The Mongols Ibn Al-Athir Summary

Improved Essays
While reading chapter eleven I decided to write my interrogation on section seven, The Mongols. I really enjoyed this section and found that Ibn Al-Athir, the author, had many assumptions, interests, and ideals. He wasn’t afraid to state his opinion and had strong feelings on the Mongols. I found it very interesting to read his first-hand account and see how people of that day viewed the Mongols. As I was reading I came across many of Al-Athir’s assumptions. His biggest assumption, in my opinion, was his assumption that the Mongols were the worst people in history. He stated many times how such a catastrophe would never be seen in the world again. Based on his description on the slaughter of the Israelites it did seem very gruesome, but

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The attitude of people toward the Mongol are varied, depend on perspective of people. Document 1 and 6 show people’s opinion to Genghis Khan and his change to the Mongol society. Document 3, 4 and 5 shown people’s attitude to the Mongol society at the time of Genghis Khan. Also, Document 2, 7 and 8 discuss about the attitude to Mongol conquest that that time. The attitude toward Mongol are varied in these 8 documents.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Genghis Khan and the Mongols were willing to go to great lengths to succeed in conquering Asia. In fact, they went much too far. Although they did do many great things for the economy of the towns they conquered, and they held many admirable beliefs, that does not excuse the fact that they killed a very large amount of people and they did so in terrible ways. Genghis Khan had incredibly strict rules for his men. Document 2 states that if a group of 10 people flee from battle, then the other 90 people that were part of that group all get put to death.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    DBQ On Modern Day Mongols

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Coupled with the fact that they didn’t spare children or animals this is one of the main things that made The Mongols truly barbaric. Another way the Mongols show they were barbaric in the past is by burying their prisoners alive upside down{Document 5}. Not only did The Mongols bury their prisoners alive but they also tortured them before they died which proves how much much hatred and disrespect they had for their enemies Altogether The Mongols were ruthless killers and that made them barbaric.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mongols have taken over city after city and killed so many innocent people, yet can they be barbaric for killing people. A reasonable answer would be,”Yes” as killing someone isn’t right. The mongols go overboard, to execute their rivals and dig them upside down.(Document 5) This doesn’t compare to what the us has done. The U.s Launched the “Little Boy” in 1945 killing 80,000 humans and later with radiation killed more.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were a nomadic civilization that never settled in one place. They lived in yurts or tents that could be easily packed up and moved. In the early 12th century, the Mongols were made up of many tribes who often fought and competed for land and livestock. In 1206, Genghis Khan united these tribes and the Mongols went on to become the most successful warriors in history. Although the Mongols brutally killed and murdered many people, they developed battle tactics, laws, and an acceptance of religion that demonstrated that was an advanced society.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nichiren’s religious vision is competitive, harsh, critical and aggressive. In his letter to Nishiyama Nyudo in 1275, Nichiren discusses the execution of Mongol envoys, and the possible Mongol invasion to come. Nichiren writes, “I have also received your news about the beheading of the Mongol envoys. How pitiful that they have beheaded the innocent Mongol envoys and yet failed to cut off the heads of the priests of the Nembutsu, Shingon, Zen, and Ritsu sects, who are the real enemies of the country… Among all grave matters, the ruin of the nation is the most serious.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World is a narrative that presents a look into the life, and accomplishments of Genghis Khan, and the legacy he and his successors had on European civilization. The book depicts a more sympathetic view on the Mongols, that is contrary to the popular belief that they were a tyrannical group with a dark nature. The author, Jack Weatherford, a professor of Anthropology at Macalester College, delves into the life of Genghis Khan and the many victories he and his military claimed throughout his lifetime. Weatherford resurrects the true nature and history of Genghis Khan, from his relentless and powerful rise through Mongol tribal culture, to the waging of his countless successful wars and the expansion of civilization that the Mongol Empire created.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Mongols created the largest empire in all of history. The land they had conquered is more than two times that of the next greatest conqueror, Alexander the Great. But unlike Alexander, who is often remembered as a hero, the legacy of the Mongols is one of brutality and barbarism. But in truth, these so-called “barbarians” were, in fact, not very barbaric at all. Recent discoveries challenged the long-accepted statement of Mongols being savage brutes, suggesting that they were perhaps wrongly labelled; the facts about them were twisted and lost to history.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This document may have some exaggerations because it was written from the point of view of an outsider who could’ve been surprised because he was the first European to visit the Mongol homeland. The Mongols also took the fact of the people they killed, melted it and catapulted it on their houses, which shows barbarism because those acts are cruel and inhuman. (Doc 3) Documents 4 and 5 show evidence of barbarism because they talk about how the Mongols killed entire cities, even cats and dogs, and how they also buried people alive upside and down. The Mongols showed their savage-like ways in document 10 because it said drunkenness was considered an honorable act. The Mongols lived quite a barbaric life style.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (Written by: Richard Hellie) Here are some fact about alexander and his relationship with the Mongols. Alexander Neviskii was the prince of Novgorod. Alexander was the second son of Prince Yaroslav Vsevolodivch. Alexander and his father gave time to Batu Khan and the land became part of the Genghisid golden horde empire and its military force combined with the Mongols military.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols and the Europeans had many characteristics that were similar and characteristics that set them apart. They both had strong attributes that set them apart from any other group of people; they were powerful in their own way. It was the Mongols during the third wave civilizations era that created the largest and influential empire of that millennium. Their empire reached all the way to Eastern Europe and it was the Mongols that brought regions together into a single interacting network. The Comparing and contrasting of two expansive cultures will provide us with a better understand of how their connection pushed us into the global integration of the modern era.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were horse riding people that began gaining power in 1130 A.D and their empire collapsed in late 1368 A.D. They were known for their warfare methods, which were extremely unique at the time because they rode on horseback and completely destroyed every surrounding civilization they went into war with. The Mongols were also known for having one of the most iniquitous rulers of all time, Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan then passed the empire on to his grandson, Kublai Khan. Throughout this paper I will be discussing how the Mongol Empire was founded, how their education system worked, daily life, housing, how horses became such a big part of the Mongol Empire, Genghis Khan being in power, warfare for the Mongols, passing the empire on to Kublai Khan, and contributing factors of the empire ending in 1368.…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire (1200 – 1400 CE) was arguably the largest land empire of the time. To date, it is the second largest empire in landmass ever, second only to the British Empire. At its height, it had covered an area of over 33 million km3; it is estimated to have had a population of over 100 million people. The expansive empire was birthed through the leadership of Genghis Khan in 1206 [also referred to as Chinggis Khan]. It stretched from China to the east to as far as current day Iraq to the west (Brent, 1976).…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol History: Ariq Boke

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ariq Boke normally can be viewed as a questionable figure in Mongol history. Often times he is portrayed negatively through the primary sources of his era, especially those of Rashid Al-Din. However, despite his controversial background, Ariq Boke was an important figure in the Mongol empire because he represented the opposing internal conflicts of the Mongol imperium, as well as demonstrated the turbulence of the time. Generally, the inevitable war between Ariq Boke and his older brother Khubulai, is normally viewed as a struggle for succession, and additionally exemplifies physical confrontation between nomadic and settled life. And although Khubulai managed to defeat Ariq Boke, it is evident that Ariq Boke was the better of the two successors.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays