similar DNA to humans- is still off by a few points that make a huge difference. This logic also works vice versa, where tests may have failed on an animal, they will not continue on, but just because it didn’t work for animals doesn’t mean it wouldn’t have worked on humans. Because of this, animals have been put through trials of pain for no reason while ingredients could be completely safe for humans if used in a responsible way, i.e.: not ingesting …show more content…
Consumers can buy from many big-name brands like Kat Von D, Jefree Star, and e.l.f. that do not test on animals. They can do this because the cosmetic industry has a large foundation of ingredients safe for human use from the tests conducted in previous years or simply because the company is vegan. This is can also be avoided by other companies that do test on animals because there are alternative methods. One method can be human conducted tests that would theoretically work better than animal tests. For example, people volunteer to test medications, and while there are risks, there are wavers to sign proving consent, the results are the most accurate to the targeted human consumers. This would be the same set up for testing the safety of cosmetics and it wouldn’t involve animals. However, there are other harm free solutions. For example, there is a new development of 3-D skin printing. The concept would be created “from incubated skin cells donated by surgery patients” (Business of Fashion). The skin would be from human cells and would be able to respond the same way to a cosmetic as if connected to a human. Another method would be in vitro, or in glass, treatment. In vitro is where human cells are tested with a chemical, such as hair dyes would be tested on hair follicle cells, to find a result without harm coming to a person or

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Facts

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Testing “Ninety-two percent of experimental drugs that are safe and effective on animals fail in human clinical trials because they don’t work or are dangerous” (“Animal Experimentation Facts”). This statistic shows animal testing is too inaccurate to be used and animals are not the same as humans. Even though animals are much different than humans, there are people who think testing drugs on the animals the right thing. When a scientist is testing a new drug they will inject the animals; such as rats, fish, monkeys, etc. ; with diseases they wouldn’t naturally get and then giving them the certain drug they are testing for.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They may think that because animal testing has been around for so many years that there is no other way that we can still continue to make products safe for humans. Yet again, they are wrong. With today’s science there are some alternatives that scientists can take to end the usage of animals for their experimentation. Most of the time the products that are harmful to animals are still put on the market for people to purchase, so there was no reasoning to test the product on the animal. Alongside from that, even if the chemical is safe by “animal standards”, there is still only an 8% chance that it is safe for humans, which is very slim (Ericson).…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is also a 90% chance that the same makeup / skin care products failed the first test because of the harsh chemicals. Only 92% of the animals safety test are accurate according to www.understandinganimalresearch.org. Usually the product will pass the test on animals, then fail during the clinical trials. Animal testing is in no way useful anymore, so why do we think our product is unsafe because it wasn 't tested on an innocent animal. Lab animal enthusiasts are for the most part, not in favor of hurting animals intentionally but they think that there are major human health benefits but the truth is less than 2% of human illnesses (1.16%) are ever seen in animals.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Argument

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Ericson from Newsweek magazine, offers several facts and statistics on the treatment involved with animal testing. Ericson states, “Over 25 million animals [are] used for research annually.” However, ninety-two percent of the products that were tested on lab animals and were considered safe to the animals, fail in human testing, due to the lack of internal and external similarities between laboratory animal and humans (Ericson). This being the case, animal testing proves to be an ineffective way to determine toxicity on drugs and other products. Additionally, animal testing proves not only to be a waste of animals’ lives, but an insufficient waste of time and money. Writer Kay Peggs from the Oxford Centre of Animal ethics states that, “worldwide the industry [of animal experimentation] is worth US$300 billion, with an anticipated rise to US$400 billion within three years.” (Peggs) With statistics such as this, it only seems logical to use more reliable alternatives to test products rather than animal…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pain Of Animal Testing

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Unless the state or country prohibits the act of testing on animals then it becomes a personal decision. There are plenty of brands that do not test their products on animals, but in the end it is up to the consumer what products they buy. Just as it is up to the companies how much testing they think their products need. Animal testing has made many breakthroughs in science. Including new vaccines, treatments, and overall just ensuring the safety of a product before it is set out for the public.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although this is true, there is still the risk of a product working on animals and not on humans. Vlasak, a surgeon and leader of the North American Animal Liberation Press Office, says, “Half of the drugs that test as safe on animals turn out to not work or be safe in people, so you might as well flip a coin” (qtd. in Clemmitt 10). What is the point of testing on animals if there’s the risk of it not even working on humans? On a more moral based point, people of the opposing side think it’s alright to experiment on animals because they think animals are much more inferior to us.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Paper After decades of animal testing, most cosmetic companies have ruled out the ingredients that don 't benefit their products. With this knowledge, they are able to produce cosmetics with ingredients that are known to be safe for use. Animal testing should not be justified by our enjoyment of cosmetics. The torture and premature death that animals have to endure is inhuman because they have no choice, but cosmetic companies do have the option to take another route to test cosmetics. Other options include paying human volunteers to test the makeup, using the new computer programs that mimics human biology, and using human tissues and cells also known as Vitro Testing.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people believe that Animal experimentation has played a huge role in enabling people to discover, prevent and cure diseases. Many diseases were found and there were numerous advantageous results from the experiments. However, there is a problem with this reasoning because the drugs or medicine that are invented by animal experimentation can respond differently in humans. According to the statistics, 92 percent of all drugs that were guaranteed safe to be used for humans and that were effective in animals, failed in human bodies because they were dangerous and did not really work. ( Food and Drug Administration) Penicillin is a antibiotic agent which is commonly used in the treatment of bacterial infection.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Payton Keife Nick DiMeo English 101 11 November 2017 Is Animal Experimentation Inhumane? Animal experimentation is known and used worldwide; from testing beauty products to medication, thousands of animals are harmed daily by fumes and chemicals, leaving them traumatized. There are many other solutions determining if products are harmful or not, yet, they are rarely used. The use of animals during testing, should most likely be banned and throughout the world, because it has been proven to be less accurate and more harmful. Although animal testing is thought to be “life-saving”, it has also been categorized as inhumane and cruel.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Each year, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs are used for cosmetic testing in the United States alone (Abbott 144). Although the public is aware that some cosmetics are tested on animals, they are not cognizant of the sufferings that animals endure during cosmetic tests. Even if cosmetics are labeled “not tested on animals” or “cruelty free,” it does not mean that their ingredients were not tested on animals. Ingredient suppliers could have tested the ingredients before distributing them to cosmetics companies. Additionally, many people do not know that there are alternative testing methods.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays