The title is short and descriptive. It indicates the nature of project (high school expansion). It also points out the location of the project, which is Shakopee. However, the location could be expressed with more details such as city or township. A possible alternative could be “Shakopee High School Expansion in City of Shakopee.”
1. The brief project description (with a length of 44 words) complies with 50-word limit. It provides the basic nature of the project, which is an expansion project on the existing Shakopee high school. It also provides the characteristic of the expansion part, which is athletic complex. The location is also provided, which is the area south of County Highway 78. However, it would be better if the brief description could include the city or county name. (City of Shakopee, Scott County).
2. A) The response to question 6b is pretty organized and written in a lot …show more content…
This passage uses a lot of numerical data to clearly point out some possible influences that may be caused by the project. (e.g. “Development of the athletic complex will disturb approximately 68.5 acres and create 8.29 acres of new impervious surface.”). There is a bullet point list in this passage, which makes the modifications of the project on existing structures more straightforward and clear to readers.
3. A) I think section 11.a.ii is a fairly effectively written passage. The passage provides all useful information in very concise expressions, which also includes a lot of numerical data. (e.g. “the depth to groundwater is an average of 139 feet (range 114.7 feet – 170 feet) at the high school project site and 191 feet (range 160 feet – 230 feet) at the athletic complex, p12). This passage also provides readers with a well depth table, which shows the depths of different wells more clearly. This table is also not as complicated as the one in section 10.b, which is too complex for readers to
1. The brief project description (with a length of 44 words) complies with 50-word limit. It provides the basic nature of the project, which is an expansion project on the existing Shakopee high school. It also provides the characteristic of the expansion part, which is athletic complex. The location is also provided, which is the area south of County Highway 78. However, it would be better if the brief description could include the city or county name. (City of Shakopee, Scott County).
2. A) The response to question 6b is pretty organized and written in a lot …show more content…
This passage uses a lot of numerical data to clearly point out some possible influences that may be caused by the project. (e.g. “Development of the athletic complex will disturb approximately 68.5 acres and create 8.29 acres of new impervious surface.”). There is a bullet point list in this passage, which makes the modifications of the project on existing structures more straightforward and clear to readers.
3. A) I think section 11.a.ii is a fairly effectively written passage. The passage provides all useful information in very concise expressions, which also includes a lot of numerical data. (e.g. “the depth to groundwater is an average of 139 feet (range 114.7 feet – 170 feet) at the high school project site and 191 feet (range 160 feet – 230 feet) at the athletic complex, p12). This passage also provides readers with a well depth table, which shows the depths of different wells more clearly. This table is also not as complicated as the one in section 10.b, which is too complex for readers to