Theory Of Cohabitation Before Marriage

Improved Essays
It is an interesting topic, a topic that media seems to be so interested in. In 2011, the most controversial topic that year was the 72-day-marriage of Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries. This alarming news made divorce seem like such a common, simple issue to be dealt with in no time. Divorce seems to be increasing each year, especially since this issue has become less taboo in more recent years. With the amount of divorces occurring each year, it is impossible not to wonder what causes them. “One in every two marriages end in divorce.” Does this broad, unclear statistic carry any truth at all? Is there really a universal truth about divorce? Oftentimes, this statistic is seen as a “universal truth” in regards to marriage and divorce. As a …show more content…
The theory behind cohabitation is to essentially practice married life, while giving the relationship the ultimate compatibility test. Though it may seem like a great idea, mainly because cohabiting couples tend to learn more about each other compared to couples that do not opt to cohabit before marriage, many of these cohabiting couples never make it to marriage. The reason that cohabitation does not help decrease the divorce rate is that initially, cohabitation is seen as less of a commitment compared to marriage. In the case of infidelity or falling out of love, it is easy to exit a common-law relationship (Kulu and Boyle 881). Ambert’s summary of Homann-Marriott’s 2006 paper states that “couples who cohabit have somewhat less positive problem solving behaviors and are less supportive of each other on average than those who have not cohabited before marriage” (Ambert 15). Because the difference between a common-law relationship to marriage, in this case, is very minimal, there seems as though there is no further effort made in marriage; duties remain the same as the duties prior to marriage. The responsibilities cohabiting couples have and the experiences they have are usually similar to those that married couples have. For many cohabiting couples, there is no real lifelong commitment made to each other, and thus, sometimes unknowingly, this mentality gets transferred into marriage. In other words, the relationship after marriage is viewed exactly the same way as the relationship before marriage was viewed. The stigma of ending a marriage, of getting a divorce is no longer present (Ambert 13). Consequently, divorce is often the answer to unhappiness in marriage. Ambert believes that “Canadians and most Westerners have developed a lower threshold of tolerance when their marriage does not meet with their expectations for personal fulfillment” (14).

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that in “The Cohabitation Epidemic” Neil Clark Warren does not successfully support his conclusion stating that people should be alarmed by the current situations of cohabitation epidemic between couples (Vaughn 482). The author spent a myriad of time discrediting cohabitation between couples as not the right form of trial marriage, which to me is lost in the mix. The author begins his story by explaining the social changes that have taken place during the previous decades, indicating the adverse rise of “cohabitation partner couples/ households (Vaughn 481).” Therefore, all the psychologists who possess knowledge of working with both the married and single couples must get alarmed when such cohabitation cases are…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meg Jay, a clinical psychologist, argues in her article “The Downside of Living Together” that couples can increase their chances of making mistakes by moving in together. She also mentioned that couples who cohabited have greater possibility of divorcing and creating unhappiness. Although Jay’s paper had a great organization and she strongly argues her points about cohabitated by providing facts and sample which happens to be her client, were unrepresentative, weak and illogical.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are worried those who cohabit will develop certain attitudes and issues which will in turn affect their decision making about marriage, eventually leading to divorce. They are also worried that the experience they get from cohabitation will create problem patterns and behaviors in the relationship. Some examples of behaviors are considering divorce, more chances for abuse, more conflict about money, etc.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ron L. Deal also writes in this book that cohabitation increases the chances of divorce. A study by Brown, Sanchez, Nock and Wright (2006) indicates that it has no effects on marital quality. They stretched out former exploration on the relationship between premarital cohabitation and marital results by researching whether contract marriage, which involves more stringent necessities for separation, minimizes the harmful impacts of cohabitation on consequent marital quality and soundness. Utilizing a one of a kind longitudinal information set of agreement and standard love bird couples in Louisiana, they found that pledge marriage does not change the impacts of premarital cohabitation on marital precariousness, joy, reliance, or separation for…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In today’s society, cohabitation could be approached as a form of pair bonding. In the past, this sate of living between couples was frowned upon. Marriage will not become obsolete per se, but, this type of living arrangement is becoming more of a reality for some couples. Cohabitation can vary amongst male and female. One person within the couple may be dependent while the other is more independent. The dependent is usually desperate enough to not live alone. Thus, dealing with unpleasant behavior directed towards recipient is acceptable. They’re willing to take whatever abuse comes their way in order to have someone around rather than being alone.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Cohabitation Is Wrong

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe cohabitation is wrong and it contributes to tearing down of the institute of marriage. Cohabitation usually brings down the meaning that marriage stands, that is, commitment. Cohabitation is a scary world where individuals no longer have the sense of discipline and courage to commit to one individual, but would rather choose to try their luck while being fully aware that they can avoid responsibility as a result of the lack of a formal binding. People often take advantage of each other through cohabitation, however I believe that individuals should live together prior to marriage. Living together before marriage allows individuals to know each other better and make decisions on whether…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cohabitation Sociology

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A new research by Barna Institute studied Americans' perceptions on cohabitation, and its acceptance within different groups.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Families of the 1950’s were very different from contemporary families today. The families of the WWII era and onwards experienced a paradigm shift in how the roles and gender identities were conducted (Strong & Cohen 2014). Men were no longer the sole providers as women had to step up and fill in the labor gaps because of the nation-wide draft enacted in 1940. Eventually the changing family system evolved into the many varieties of families that exist in America these days. One of which is the family of cohabitation. A family of cohabitation consists of non-married individuals living together and sharing intimate sexual relationships (Strong & Cohen 2014).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People think that living together puts couples at a high risk later on, but turns out that is not the care at all (Taryn Hillin). Kurerberg says marring at a young age increase the likelihood of divorce; once you add age into the picture the correlation between divorce and cohabitation disappears. This is because the younger the couple decides to get married the more unexperienced they are. Getting to know each other longer will help relationships. There are couples today that decide to say ‘I do” when they’ve only known each other for 6 months. Couples who begin living together without being married tend to be younger than those who move in after the wedding, that’s why cohabitation seemed to lead to divorce(Robinson, Akirah.).…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many emerging adults consider cohabitation in order to preventing and reducing the chance of divorce. However, the research shows that living together before marriage might increase divorce rates. And it says “cohabitation is neither the ideal nor the marriage equivalent that many emerging adults believe (BergerKathleen, 2014).” Cohabitation might cause negative effect between couples because they are not as committed to each other as they would be in marriage, it might make unstable relationship. Most couple who are cohabitants tend to consistently broke up and cause fighting both physically and verbally. Most emerging adults choose to cohabitation because they can save money by living together. From other research in 30 nations found that cohabitations were happier than married people depend on national…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    More than 60% of first marriages are now preceded by living together. Cohabitation has become the most common pathway to marriage. Through learning more about cohabitation, I have come to realize how troublesome this issue is in our society today. This trend needs to be brought to our society’s attention, so they can realize the impact it is making in our world. Once the issue is brought to the surface, individuals need to make an effort to change this trend. It has recently been brought to my attention just how much Cohabitation is affecting our culture and individual lives.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The couples who decide to marry are more likely to form more stable families than those who don’t marry, divorce or those cohabiting. In her essay “Why The Ring Matters” W. Bradford Wilcox explains the impact that cohabiting brings to children “But a growing body of social scientific evidence strongly suggests that cohabitation and children don’t mix even though more than 40 percent of American children will spend some time in a cohabiting household” (Wilcox 430). This is a large percentage of our population that is being affected by unhealthy relationships. Worst, it damages children mentally, physically, and socially. This ramifications can lead children to fail in school, be sexually abused, get involved in illegal activities, or suffer from depression. Reading what Wilcox reinstates in “Why The Ring Matters”, my interpretation obtain is that the most favorable solution is marriage when it comes to raising a family. In advantage for ourselves, families and society people who love each other should marry and raise exemplary families and children who will one day might follow your teachings and make of this world a better place to…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some statistics say a couple who does not live together before getting married has a 20 percent chance of being divorced within five years. Couples living together prior to marriage increase to 49 percent. Realistically though, more people practice cohabitation, the percentage may be higher for the people who separate instead of getting a divorce, and may skew the statistics. If the couple chooses to live together as an alternative to being married like the statistics show that the relationship will break up within five years is 49 percent (Redmond, “Divorce Statistics…”). In 1995 premarital cohabitation became the normal thing to do. Fifty-six percent of women who got married in the early 1990’s cohabited before marriage (Waite 3.) So the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The months or years prior to and after the honeymoon period of a relationship could determine how the future of that relationship pans out? The reason is due to this dual factors; ‘Character and Attitude’. Taking these into consideration prior to and during cohabitation should be considered a very important step?…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The divorce rate of marriages is about 40-50% in America, that means half of marriages end in divorce.” So why is a thing that looked down upon them but now is so frequent? Well one huge issue is self- happiness. Both views on divorce will be discussed and hopefully you will understand why divorce is not good. My view on divorce is, even though you come across trials and tribulations that shouldn 't cause you to end a marriage in divorce. I believe that there are three major characteristics of a divorce: views on divorce, results of divorce, and ways to avoid divorce.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays