Should Torture Be Allowed

Improved Essays
Torture, for most people using this word usually brings up bad meanings or memories. I think sometimes people will avoid this word or using this word because it makes them uncomfortable. One definition is “intense physical or mental suffering, something that causes pain or to inflict pain upon; to cause to suffer” (Webster’s Standard Dictionary). That does not sound pleasant, other definitions aren’t any better. Another dictionary says it like this “anguish of the body or mind, the infliction of intense pain. Torture is to cause intense suffering, to punish or coerce by inflicting excruciating pain” (Merriam – Webster’s Collegiate® Dictionary). The very meaning of the word makes people cringe, but torture has been something that we have carried …show more content…
Then others saying in certain circumstances torture should be used. From the perspective of torture never being used, people bring up many good reasons to have this opinion. Some good reasons being the physical and mental consequences torture puts on the tortured. During and after one is released from the environment of torture, the victim can be haunted by many things that brings back experience of being tortured. Things like dreams, flash backs, physical sensations of pain, and many others. Not only are the tortured effected, but also the torturer the person doing the interrogating. “Torture is done by ordinary people – by people just like you and me. But the act of torturing – of engaging in this fundamental violation of other human beings – has a way of transforming one into a broken person, often incapable of finding a happy, peaceful life in the world around you. In this sense, torture produces the inhuman; the inhuman does not produce torture” (Wisnewski 185). “Many former torturers, as well as those who have engaged in routine violence against others, often suffer from a type of Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder that emerges from engaging in actions like torture or assassination” (Wisnewski 195). Lastly, on the case against torture we have the Christian perspective. I know this may be simple but Jesus commands us to love your neighbor as yourself …show more content…
Some people when you talk about torture only thinks of extreme circumstances like the Holocaust; while others think about the simple but painful techniques to gather information. Taking all of this into consideration, to say that torture should never be used because its inhumane. We should think what kind of definition or torture do you have? I do agree and I will say it again “torture without purpose, when torture itself is the purpose” that is when it is wrong (Ishida 58). For torture to be allowed when it helps save lives or when it will be able to prevent death or destruction, I don’t see how that can be considered wrong. Its understanding the difference between when torture will benefit a situation in some way, or when torture is just being used in a way that is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If we use torture tactics we could prevent more major terrorist attacks. Torture is the easiest way to get information out of terrorist. The CIA would only use torture methods on Al Qaeda leaders in order to get information that may prevent future attacks. Personally I believe that these torture methods are justified because of what they do to POW’s overseas. 59% of the American society support the CIA’s methods according to new polls conducted by telephone calls.(Adam Goldman reports on terrorism and national security for The Washington Post.)…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is nothing humane about prison. Society has come to an agreement that this is a suitable punishment and has supposedly done away with torture a long time ago. I find it hard to believe that anybody would agree with his argument, as everybody makes mistakes. What if they were the ones on the other side of the whipping?…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the same time the opponents of these methods were convinced that one individual could not be an organizer of so many terrorist plots and revealed their skepticism in relation to his claims. They stated that taking into consideration the types of tortures, which could be applied to an individual, there is never a guarantee that his confessions are true to life and were not made purely with the aim to stop tortures and remain alive. This argument makes everybody doubt as for effectiveness of tortures. “For instance, a torture victim deprived of his clothes will feel so “ashamed and humiliated and cold,” said retired FBI counterterrorism agent Dan Coleman, “he 'll tell you anything you want to hear to get his clothing back. There 's no value in it.”…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The best Way to Deal with Terrorists Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If every form of death penalty is at risk of “extreme pain or torture” then no one should have to do die by being executed. Sentencing someone to death denies them the right to life – enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Right(Amnesty). The traditional method of death by hanging was also easily bungled: If the drop was too short, there would be a slow and agonizing death by strangulation; if the drop was too long, the individual’s head would be torn off (Aclu). Absolutely no one should have to die by having their head torn off or by strangulation, and if the death penalty has risks that big then nobody should have to be a victim of this cruel…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who have been tortured are most certain to agree with keeping the ban. The victims of torture will never forget their experience and will continue to suffer for the rest of their lives. The mental and physical cost of torture can’t be disregarded. Not only is it physically and emotionally painful, it is also physically and emotionally traumatizing. For critics of the punishment and interrogation method, gaining information through the use of pain is incredibly barbaric and heinous.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Torture to sum has many aspects of pro and con but for the United States torture can be greatly helpful in providing information that otherwise without it would kill many innocent people. If we were able to prevent the september eleventh attacks, thousands of lives would have been saved, along with billions of dollars in economic damage. Intelligence agents had information that Osama bin Laden was up to something, but they had nothing specific as to place and time. Today, the FBI and CIA are in the same situation. The next attack could involve a nuclear "dirty" bomb, an anthrax or smallpox bioweapons attack, or a poisonous chemical attack.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture, just like the death penalty is something that is very controversial and widely discussed. People often have differing opinions and even more often they bring morality into it. No one considered the…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, however, different forms of inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment as well as torture are practised in all parts of the world, including highly industrialised and developed countries. Despite the fact that society is evolving, the effect of torture remains the same: such violations of human rights result in serious harm to the human being, to his physical and mental immunity, and requires a lot of effort to make it stop. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) says: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” . For many years international legal institutions have been developing, improving and consolidating different ways of resolving the problem. At…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (The Mental Health Consequences of Torture, Page 196). The chapter looks at the…

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conor Lenahan Professor Lavergne Proposal for Research Paper December 9, 2015 Guantanamo Bay and Censorship of the Media The United States is and always will be a beacon of freedom, and fair treatment correct? Not necessarily.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of torture in the war on terror should be strictly forbidden because it explicitly breaks international laws, violates the basics of human dignity, and lacks substance in a consequentialist argument. Each nation is obligated to provide and protect the right to security and life for all its citizens. Any state must ensure protection of its citizens from torture because not only is its use unequivocally forbidden by several international laws, but also because it is a universal human right. Also, torture cannot be justified through a moral or consequentialist argument by any means. To keep their legitimacy, states must follow the standards of human rights when protecting their citizens from terrorist attacks or…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Desperate Times Would you ever hurt someone? What if hurting that someone meant that you would be seen as a hero amongst many? What if hurting someone meant that you were able to save innocent lives? What if hurting someone meant that you lost a piece of yourself and what it means to be human? `The topic at hand is if it is ever justifiable to torture someone under any circumstance.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The idea of humanism in Europe began to denounce the English Bill of Rights in 1689, and with it condemned “cruel and unusual punishment” (Luban, 2010). Regardless, extreme methods of torture, such as boiling, castration, drowning, oxygen deprivation, tickle torture, tooth extraction, electric shock, and whippings, were used until the…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays