Today's Nuclear Crisis Analysis

Improved Essays
The Dangers of Nuclear Modernization
Many people know how dangerous nuclear weapons are; Bombs that are capable of destroying an entire country that are being developed and modernized for destruction. In Eric Schlosser’s article, Today’s Nuclear Crisis, gives an overview about the world’s nuclear crisis. Unknown to the public, the development of the modernization of nuclear weapons is in full effect. Schlosser argues that nuclear landscaping is a worldwide issue, and it is very dangerous that it is being kept from the eye of the public. The article shows how dangerous the issue of nuclear landscaping is. Based on Schlosser’s article, nuclear weapons are dangerous machinery that should not be kept from public consciousness. The public should
…show more content…
He begins to prove this point by giving example of the various countries that possess nuclear weapons and are continuing modernize them. The US, being the endorser for the abolishment, has a modernization program that will develop to cost one trillion dollars for the next 30 years. Moreover, Russia, China, North Korea and many more countries are also continuing to develop their machinery. Russia and North Korea boosted the size of their nuclear arsenal by stating how they can turn the USA into “radioactive dust”. Therefore, nuclear weapons are also seen as a symbol of national …show more content…
Although the article was seven pages, it was easy to get through. While reading, the amount of information provided proved how dangerous the weapons are, and further convinced me that nuclear weapons should be illegal. Emphasized throughout the paper, the public has forgotten how dangerous these weapons are since the Atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Therefore, keeping these weapons hidden from the public is not a good idea. Having these weapons of mass destruction hiding in plain site allows society to become comfortable with the idea that there is nothing to worry about. Continuing, Schlosser provides wide range of evidence to portray the dangerousness of the weapons. The amount of countries that possess nuclear weapons is a scary. From Pakistan to France, to Israel, the amount of countries that develop these weapons shows just how dangerous these weapons are. Moreover, Schlosser made a good point about how nuclear weapons are made by humans, therefore, they are imperfect. This was a good point because since we are human beings, we are not perfect. Therefore, there are bound to be glitches and at one point it might seem perfect, but, there’s always a 1% chance that something could go wrong. The amount of close calls that Schlosser provided as a evidence showed how lucky we are that nothing live changing has happened over any accidents that have occurred over negligence. Furthermore, the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Some authors support the decision of nuclear weapon while others claim that it is detrimental to human life. The dilemma attracted committee and experts in nuclear weapons to help in making an approximate decision. The president intention was to instill “fear” to the Japanese leaders in both political and military array. Roosevelt was the founder of the project, which was connected to the ability of the nation to use the technology. Roosevelt understood the danger exposed to the nation, therefore, security was one the factors that affect the development of a country.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    3- According to this article, there is a nuclear war predicted to happen in the near future between the U.S. and Russia. Each one of them has nuclear weapons and tries to build bigger bombs and more accurate missiles to ensure its security. In this article, Donella Meadows illustrates that there is another solution to ensure each country’s security; it is so simple that children can come up with. The solution is that both countries have to get rid of their nuclear weapons. In order to prove that, Meadows quoted two conversations from a journal called “Nuclear Concerns and Humankind”.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also nuclear weapons cannot differentiate between military targets and civilians it violates the Geneva Conventions, which protect civilians. The author than talks about how the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons has convinced many countries to seek abolition of nuclear weapons and how the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons have been steps in the right direction. The last point of the article is about how to undo the knowledge to create nuclear bombs. Schlosser believes that the knowledge to create these weapons can be forgotten because as time passes and when there is no nuclear testing, people will forget as they become less…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J. Robert Oppenheimer, the scientific leader of the Manhattan Project, has been famously quoted upon witnessing the first test of an atomic bomb, "I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds. " The world may never face another scientific and ethical dilemma like nuclear weapons. Technology is constantly changing and there are a number of developments that will cause moral debate. Most scientific discoveries can be utilized for multiple purposes. Just because there is a potentially harmful application does not mean the concepts, techniques or even technologies should not be pursued…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With numerous amounts of detail and foreign affairs in the article, Coll uses this as a means to show his knowledge on the topic while still persuading the modest tone. Coll’s details on Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and other countries about nuclear affairs is meant to educate the reader by giving him the knowledgeable insight on the topic being discussed in places other than the United States. Coll says things like, “more dangerous competition is gaining momentum in the Middle East,” and “ it may be impossible to prevent nuclear gridlock in the Middle East.” These statements show the scale of nuclear affairs and maximizes the importance of the matter. By using international affairs and showing the danger and problems in other places of the across the world, Coll hopes to show that the danger occurring in other places could eventually be occurring here if nothing is done to solve it.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On October 1st, 2001, Johnathan Schell uses the past month’s event of 9/11 to heighten his talk about nuclear warfare. This article, “A Hole in the World”, was published in The Nation shortly after, so he uses that emotion and logic to persuade Americans to change their fear into action and to…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “The Development of atomic power will provide the nations with new means of destruction. The atomic bombs…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Perry

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it stated in the article, “unlike the original Cold War, this time there is a world of busy fanatics excited by the prospect of a planet with more bombs—people who have already demonstrated the desire to slaughter many thousands of people in an instant, and are zealously pursuing ever more deadly means to do so.” Along with that, people are not as prepared for a nuclear war to happen. I do realize that there is not much you can do if a bomb is dropped in the area you live in, but if everyone was given knowledge about them, it may be able to save some people in the surrounding areas. Many years ago, nuclear wars were a common topic of movies and people thought about the threat of them everyday, but that is the other difference from the times of the Cold War, “Americans no longer think about the threat everyday.” I thought this article was very interesting because I had never thought about how others may look at nuclear weapons, especially those that had experienced wars where these types of weapons were used in the past, like Bill…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, an argument against the view that the proliferation of nuclear weapons it’s inevitable and will eventually escalate to nuclear war, is that since 1945 there is not a single case recorded with the use of nuclear weapons. Second, by taking this pacifist’s position…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was July sixteenth, at 5:29 a.m. A luminous explosion was resounding over the black scorched sand in Los Alamos, Mexico. The dirt screamed death and destruction, warning the world never to take the path of nuclear weapons. This was the testing of an atomic bomb, a model for a bomb that may demolish the innocent souls of those living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The building of the bomb to detonate on Japan is a point of much controversy.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    During the Cold War, the Marshall Islands served as a nuclear testing ground; sixty seven nuclear bombs were detonated by the United States government (17). On the 1st of March 1954 a hydrogen bomb, called Bravo was dropped on the Bikini Atoll (11). The bomb was dropped regardless of weather forecasts that predicted winds which would blow the radioactive fallout over much of the surrounding islands and the island’s inhabitants. The consequences that followed the explosion left the indigenous population of the Marshall Islands with a permanently uninhabitable homeland and people who were infected in perpetuity.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How often do you consider the ubiquity of weapons of mass murder, patiently aimed at our suburbia? Every single day your life is chanced upon the 16,300 nuclear weapons, waiting to be activated at the whim of that government. Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Beatrice Fihn, outlines the necessity of banning these weapons and the imminent danger of nuclear technology with her 2017 speech. Fihn utilizes numerous literary devices—such as diction, metaphors and scare tactic—to deliver a cohesive and persuasive argument against the use and development of nuclear weaponry, whilst maintaining a connection with her audience.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many nuclear scholars and political scientists contend that states would rarely if ever give up or sell their nuclear materials, but this argument only operates on the national level. Using the example of A.Q. Khan, Levi argues that subnational actors do not always have the same limitations and interests as national actors. Regardless of how robust the worlds nuclear control systems might be, the risk that nuclear materials will get into the hands of terrorist groups will always exist, which is is why the US’ best chance of countering nuclear terrorism is to ensure that government entities are sharing information and working together in a multifaceted fashion to disrupt terrorist…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Understanding history is crucial to the way our modern society operates on an economic and political level. One of the greatest controversies of recent history displayed itself in the form of World War Two, in which hundreds of thousands of men and women around the globe were killed in unimaginably horrible ways. The political issues behind this major war are widespread. However, one particular aspect of the war, which has become especially popular today, is the nuclear development of the time. One of the United States’ many enemies was the Empire of Japan.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear weapons were introduced into the world in 1945 ending the WW2. They were made to “protect” innocent people of the world, however, it ended up hurting and threatening them. We know what nuclear weapons can do, it has both short term effects and long term effects, but yet we still construct more and more of them. In total, there are about 23 000 nuclear weapons in the world with Russia and the United States owning most of them (Walker, Countdown to Zero). Clearly, that is way too much weapons that cause mass destructions.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays