The Mongols: How Barbaric Were The Barbarians

Improved Essays
The Mongols: How Barbaric Were the “ Barbarians”?

Genghis Khan and the Mongols gave birth to an empire that would spread death and destruction everywhere they stepped, by means of conquest, the way they employed battle tactics and, their way of culture inside their empire.

The Mongol empire ,brutally and mercilessly, conquered anyone who surrounded them as they pleased. In the chart titled Size of World Conquests we can see how much the Mongols expanded their empire. Genghis Khan and his armies covered more than 4,800,000 square miles. Robert Marshall, in Storm from the East, From Genghis Khan to Kubilai Khan, gives two statistics comparing China before Mongol conquest, and after Mongol conquest. The first shows a census taken ,by the Chin
…show more content…
The Franciscan emissary named John of Plano Carpini had multiple accounts of these tactics. He describes them in a compendium of letters and narratives titled The Mongol Mission as follows, “ If the position of the fortress allows it, they surround it, sometimes even fencing it round so no one can enter or leave. They make a strong attack with engines ( catapults fro slinging large stones ) and arrows and they do not leave off fighting by day or by night, so that those in the fortress get no sleep; If they cannot capture it in this way they throw Greek fire (napalm); sometimes they even take the fat of people they kill and, melting it, throw it ( catapult ) it on to the houses,”. In another account he mentions that “ When they are in battle, if one or two or three or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; … In a word, unless they retreat in a body, all who take flight are put to death.”. Robert Marshall Further explains their military duties in Storm from the East, From Genghis Khan to Kubilai Khan as follows, “ All men over the age of fourteen were expected to undertake military duty.”. He also clarifies how soldiers wore silk under their armor to prevent arrows or other projectiles from piercing them. Finally, a Persian manuscript titled The Shah Namah, or The Book of Kings, portrays the execution of a prisoner by a Mongol soldier, while other prisoners get buried alive upside

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Document 2, 7 and 8 illustrate this aspect. Document 2 is about a gift from French, that is very fancy. Document 7 discuss about Mongol assignation during the conquest. Document 7’s author is from Persia, which was conquered by Mongol. This makes him likely to exaggerate the brutal of Mongols.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols are barbaric because they are strategic, brutal, and they are conquers. The Mongols are barbaric because they are strategic with their plan of attack. In document 3 it states that “When they are to join battle, they draw all the battles lives just as they are (about) to fight.” They send people a group of people of other nationalities to meet with the enemy head-on and these people…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols were people from Central Asia who came together to establish an empire which lasted from 1206 CE to 1368 CE. They were herdsmen and tradesmen who herded sheep and goats, and were nomadic people. Even though at first the Mongol community was small, they were able to expand by conquering China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols were culturally destructive and constructive to a moderate extent in Persia during the 13th century because they positively influenced academics while they subjugated agriculture.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The benefits of the Mongol rule influenced more than just Asia, but the entire world. China had not been unified for over 300 years (section 12.3 in the textbook) until the Mongols founded…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although the ways the Mongols dealt with war and prisoners were barbaric, their society and way of life was extremely civilized. For example, the Mongols buried prisoners alive, which was extremely barbaric. Document four states “They severed the heads of the slain from their bodies and heaped them up in piles, keeping those of the men separate from those of the women and children.” This act was also extremely barbaric.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 13th century, a small tribe from the steppes of Central Asia had conquered most of the known world at the time. Mongols rode on the back of horses, as they swept most of Asia, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. It has never been seen before at the time, they had even taken over more land than Alexander the Great, the mongols taking 4,860,000 square miles of land. (Document 1). The mongols were fearless warriors who took over people's land yet they weren't as barbaric as they seem.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Mongols Essay

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In many reported deaths, caused by mongols, the statistics have arrived at the 2,000,000 mark. On the Carpini on Battle Tactics, it shows the way the mongols organized their fighting. The barbaric mongols would put false men on horses to make the enemy feel threatened due to the grand amount of the figures they saw, distinguished to be seen as real men. The soldiers who were from other nationalities were placed in front to meet the enemy first. Stronger men were dispatch at the right and left sides to surround the enemy and weaken the fortress.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Given its military prowess, the Mongol Empire was able to stretch its territory to an extraordinary level--the four corners of the border were marked by Poland, Egypt, Java, and Japan. (Weatherford 214) The empire covered most of Asia and tiny parts of Europe and Africa. Despite the suffering from the warfare, the areas under the Mongol rule “were able to enjoy a unprecedented century of political peace with a commercial, technological, and intellectual explosion unlike any in prior history.” (Weatherford 214)…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mongol Empire Dbq Essay

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Their laws, military strategies are those of an ideal nation, and they brought prosperity to all their conquered lands. The Mongols were a civilized nation, with a brilliant society that…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire is known for their barbaric ways like warfare and torture, which scared many people, they also made significant contributions to politics, economic development, and cultural diversity to many lands. Although the Mongols slaughtered entire cities and had rules that were barbaric, they were also in charge of trade routes, enforced important rules, had communication systems, and were religiously tolerant. The Mongols were somewhat barbaric because there were many parts of their civilization that were advanced. Documents 2,3,4,5 and 10 show how the Mongols were barbaric. In document two, it says that in battles, if one man ran away the whole group of men would be put to death.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: How Barbaric were the "Barbarians"? Although Mongols were strikingly ruthless through their military tactics (Doc. 2, 3,4,5), they were able to develop a rather sophisticated society (Doc. 7, 9, 10) and executed noteworthy and structured accomplishments (Doc. 1, 6, 8). As shown in documents 2, 3, 4, and 5, the Mongolians are quite infamous for their questionable harshness considering their military techniques.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongols had a very different approach to controlling their empire…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongolian and Roman Empires were both vast and expansive empires. Both societies were able to accomplish tasks that no other empire had previously achieved. Although both empires were extremely successful in very similar ways, there were many differences between the two vast empires. This paper will explore both the similarities and differences between the two sprawling empires. Similarities…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With his extraordinary military accomplishments and leadership skills, Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler who united all the nomadic tribes in the steppe of Mongolia and built the largest land empire in the world in the thirteenth century. He left a great legacy through his innovative ideas and laws whilst also promoting religious freedom, allowing an exchange of the global economy between Asia and Europe (Weatherford). However, with a belief that there should be only one ruler under the sky, Genghis Khan was unlikely to forgive those who refused to join forces with him and vanquished millions who wanted to create empires of their own. This presented an image of him and the Mongols as brutal savages who eliminated entire cultures, devastated…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Mongol Empire (1200 – 1400 CE) was arguably the largest land empire of the time. To date, it is the second largest empire in landmass ever, second only to the British Empire. At its height, it had covered an area of over 33 million km3; it is estimated to have had a population of over 100 million people. The expansive empire was birthed through the leadership of Genghis Khan in 1206 [also referred to as Chinggis Khan]. It stretched from China to the east to as far as current day Iraq to the west (Brent, 1976).…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays