Tribunes In Roman Tribes

Great Essays
While Rome was officially a republic, not all forms of authority believed all Romans

were created as equals. Among the higher ranks of Roman politics were Tribunes, men selected

by various parties to lobby in specific areas of the government. While the word “Tribune” is

often used as a generalized term, there existed three major types of Tribunes.

The word “Tribune” is a derivative of the Roman Tribes. The three tribes were divided

into three groups – Tities, Ramnes, and Luceres. Each tribe was led by a single Tribune that

represented his party in Religious, Militant, and Civil objectives.

During the period in which Rome was governed by a Monarchy, The Tribune of the

Celeres was a single tribune that commanded the King’s personal
…show more content…
While Cassius and Flavius are both heartfelt change-seekers, Flavius is

depicted as a lesser man.

Marulus, unlike Flavius, seems to be in the cause, simply because his brethren are. While

he has his reasons for disliking Caesar, Marulus seems to be along to support Flavius, not the

overall outcome of their cause.

Clues in the text point out that Marulus and Flavius are the weaker side of the rebellion,

but are definitely worried about Caesar’s actions. It is possible that they worry about this man

because of his influence. While, yes, Rome was a republic at the time, Caesar could’ve easily

spoken to the right people and have Marulus and Flavius stripped of their titles.

At the same time, it seems that Flavius and Marulus are a low-standard in terms of

rebellion against Caesar. While they fear that he will pose a threat to them, they aren’t fully

willing to be all-in to the cause of overthrowing Caesar.

Yes, they are willing to be public about their feelings towards the new Roman Celebrity,

but in the end they will most like flicker out and die because they aren’t completely

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rise Of Rome Dbq

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Introduction After asserting its independence, Rome was led by dictators and consuls all from the aristroctrats. The revolt, after all, had been led by the nobles. Yet the commoners of Rome, the plebeians, were the larger part and demanded more equal and political rights. Inspired by Greek tales of democracy and made determined by the increasing hardships face by the ordinary commoner the plebeians demanded more equality.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gracchi Brothers Rebellion

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Logically, the tribunes should have realized that their open rebellion against government colleagues would only decrease nationalism and desire to serve their country. Finally, the Gracchis were the greatest source of polarization in the late Roman Republic. They deliberately called attention to issues that they were incompetent in addressing, and encouraged disloyalty and distrust against the succeeding governments. In summary, the Gracchis destroyed the Roman Republic by polarizing the Roman populace, creating unnecessary schisms among the divided Senate, and further destabilizing the…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Ancient Rome

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ancient Rome was one of the more well known empires in history. Even though there were some disputes within Rome as it was growing, they still were able to expand and build an even larger empire and even reach, what historians call the ¨Pax Romana¨, which was their time of peace among the people. In about 750 BCE there were no signs of infighting and everything was going smoothly. However, under the surface of what was going on, these old disputes were almost all about their government. Rome went from being a republic to an empire, then eventually a dictatorship, which meant that they were a very undecided and organized culture.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After “Caesar’s Civil War”, Caesar was in power. The Senate had already lost once to Caesar, and Caesar had the loyalty of the people. As said by Plutarch, Caesar was a very talented speaker and connected well with the common people. Caesar followed in his uncle’s footsteps supporting the people and made many political reforms that benefited the people. For example, Caesar added a law that limited the number of slaves that estates could employ.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Carthage's government was like the Roman republic in many ways, but had some significant differences. A similar aspect to Rome of Carthage's government is it had two suffetes, lead magistrates, who had similar functions as Roman consuls. As well as suffetes, Carthage have a group of elders called the “hundred” which had a striking resemblance to the senate, and an assembly called “the people” like the comitia. However, the similarities stopped there. Carthage had one advantage that Rome did not, which was a chief of military who would stay in his office for a longer period of time.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar is upheld as one of the most influential politicians of European history. Caesar was truly influential for every man and women of Rome. Caesar was successful in the battle field and had a large group of dedicated followers, but more importantly Caesar caused some anger and some extreme hatred towards himself. Julius Caesar was assassinated because the people of Rome stood firmly against a tyrant, rumors regarding Julius Caesar caused fear and uncertainty of Rome’s future, and people had personal vindications against Caesar himself. Romans prided themselves on their involvement in their government with their right to vote.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    4. What factors characterized the interactions of “civilized, settled” societies which were nomadic? Look at the Huns, Vikings, and the Mongols. In what ways did they values of these societies differ? Thier social structure?…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion I ultimately believe that Brutus will turn on Caesar due to what Cassius is feeding him. Cassius states “ do you content, good Cinna take this paper and look you lay in the chair where Brutus may bout find it .” Cassius keeps planting doubt in Brutus mind. Caesar will ultimately fall, and will not satisfy his people; Flavius and Malvious will not stop until Caesar pays for his actions towards Pompay. Cassius is trying to get Casca on his side because, Casca is also a tribute to the people.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    never repay them. ”(p. 52) In this quote, it is shown Caesar not only bribed his way into higher positions, but he did so with money he stole from other people, his people. No person let alone a leader of men should act as a common thief, and what is even worse is the fact he had to abuse his power and authority to acquire the money from those beneath him.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Julius Caesar Quotes

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the play, Cassius is a very suspicious man and mostly stays quiet, which is one of the reasons why Caesar does not trust him. In the text he says “[Cassius] thinks too much: such men are dangerous,” (1.2.195). This is one of the only instances where Caesar shows his disloyal side.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Death of Caesar” by Barry Strauss, tells the story of history’s most famous assassination, the assassination of Julius Caesar. Caesar was a military dictator and in line for the crown until the Ides of March 44 B.C. when he was betrayed by his best friend and murdered. This was result of a civil war in Rome. As Caesar began to gain power he became an obvious threat to the Roman Republic.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without Caesar’s sudden popularity, he would not be in power. Because he manipulates and captures the attention of all Romans, they are attracted to him. Cassius explains this to Brutus as he tries to convince Brutus to join the conspiracy, telling him, “I was born free as Caesar. So were you. /…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rome had elections for the people of this republic so that they could pick two consuls who for one year controlled the military, and ten tribunes who would represent the people in the government. In times of political distress the Roman people would pick one dictator to rule over the empire until everything was back to order. The rules and laws that the tribunes established were used to govern the territories. The cities of these territories would post the rules up in their town forum where all citizens of the cities could see it. One primary source that helps show the efficiency of the Roman Empire is a series of “rules incised on ten plates of bronze for public display in the town’s forum.”…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He reminded the people that Caesar would have ruined Rome, become a tyrant and would have enslaved everyone, he said "had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead?". He says this as a rhetorical question: it has quite an obvious answer but probably would have been false anyway. Brutus says that last quote like it is fact and that it will happen. The fact makes it seem more real.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays