Nuclear Weapons Persuasive Essay

Improved Essays
After seeing and hearing about the destruction of the Trinity test, many scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project lost enthusiasm. They realized the amount of devastation that the bomb they created would bring if used as a weapon. Many scientists fought against the production of more atomic bombs. Some even quit the Manhattan Project due to moral reasons. They did not want to be a part of the massive casualties these bombs would bring. After the success of the Trinity test, the United States sent the Potsdam Proclamation to Japan. This letter demanded Japans surrender in the war. When Japan refused, the United States faced what would become one of the most controversial decisions in history.
The United States was in the midst of
…show more content…
7,500 of which are in Russia and 7,200 in the United States.12 Nuclear Weapons have advanced so much that if a nuclear war broke out, the end of the world is a feasible possibility. Debate continues every day whether the presence of nuclear weapons does any good. Does having nuclear weapons give citizens a sense of safety? The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons has many large scale nuclear superpowers like the United States and Russia. This is a “treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament.”13 Some countries like India, Israel, and Pakistan have not signed the treaty, yet still have nuclear weapons that raise concern. The world has seen the devastation that nuclear weapons can cause from the events of World War II. Knowing that mass destruction can occur at the push of a button strikes fear in the world. The dangers these weapons create are just too large to go unhandled. The world does not need nuclear weapons and every country should be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Would the cold war have been a cold war, would weapons have been used instead? Could the United States or the U.S.S.R have used an atomic bomb on the other nation? Even if the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not the moral thing to do, you have to look on the positive side of things. Somebody had to be used as an example to show what nuclear warfare was capable of. Now every nation has a form of nuclear warfare but nobody has used it.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is why many scientist spoke up when they heard how the bomb was being used and who it was being used against. In the being American first intended to target Germany with the atomic bomb, but when Germany surrender there was no point in dropping the bomb on them. If American would have did that, it would have made them look like a real bully. Way before the bombs were even dropped on Japan, many scientists, at the Chicago metallurgical laboratory, were against the bomb being dropped on Japan and felt like it would cause the world to be destroyed. The scientists were concerned about the dangers of nuclear power and that it would threaten civilizations.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Weapons Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    World War 2 is considered one of the bloodiest wars in our history. It was the first time the world witnessed the destructive power of newly developed nuclear weapons by the Americans. It was the use of nuclear bombs that officially ended the war, but yet a lot of people condemned the United States for using such frightening and destructive weapons due to multiple reasons such as the deaths of innocent Japanese civilians, the probability of the use of such weapons in future wars which can cause further deaths and other negative effects that the nuclear weapons may cause. Although the use of nuclear weapons may seem immoral and they are indeed very frightening and destructive, America was justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan in 1945.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These situations would’ve already made it difficult for the Japanese to continue “to carry on a large-scale war.” (Doc B) The U.S., however, did not just want to make it difficult for the Japanese to continue, but wanted to guarantee a defeat against the nation that violated them the most. Threats of destruction did not cause the Japanese to surrender, so anything short of the atomic bomb may not have worked to cause them to surrender. While the U.S. directed the force at Japan, the U.S. also had in mind the desire to show the entire world the force that it had within its grasp. The U.S. wanted to be seen as a superpower and the atomic bomb was undeniably a power play using such a mighty…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 16, 1945, Truman received news that the first ever atomic bomb was ready to be tested. This weapon was by no means just an experiment meant to store away and have in the event that conflict broke out and the US needed an effective way to protect itself from the offenders. The creation behind this weapon was solely to force Japan to surrender and allow the end of World War II. However, using it had been questionable ever since its initial creation, and especially after it had been tested for effectiveness. A weapon as powerful as the atomic bomb would cause a vast amount of death and destruction, the morality of using it was constantly questioned in different aspects.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discursive essay on whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was entirely justifiable The argument to whether the dropping of the atomic bomb was entirely justifiable has been quite controversial. This is due to the cause that it had negative influences on Japan however America was trying to defend their country as it has been stated that Japan most likely would not have surrendered. Though, the Japanese did suffer with casualties of their civilians and soldiers. The Americans had reasons to drop the atomic bomb. As stated previously the Americans were worried about their life and wanted to end the World War 2 by dropping the bomb.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    World leaders should be able to secure their citizens from both internal and external threats. Nuclear weapons is an example of security from external threats, even though it causes so much destruction, also, it is a factor on why nuclear weapons still exist. Stockpiling nuclear weapons will give a higher leverage over enemies and prevent them from unwanted attacks, however, these are weapons that can literally blow up the Earth multiple times. Something that can cause massive destruction will not keep anyone safe, it will cause more problems and increase tensions with rivals. Robert Oppenheimer, who is known as the father of nuclear bombs because he created the first nuclear bomb, regrets creating it due to the power it possesses and the damage it can do and the that the world we live in is not safe with these nuclear weapons (Walker, Countdown to Zero).…

    • 1754 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WWII Was Justified

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    So, if we compare this to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US gave Japan many chances for them to surrender, and informed them about the outcome if they were to refuse. So, overall, for those who argued that Japanese endured many hardships due to the bombs, it did not justify their actions at Pearl Habour because that eventually led to the US to resort to the last method and this proved the bomb use was…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since the Treaty was enforced by nuclear powers in our scenario, and rational leaders would be deterred by this fact before violating the Treaty. However, due to Hitler’s ambition for empire, he can be categorized as an irrational leader, so I don’t believe he would be deterred by nuclear weapons. For Hitler, undoing the Treaty was the first step in accomplishing his desire for empire. Besides, at a times when Germany started violating the Treaty, countries worldwide were suffering from Great Depression, France and Britain were still recovering from WWI. From Hitler’s point of view, the French and British were too weak to enforce the Treaty.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays