The 2016 presidential election is fast approaching, and as I write this it is official that the presidency will be between the Republican nominee Donald J. Trump, and the Democratic nominee Hillary R. Clinton. It wasn’t quite simple for me to choose between the two nominees. Hence, I doubt that neither of them are creditable enough to serve the country. Most likely the majority of Americans will speculate that they do not have a preference between the two candidates. Nevertheless, I evaluated information in reference to the candidates’ individual strengths and weaknesses. Also, to convince me more I tapped into the national issues that are being debated, and identify the candidates’ position on the matters whether they are strong or weak, and
…show more content…
I thoughtfully accepted that she can be countered by the majority of the nations’ leaders if she is heading the wrong direction. Also, it is a plus factor that she has gained experience in politics, knowing the “gateways and exits” in politics. In addition, she has an acceptable proposition on trade. Nevertheless, her strengths can be weaknesses too. The first major weakness of Clinton is her email-scandal issue. It disputes her credibility and sincerity to serve the American people. Also, she is tarnished by being a corrupt, fraud, and double-dealing politician. Moreover, her immigration program encourages illegal …show more content…
First, I would like to address the issue of immigration. The Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, vehemently supports a strict regulation of immigration. As seen on the news, he repeatedly pointed out about building walls, and he reprobates illegal immigrants. The strong point I perceived on this advocacy is mass immigration will be regulated, thus illegal immigration will be discouraged. I don’t disapprove people coming to America to yearn for opportunities, and I am not anti-immigrants. It is acceptable provided that the government doesn’t have to subsidize them. Also, the immigrants should enter the country legally. Migrating to America without possible employment, and adding to the unemployed-poor population will not help the economy. The downside of this is just a little part of the naturalized citizens who understandably want to be united with their families from their original countries. In contrast, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, champions immigration. As seen on the news, she promised in her interviews that she will not stop immigration. Thus, understandable to gain the votes that tremendously come from the naturalized immigrants. This advocacy is favorable to the naturalized citizens and immigrants. However, the weak points of pro-immigration is quite portentous. It encourages illegal immigrants to enter the country knowing that eventually they will be able to
I thoughtfully accepted that she can be countered by the majority of the nations’ leaders if she is heading the wrong direction. Also, it is a plus factor that she has gained experience in politics, knowing the “gateways and exits” in politics. In addition, she has an acceptable proposition on trade. Nevertheless, her strengths can be weaknesses too. The first major weakness of Clinton is her email-scandal issue. It disputes her credibility and sincerity to serve the American people. Also, she is tarnished by being a corrupt, fraud, and double-dealing politician. Moreover, her immigration program encourages illegal …show more content…
First, I would like to address the issue of immigration. The Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, vehemently supports a strict regulation of immigration. As seen on the news, he repeatedly pointed out about building walls, and he reprobates illegal immigrants. The strong point I perceived on this advocacy is mass immigration will be regulated, thus illegal immigration will be discouraged. I don’t disapprove people coming to America to yearn for opportunities, and I am not anti-immigrants. It is acceptable provided that the government doesn’t have to subsidize them. Also, the immigrants should enter the country legally. Migrating to America without possible employment, and adding to the unemployed-poor population will not help the economy. The downside of this is just a little part of the naturalized citizens who understandably want to be united with their families from their original countries. In contrast, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, champions immigration. As seen on the news, she promised in her interviews that she will not stop immigration. Thus, understandable to gain the votes that tremendously come from the naturalized immigrants. This advocacy is favorable to the naturalized citizens and immigrants. However, the weak points of pro-immigration is quite portentous. It encourages illegal immigrants to enter the country knowing that eventually they will be able to