Descartes even states it, “I am conscious that I exist …. Is not dependent on things, the existence of which is as yet unknown to me” (Descartes 106). This false cause is mentioned by the secondary author, “Even Descartes recognized the need to acknowledge the close, intimate relationship between mind and body” (Chaffee 108). This consciousness is dependent on the natural causes of development in the world of physical and natural laws not some supernatural force that substances its essence that is isolated and alone. Second is that the consciousness is also affected by internal things of desire and despair. This concludes that the mind can adapt or evolve that through the current present this change can occur with different stimuli. Although the argument for exists is still questionable there is a lot more direct evidence to prove through naturalism that the existence of the self has a reasoning thinking thing that is conditional to the universe and its laws. Now also mentioning the fact that there can be internal constraints, as well that effect and can cause continual effects, which directly affects the self. This point was first documented by, Mortiz Schlick a Philosopher who wrote “When Is a Man Responsible” according the secondary author Schlick mentions the constraints of “mental illness and neuroses” are causes that effect or constraint the minds “functions and natural tendencies” (Chaffee 180). This of course could not be assumed at the time yet Descartes still believed that the mind receded in the brain. So it concludes that even though the self does exist, as an apparent abstract idea of the mind through rational facilities, the certainty of the self depends on influences of outside experience and limitations and how the
Descartes even states it, “I am conscious that I exist …. Is not dependent on things, the existence of which is as yet unknown to me” (Descartes 106). This false cause is mentioned by the secondary author, “Even Descartes recognized the need to acknowledge the close, intimate relationship between mind and body” (Chaffee 108). This consciousness is dependent on the natural causes of development in the world of physical and natural laws not some supernatural force that substances its essence that is isolated and alone. Second is that the consciousness is also affected by internal things of desire and despair. This concludes that the mind can adapt or evolve that through the current present this change can occur with different stimuli. Although the argument for exists is still questionable there is a lot more direct evidence to prove through naturalism that the existence of the self has a reasoning thinking thing that is conditional to the universe and its laws. Now also mentioning the fact that there can be internal constraints, as well that effect and can cause continual effects, which directly affects the self. This point was first documented by, Mortiz Schlick a Philosopher who wrote “When Is a Man Responsible” according the secondary author Schlick mentions the constraints of “mental illness and neuroses” are causes that effect or constraint the minds “functions and natural tendencies” (Chaffee 180). This of course could not be assumed at the time yet Descartes still believed that the mind receded in the brain. So it concludes that even though the self does exist, as an apparent abstract idea of the mind through rational facilities, the certainty of the self depends on influences of outside experience and limitations and how the