The Mandate System Essay

Improved Essays
The Mandates created by the European Powers were, in their own language, made to protect the “peoples’ not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world.” The purpose was not the installation governing bodies akin to the ones established during the 17th and 18th centuries of European Colonialism, but instead, European nations were intended to look after these countries “well-being and development” in order to create nations capable of one day governing themselves. On paper, this is a noble and righteous action taken by the European powers. However, in reality this decision to create states by indiscriminately drawing lines on a map proved to be extremely detrimental to the development of the region, and …show more content…
The agreement known now as the Sykes-Picot Agreement, was a under the table compromise between the British, Mark Sykes, and the French, François Georges-Picot, which effectively divided the Ottoman territories they expected to inherit as a result of a victory in WWI. The proposed sphere of influence in the Middle East began on the Anatolian Peninsula north of Crete, ran north to the Black Sea, from there moved south to the Persian Gulf, then west to the Gulf of Aqaba, extending onto the Sinai Peninsula where it then reconnected with the Mediterranean Sea to create a territory covering the entirety of the western portion of the Middle East. An area that today is made up of nearly ten sovereign states, was to be under the direct, or semi-direct control of France, Russia or Britain. The Mandate system that was to control these areas of land was broken down further into sub-categories of Class A, Class B, and Class C. The class assigned to a region was used to delineate that territories ability to governor themselves and was most heavily dependent on geographic location, and existing industrial infrastructure. The Class A Mandates were exclusive to the former Turkish Provinces of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, and were considered sufficiently able to rule over themselves, but were still subject to Allied administrative control over various segments of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The philosophers and political researchers Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri also have a philosophical theory about a type of human interaction which extends past globalization, which they call Empire. However, it does not adopt the same generally positive and optimistic tone that Appiah takes. Instead, their view is that this tend towards increased interdependency has began the creation of a homogeneous, monolithic power structure known as Empire. At the outset, this view of power relates to Thomas Hobbes’ views about the power of the state over the governed and the contract between the governed and the centralizing governing body (Hardt 7). Hardt and Negri give credit to earlier theorists who initially extrapolated Hobbes’ theories, assigning…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stated in document one, the areas “Shall Be allowed to establish such direct or indirect administration or control as they desire and as they think fit to arrange with the Arab state or confederation of Arab states.” This demonstrates that Britain and France promised the Arab people “That France and…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    World War Dbq

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unequal Distribution of Blame A disastrous and chaotic time period of unconsolable mothers, wives, and children being left without the love of their family members and having to mourn on their deaths, was the result of something that could have been avoided, but was caused by confusion and pride. Europe was an envied nation due to their advance in technology, art, and music. Everything seemed to be going too well for the Europeans, but soon enough, everything changed. Europe had hope of creating a system which balanced the amount of power each nation had, in order to diminish the chances of one nation taking over the other, but many complications made it difficult for that plan to work out.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their spoils were the territory of the fallen Ottoman Empire. They controlled this territory under the mandate system. Under this system, the territories were under the control of a sovereign state, in this case Britain and France, because they were not ready to run themselves. Furthermore, this system was supposed to take into account the needs and wants of the territories being mandated.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros and Cons of American Imperialism America is one of the most powerful nations of the world. Its sheer size, economy, territories, and technological advancements make it so influential that many smaller nations or cultures look up to America as if it were a god. Many decades ago, America established its dominance over other nations, particularly during the two world wars by showing off its military prowess and interfering with what are supposedly local affairs of other governments. Imperialism is more of a negative idea than a positive one – it signifies a nation's thirst for expansion at the expense of others.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As soon as the Ottoman Empire sided with the central powers, the entente powers, consisting of Britain, France, and Russia, began making plans to pick apart the empire after the war. This led to a huge land rush in the Middle East and Africa, with European and American powers seeking influence in the region. Following the war, state building took the forms of diplomacy and revolutions. The geographical and economic interests of Britain, France, and the other entente powers would determine how states were treated, or rather how directly they would be exploited. In the Levant and Mesopotamia regions, a new state system was brought territories of Israel Palestine, Jordan, Syria, and Iran, which was formally the Persian Empire.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Accountability is what the United States Army revolves around. Without accountability the United States Army would be chaos. But I digress. The definition of accountability is the fact or condition of being accountable or held responsible. There is no progress within yourself, your team, your life without accountability.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DBQ Sovereignty Essay

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Multiple Choice Answers: 1) D 2) D 3) D 4) D 5) D 6) E 7) B 8) D 9) D 10) E Essay Question #1 1. Sovereignty a. Definition i. Class- The common definition that was giving in class was that sovereignty is the right of the state to have country of its people.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Mandatory release affect the correctional system due to once the inmate is been released from prison, now will be under parole, and will be part of the community supervision process. This means more supervision, another case to the POs, more paperwork and guidelines to obey. Before an inmate is release, the decision to release this person will be based on parole guidelines, and of course it is mandatory that the individual has served half of the sentenced given, which is equal to the amount of time given. The Board members will not release a person if that person is not ready yet, even if that individual has already been served the required time.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 23 Margin Notes- Independence and Development in the Global South 1) What was distinctive about the end of Europe’s African and Asian empires compared to other cases of imperial disintegration? Europe’s African and Aisian empires were distinctive compared to other cases of imperial disintegration, because no other empire had been so centralized on the ideology of mobilization of masses. None of the other empires had been an excess of nation-states, each claiming an equal place in the world of nation-states either.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Imperialism Analysis

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lastly, the continent Africa, which was fought over by European countries, was divided in parts and its parts were allocated to countries like England and France (Doc A). These nations convened and met at a conference in Berlin in 1884 and 1885 to part Africa (BGE). In these countries’ quest to claim lands, they strongly and substantially suggest the competition between them for power, for glory, for prestige, and for…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sovereignty is one of the most controversial ideas in political science. Many philosophers have written on this concept, and each of them interprets it differently. In this essay, I focus on Thomas Pogge’s conception of sovereignty that is largely influenced by liberalism. Pogge argues for a multi-layered scheme where borders could be redrawn more easily.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Countries in Europe were broken into pieces as well so there was no actual authority. Therefore, there was no danger for small states to expand their…

    • 1825 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Decolonization of British India In the 20th century, technology was integrating the world web. Politics brought mainly disintegrations reflected in World War I and II. Moreover, the industrial powers involved in those wars lost their empires. A larger burst of decolonization came after 1943, when colonies started to fight for their dependency under the tensions of total war, the diffusion of information in general and the art of political mobilization.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 19th century, some powerful European countries expanded their countries to new territories, known as "colonialism." Both colonialism and contemporary globalization can lead to inter-state relations. In this article, I will compare Colonialism and contemporary globalization. Colonialism is defined as a policy or practice of "full or partial political control over another country, its occupation of settlers and its economic exploitation". Globalization means the integration of economy, finance, trade and communication on a global scale.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays