The Negative Consequences Of The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
Hiroshima boom was the last important event before the end of the world war two. It happen after Japan attacks Pearl Harbor. Most people think that it was not enough reason for dropped an atomic boom in Japan. However other think that in war and in love all is fair. Hiroshima bomb has many bad consequences. However, I think that it has many good ones. The end of the war, the respect from the others country for win the war are the positive points. Besides, the negative consequences of the bomb are not as strong as the positive ones.
First of all, the Hiroshima bombs dictated the end for the world war two. This war had a duration of 6 years in that period of time more that 60 millions of people had died before the Hiroshima attack. In this attack
…show more content…
These people have the idea that the quantity of people that died for the explosion of the atomic bomb were unnecessary deaths. Also some has made some theories about new sickness that has been developed as a consequence of the atomic explosion none of these theories has any proof. For that reason until they discover the reality of these sickness these arguments has none value at all. The reasons that the other side emphasized the most is the one that said that many countries has developed their own atomic bomb after they saw the explosion of Hiroshima. I really think that the reason that theses countries have developed their own weapons in not consequence to the explosion. as a mater of fact, I really believes that these countries will develop the bombs just knowing that the USA has these weapons. What I mean is with or without the explosion most of the countries will know that the weapon exist and will paid whatever quantity of money to have the same or a better weapons that the USA. Thanks to the Hiroshima event the studies of size of the explosion help others countries to develop a weapon that would not be lethal for the world. None country want to destroy the world just has a weapon that might destroy a city or a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This was enough reason for the USSR not to demand joint occupation of Japan. In the other hand, used the bomb convinced the world of its horror, it has prevented its use in the future. Last, after this incident, it creates peace for the world. Even Japan have the ambitions, they did not have enough resource that can use for the other war.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    President Truman made the decision to drop an atomic bomb in Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945, hoping to end the war faster and to save lives. The war in the Pacific, including Iwo Jima was extremely bloody and cost many lives. A lot of things led to the bomb in Hiroshima including Manhattan project which was the making of the bomb and the bombing of the first bomb in Alamogordo. Many people suggested the atomic bomb with hopes of ending the war sooner and to save lives. However, many people also advised against using the bomb because it would kill thousands upon thousands.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Japanese lives were sacrificed simply for power politics between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. ”(Pro and Con of Dropping the Bomb). The lives of innocent Japanese citizens were lost due to the selfishness and carelessness of the United States and the Soviet Union. The U.S. decided to follow through with their destructive plans despite the thousands upon thousands of innocent lives that will be lost if the bomb is dropped.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In reality, through the analysis of the United States decision, including who advised against it, and the direct results of this choice, one can certainly determine that it was unnecessary and did more harm than good. The United States decision to drop the atomic bomb had, and continues to have, a significant negative impact on the people of Japan; effects that the American government was aware of prior to their decision. President Truman's decision has been debated by historians for years, and there has yet to be a…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Development of atomic power will provide the nations with new means of destruction. The atomic bombs…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On August 6 1945, a US plane named the Enola Gay flew over Hiroshima, a civilian city that had minimal military value and dropped the worlds first atomic bomb nicknamed little boy over Hiroshima, the initial blast instantly killed 80,000 people leaving Hiroshima a wasteland for months. This was a significant event of WW2 as it enlightened the world on why nuclear weapons shouldn’t be used in warfare. The use of an atomic bomb on Hiroshima in 1945 has long remained one of the most controversial decisions of the second world war, whether US president Harry S Truman was right to authorise these nuclear attacks against japan. The US objective in these bombing was to minimise the number of American casualties and possibly put an ending to the long lasting war. This would then represent the orthodox interpretation of this event.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another point that has been made is that there were different alternatives to get the same result. There may have been different ways but those ways may have caused more lives to have been lost and may have made it towards where we would have had to stay in the war longer. And although it may have had helped economically war is not something that anyone wants much less stay in for a long time. Its also been said that the atomic bomb was inhumane. Yes thousands of lives were taken and many suffered from the post affects of it if they didn’t die as soon as it happened but the atomic bomb was just part of the war.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From a military standpoint it was not necessary as the Japanese were ready to collapse; it was only necessary in order to allow the US to get what they want. Document H speaks to this, dismissing the American claim that its use was necessary to end the war and thus causing the Document 's critique of the decision as making America "the arch-enemy of humanity" to be not far off the mark, as the evidence suggests that America cared not for Japan or its people but only for how to advance American interests. From a scientific standpoint, the power of the bomb was already known and needed not to be tested again, let alone on actual people. Finally, any positive diplomatic effects the bomb might have brought about were either nonexistent or overshadowed by the cost of the moral high-ground the US enjoyed before its use: tensions with the Soviets worsened, the Cold War became inevitable, and millions of people were affected. Thus the use of the atomic bomb was a diplomatic blunder to say the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cost and harsh aftermath of bombs are the second reason why the bombs should not have been dropped. Even though the bombs were a great achievement for America, the result of the bombs was seen as a harsh punishment. A quote from the same article says, “but that experience, looking down and finding nothing left of Hiroshima. Hiroshima didn’t exist.” The result of the atomic killed on a massive scale destroyed the city along with its people.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nuclear attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justifiable. Due to the fact that the Japanese government was already in the verge of surrendering to the American government.. Also the nuclear bombing was used for several causes, one of which was to cause fear to both the Japanese and Soviet governments. Finally, the bombing of both major cities in Japan caused many deaths, which were not strategic, nor useful towards the war.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki provided a quick and decisive end to World War II, encouraged an unconditional Japanese surrender, and saved millions…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays