Hume And Kant's Moral Theory

Both Hume and Kant made an important break from other logicians in putting forward a morality that does not include a higher being or god, for a man to identify his moral duty.
Our fine sense does not tell us what something is morally wrong. According to Hume, the moral theory was based on his belief only reason can never cause action. What is going on well our five-sense convey sensory information to our mind and we get bad feelings, or we may not but in many cases, we will get a bad feeling, so we see something happened . Hume definite virtue is always convoyed by a feeling of desire, and vice by a bad feeling or pain. We are forced to commit a virtuous action because it makes pleasing feelings, and we kind of avoid doing a vicious act because …show more content…
He hated Socrates and wrote about Ancient Greece. In Twilight of the Idols , he uses Socrates’ famed violence as part of an ad hominem attack, a logical fallacy Nietzsche focused in. Nietzsche’s viewing platform, Socrates and Plato were to Greek society symptoms of societal decay. In his attack on Western Philosophy throughout Twilight of the Idols, he talked about the main weakness of Socrates he said Socrates was a poor man and belonged to the lowest of the socioeconomic classes in Athens. Nietzsche claims that, with tensions the raboopble gets on top, the rabble in this case being Socrates. However, his main argument against Socrates is that the Athenian was decadent, both in method and message. Socrates and Plato represent for Nietzsche this tradition in which philosophers try to figure out what abjectly true the try to use reason the look for absolute because reason alone the have considered as being corruptive and Nietzsche is arguing that we cannot use reason to prove or to get something rational universal objectivities that was really happing is your real of power which is the drive or the desire of truth is actually creating this believe that you have universal rational objection truth in so Nietzsche in sense set Plato over if Plato for example the three parts of the soul Plato wants something that you can grab the intellect and Plato wants to keep the desire of the body out of it because our progresses feeling can cloud our judgment and because our prejudges we end up by thinking something true something good for our favors of relative or Stenger is Plato thinks we need to graph what is morally right or true of just using out intellect not using our senses so Nietzsche is kind of take other side saying “ you are an animal you are throwing in the world out of time you have the powerful feelings and existing you throwing in the world first you start care about things in then you start to develop conscious