The inquiry goes into further depth about how the removal of Aboriginal children was categorised as genocide. “Bringing them home noted that the crime of genocide is not restricted to the immediate physical destruction of a group but includes the forcible transfer of children [article 2(e)] with the intention to destroy, in whole or in part, national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such.”, where law reform would have been necessary at this time to accommodate the safety and human rights of the children who were removed from their homes. This act was defined as unlawful through the inquiry which stated, “The inquiry noted that from 1948 onwards, the date of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, there were clear statements on the content of the crime of genocide and its
The inquiry goes into further depth about how the removal of Aboriginal children was categorised as genocide. “Bringing them home noted that the crime of genocide is not restricted to the immediate physical destruction of a group but includes the forcible transfer of children [article 2(e)] with the intention to destroy, in whole or in part, national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such.”, where law reform would have been necessary at this time to accommodate the safety and human rights of the children who were removed from their homes. This act was defined as unlawful through the inquiry which stated, “The inquiry noted that from 1948 onwards, the date of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, there were clear statements on the content of the crime of genocide and its