The Argument About The Brain Machine And The Programed Machine By Roger Shank

The Mind, brain, and programs critics’ article show an argument about the brain machine and the programed machine that they think similarly and have similar understanding of different stories with different level of complexity. The Author consider Roger Shank’s program because is related to the sort of work the author want to examine in this paper. Shanks’s work aim that computer has the capacity to understand stories and answer question about them as the human being does. His hypothesis that the machine can understand the story and provide the answers to questions, and also that the machine and its program do explains the human ability to understand the story and answer questions about it. The authors question both hypothesis and said that they are unsupported by the explanation Shank. To Show that Shanks work was not support he provided different stories about how human can provide answer to complicated stories about …show more content…
The Author said that the response of the answer will be similar for simple story by the arguing that if we complicated the story and make difficult so the response if going to be similar. And he based his discuss about this concept. This paper tried to show that the claim of Schank and his colleague was not supported. Their claim was “that the machine can literally be said to understand the story and provide the answers to questions, and that what the machine and its program do explains the human ability to understand the story and answer question about it.” (Searle, 1980) He did not clearly stated his hypothesis but his claim was to show that the two statement above were not supported. The objective of this paper was stated and it was clear that the paper will be testing the similarity and the differences between the ability to understand and imply the information