Sigmund Feud: A Psychological Analysis

Humanity 's outbursts of emotions are triggered by our inner most thoughts entrenched deep within our minds. How humanity controls or responses to our emotional outburst are solely dependent on how the individual perceives to conduct themselves. A young mother’s short temper towards her three year old son who was repeatedly demanding a pack of gum resulted in the mother’s response to lash at her son by forcefully raising her voice and grabbing her son’s arm intentionally dragging him from the candy shelf. Our society would perceive her actions as normal since we commonly associate mothers to lash out on their children and drag them away from whatever peaked their interests as their way of handling the situation. Unfortunately, we do not question …show more content…
Each of their psychological perspectives are definitely far from having similarities than their differences since human being 's will always perceive differently against one another, never truly, completely agreeing on one ideal. Consequently, each of them provoke a different understanding behind the underlying causes of a short temper represented in a mother 's short temper against her three year old son that resulted in her elevating her voice against him and deliberately grabbing her son, dragging him from the gum that peaked his interest. Sigmund Feud’s psychoanalytic perspective elaborately showcases humanity 's expression of a short temper as their inner most traumatic experiences from their unconscious unraveling into their visible conscious to trigger their short tempers. He concludes our most repressed past experiences in our minds are the underlying causes of our short tempers since we neglect how powerful our unconscious affects our behavioral responses on other human begins. However, Carl Rogers’s humanistic perspective is deliberately displayed in his psychological reasoning behind humanity 's behavioral issue of a short temper to be human beings voluntarily submit to their inner most emotions to comprise for their self concept. He knowingly chooses to believe in human beings allowing themselves to consciously appeasing their self concept that they use their internal emotions to relinquish them within their minds. Regardless, each of them contradict one another with one exhibiting our unconscious with our purposely forgotten experiences to trigger our behavioral issue, while the other defines our behavioral