Ethics Case Study: The Death Of Debbie

Superior Essays
3. Teleologically, the moral end is what is most important to determine. In this specific case, the moral end was ultimately the death of Debbie, to grant her the peace and rest from the illness. In this specific case, I would say that the moral end was ethical and that by granting Debbie the respectable death and the end of suffering. Ultimately the moral end was to do good over evil, similar to utilitarianism. The doctor had to decide whether death was evil or good. In this specific moral case, I would infer that ultimately to leave Debbie alive and leave her suffering and miserable, as she most likely would starve to death, would be truly evil and cruel. Whereas, granting Debbie the right to end her own life allowed her a freedom and …show more content…
Therefore, in my overall opinion, the doctor, in this specific case, had the moral and ethical responsibility to put Debbie out of her misery and therefore, no legal actions should be taken against the hospital or against the doctor. This end can be reached clearly from all of the evidence that has been previously given, without looking into any biblical texts. According to the Bible, murder is a sin and it is one of the Ten Commandments. However, in this specific case, I would not classify the doctor’s actions as murder. Murder is committed with harbored thoughts of hate and ill-intentions, in this specific case, the intentions are all good and for the better of Debbie, therefore, the murder is justifiable and should not be considered murder at all. The bible commands us to love our neighbors as we love ourselves (Matthew 22:39). In my own opinion, the doctor preformed the biggest act of love that they could have, the doctor ended the suffering of their patient, Debbie. I feel that in different scenarios this might be different and I do not think Euthanasia is ever okay in the context of doing it too simply clear space in a hospital. Euthanasia is okay in the context that it is ending the suffering of an adult and that it is allowing someone to have control over their death rather than a miserable unknown agonizing pain. Euthanasia is also only okay if the family agrees upon it and the person that is being euthanized is consciously aware and able to make the decision that they want to be euthanized. The bible also discusses suffering and hardships frequently throughout the New Testament. In 1 Peter 5:10 it says, “and after you have suffered a little while, the God of all grace, who has called you to his eternal glory in Christ, will himself, restore, confirm, strengthen, and establish you” (ESV). Now this does not necessarily mean that God was saving Debbie by allowing her to commit suicide. However, I feel that in Debbie’s case, Christian or not, God

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The policy prohibits active euthanasia, but the statement begins to deny that no further treatment is related to the intentional termination of life. Rachels points out the mistake in the statement. He thinks that doctors are only worried about the patient will die soon, or the patient’s life will become a huge burden. Nonetheless, he shows the same viewpoint in these cases that significant difference between killing and letting die hardly exist in the case of euthanasia. No matter what humane reasons that a doctor decides to let a patient die, his decision would be morally reprehensible.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering. There are many different types of euthanasia: voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary; euthanasia by action or by omission; and assisted suicide. This essay will focus solely on physician assisted suicide. Medicinenet.com defines assisted suicide as the voluntary termination of one's life by administration of lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance. Dr. Brian Pollard discusses in the article, “Human Rights and Euthanasia” the case of physician assisted suicide and the autonomy of both the patient and the physician.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in the case of physician-assisted suicide, there are no apparent social consequences for the actions of the patient. In Dr. Quill’s account, Diane’s decision to end her suffering did not contribute to any negative social consequences. As Arras demonstrates in the case above, there are crucial flaws with adopting an entirely rights-based society. Nevertheless, a rights-based approach provides a unique perspective in favor of physician-assisted death. The Utilitarian…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Terri Schiavo was a right-to-die case involving a woman who was in an irreversible persistent vegetative state in the United States from 1990 to 2005. Schiavo family debated on her behalf to be remove from the feeding tube if it was not going to help her recover and finally it took President George W. Bush seven years before ultimately removing Terri feeding tube. Euthanasia or better known as assisted suicide is “the act or practice of causing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (such as persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy” and can be categories as non-voluntary, involuntary, and voluntary or passive, and active. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted without consent; voluntary…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of killing someone painlessly, usually by giving them a lethal dose of medication. This practice is banned in almost all of the states since it is seen as morally wrong. In addition, physicians have lived by the Hippocratic Oath for more than two-thousand years. The code clearly states a physician’s role as a healer and that under no circumstances should they administer deadly medicine; euthanasia goes directly against the Hippocratic Oath…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachel’s argues against The Difference Thesis he says that the issue of active and passive euthanasia is not a morally relevant problem: there is no moral difference between killing and letting die (863-864). He believes that killing is not always worse than letting die. Rachel’s argument has exceptional impact on one’s ideas. He uses an example of two men Smith and Jones. Smith will inherit a large sum of money if something fatal were to happen to his 6 year .old…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to come up with an opinion over the idea of physician-assisted suicide, one must take into consideration many viewpoints and try to analyze such an act through the four basic principles of medical ethics. In regards to autonomy, the practice seems justified. If a patient wants to depart this world with dignity or relieve him or herself from future pain, then they have the right to do so. As a physician, I would have to respect a patient’s right to choose what happens to his or her body. The other principles can contradict the idea of autonomy.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are times, however, that decisions become more difficult. One situation is during end of life care. The line between what is ethical and what provides the quickest relief from symptoms can cause the health care provider to rightfully question their practices. Although providing lethal doses of medication to cause death is a quick way to relieve terminal symptoms, it is unethical for the health care practitioner to participate in such practices because the practitioner is causing harm to the patient. Further, assisting a patient with dying is illegal in all but three states in the United States, and is in direct contrast to a biblical worldview which teaches that we are not to murder.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia have been a huge ethical conflict throughout time. PAS and Euthanasia has been one of the most controversial topic in the health care industry. As future Health Care Administrators and patients, we need to be aware of the state laws, moral and ethical issues that arise with administering PAS to occur in our hospitals. We need to analyze each case carefully and look into the specifics without rushing to a decision. PAS is often confused with Euthanasia however the two terminologies are quite different.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Seeing a loved one enduring excruciating agony due to an illness or medical condition can be unquestionably painful, especially terminal illnesses. By legalizing the physician-assisted suicide it gives the person enduring pain, as well as the family, another choice to help their loved one not suffer. However, only five states in the U.S. passed legislation for legalized physician-assisted suicide. This particular procedure differs in each state; however, it mainly involves a prescription from a licensed doctor approved by the state in which the patient legally resides. In the states that passed the “Death with Dignity Act”, such as Oregon, “The law requires the patient to be: 1) 18 years of age or older, 2) a resident of Oregon, 3) capable…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract Law is formed for a motive and it regulates in many areas like medicine, before practicing any medical procedure or conducting a form of administrative position each medical specialist or non-medical specialist operative must comprehend a difference between ethical or unethical. Ethical and Unethical plays a significant role in our humanity every way it is whether up to how you want to approach it. According to “The case of Jeanette M. And the phone call” altered from the beginning of chapter 1 of “Medical Law and Ethics” inscribed by Bonnie Fremgen, it exemplifies how a medical receptionist and the doctor action resulted in death of Jeanette M. This case falls into so many categories of violations and code of ethics such as being…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal in Every State When it comes to the topic of physician-assisted suicide, most of will readily agree that the patient has their right to choose their form of treatment; if they chose death, then the reasoning is that they chose to die with dignity. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of, does allowing patients to die under a doctor’s care deem the death as murder. Some are convinced that it does, other maintain that allowing patients to do so in tern, breaks the Hippocratic Oath. Here in the states, we are very fortunate with every law and amendment that gives us the right to do with what we want with limits.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prompt that I chose was “The Timothy Quill Case.” Dr. Timothy Quill starts off the case by describing to his readers about the events that happened. He published the case as an article in New England Journal of Medicine in March 1991. Dr. Quill prescribed barbiturates for his 45 year old patient who was suffering from leukemia, Patricia Diane Trumbull. He also told his patient the amount of drug taken that would be considered lethal.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays