As a person’s life is approaching its end under a hospital 's care they have the choice to control their pain and other symptoms. They also can receive religious, psychological, and social support. Because a person has the control over their pain, they have control over whether or not to take their medicine. The medicine they can choose whether or not to take can be sustaining their life so they essential are choosing life or death. If they chose not to take the medicine they would go through intense amounts of pain before they died. If assisted suicide was legalized they could pass away without pain and without suffering.
It is said that the medicine one is to take when facing a terminal illness gets rid of all pain. This is an oversimplification. …show more content…
This is why she is one the advocate for death with dignity program. They want to make sure that if anyone ends up in her shoes that they will have the same choice and opportunities that she did. She says that nobody has the right to deny one their right to die. The right to die should be expressed just like any other right in the Constitution. The First Amendment allows the freedom of speech, press, and religion. With freedom of speech one does not have to speak out but if they have something they want to say, they can express it. Under freedom of speech and press one’s values can be disrespected, but also can be uplifted. The same goes for freedom of religion, some religions have similar beliefs while others completely go against each other. The right to die is the same way. Physician assisted suicide goes against many people’s religions and beliefs, but it also follows many others values. In today’s society every opposition is argued upon because it goes against someone’s thoughts. Society is not perfect but can be perfected. If physician assisted suicide was legalized it would be argued about constantly and be uplifted constantly at the same time. The United States is about freedom, and legalized physician assisted suicide would only further express that
It is said that the medicine one is to take when facing a terminal illness gets rid of all pain. This is an oversimplification. …show more content…
This is why she is one the advocate for death with dignity program. They want to make sure that if anyone ends up in her shoes that they will have the same choice and opportunities that she did. She says that nobody has the right to deny one their right to die. The right to die should be expressed just like any other right in the Constitution. The First Amendment allows the freedom of speech, press, and religion. With freedom of speech one does not have to speak out but if they have something they want to say, they can express it. Under freedom of speech and press one’s values can be disrespected, but also can be uplifted. The same goes for freedom of religion, some religions have similar beliefs while others completely go against each other. The right to die is the same way. Physician assisted suicide goes against many people’s religions and beliefs, but it also follows many others values. In today’s society every opposition is argued upon because it goes against someone’s thoughts. Society is not perfect but can be perfected. If physician assisted suicide was legalized it would be argued about constantly and be uplifted constantly at the same time. The United States is about freedom, and legalized physician assisted suicide would only further express that