The Louisiana Purchase Analysis

Decent Essays
With the nation expanding west, the balance of power between slave and free states became questionable. The North and South had different needs, one side being industrialized while the other was agrarian and thrived off of cash crops. Legislation that passed for one half of the nation wasn’t always helpful to the other, in fact, it was most times harmful. With these differences, both the North and the South knew it was important to have equal or more representation in the government than the other in order to protect their interests. The Louisiana Purchase, which stretched from the Gulf of Mexico to slightly beyond the Canadian border, was purchased, questions arose whether this territory would be free territory or slaveholding territory. This

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787, politicians at the Constitutional Convention created two compromises to address the population gap between the North and South (PN 187). Since representation in the House of Representatives depended on population, the Northern states received significantly more delegates due to the dramatically larger populations. In an effort to balance the representation in the House, the convention created the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted each slave as three-fifths of a person. In exchange, the South agreed to abolish the slave trade on January 1, 1808, which signaled the progressive, gradual decline of slavery in the South. The Compromise of 1787 successfully relieved sectional conflict until 1820, when tensions arose over the land acquired from the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the long term, the Louisiana Purchase expanded the fortunes of the United States and the power of the federal government immensely, but in the short term, the expanse of territory and the feeble reach of the government obliged to control it raised fears of secession and foreign interest. Although the Louisiana purchase contradicted Jefferson's constitutional view, the purchase initially benefited the United States as Jefferson fulfilled is vision of an agrarian…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is highly recommended that any American reads this book. For something that at most gets a page worth's' mention, the Louisiana Purchase was actually quite a long, complicated conflict. After reading the book, a sense of respect and gratitude forms for the entire western part of America. It is noteworthy that America had very little control over its destiny. The Louisiana Territory was made for Americans.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Tension

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory in 1803, the elephant in the room was how the newfound windfall of land would be implemented in the United States of America. By 1820 the issue had come to the forefront of politics, the North didn’t want slavery to expand, and the South was in opposition. Eventually, Henry Clay came up with the Missouri Compromise, which for the time being resolved the tension. Rising tension became a trend throughout Manifest Destiny and the rest of the Antebellum period. In the period circa 1845-1861, the various issues and compromises made both sides angry at the other, therefore propelling the Civil War into existence.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Louisiana Purchase Thomas Jefferson was an active hero, a spokesman for democracy, and the third president of these United States of America. As president, he was always faced with diversity; whether it was dealing with the Barbary pirates in the middle east, belligerent British trade policies, and even the greatest acquirement of all time: the Louisiana Purchase. The Louisiana purchase was one of the best procurements that could have happened to this great nation. That is why The purchase of Louisiana held no significant moral dilemmas for President Thomas Jefferson, because it benefited the nation by growing more than double the size of the United states, gave the country complete control of the port of New Orleans, and provided territory…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For most Americans, the Louisiana Purchase is regarded as one of the most influential treaties of our nation in expanding its borders and securing its status as a world powerhouse in political dominance. However, a significant yet otherwise subdued dilemma the Louisiana Purchase treaty caused was an unconstitutional expansion of federal powers, specifically with regards to the president. Robert Knowles argues that the assumed expansion of federal powers to include additions of states and integration into the union significantly hindered the balance between federal powers and state powers, granting the former much more importance in the “empire of liberty” model.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between the years of 1820-1860, there were a few disagreements with many American citizens. In 1820 the New Louisiana territory was known as a free state because of the Missouri Compromise. This Compromise sounded really promising to many slaves, but others disagree with it because many American citizens relied on these slaves. Later, other states were being known as Free states which made some American angry because they couldn’t have any slaves of their own, depending on where they live.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery Dbq

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the Revolution, Northern and Southern states found themselves diverging on several political, economic, and social topics, including slavery. However, the two regions still found some common ground in spite of their differing views. Despite abolishing slavery in the North, Northern whites didn’t take the necessary measures to abolish slavery in the South and create equality between whites and blacks until they found it beneficial for themselves. Even with the growing divide between the North and South, both sides’ actions ultimately upheld white hegemony throughout the country.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the founding of the U.S. a struggle for economic power has existed. John C. Calhoun voiced the opinion of countless southern farmers, on the tariff of abominations. “the proposed tariff was in fact little more than “an immense tax on one portion of the community to put money into the pockets of another.” The Northern and Southern states evolved into two very different territories, because of their vastly different economies. The diverse needs of the different economies caused economic policies controversial, because each policy could only support one economy.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In 1820-1850

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the years between 1820 and 1850, the controversy of sectionalism and slavery was very much alive. The South wanted to use slaves as a way to keep their fragile economy stable, but the moral contradictions of owning other people was too much for many in the North. And with the growing popularity of expanding the country westward, a new issue was created regarding how new territories would decide their slavery status. Westward expansion impacted the development of sectionalism from 1820-1850 in the United States politically due to Manifest Destiny, a harmful ideology that drove white Americans into the West in the first place, the Missouri Compromise, an amendment prohibiting the use slaves above the Louisiana Territory line, and the Wilmot Proviso, which further tried to prohibit slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Commissioner of South Carolina, John Smith Preston, believes that “the South cannot exist without slavery…” (Page 72) which is why South Carolina was the first to succeed from the Union. Southerners did not want to put and end to slavery, therefore creating this uprising that influenced many factors such as states rights, the economy, and the state as a whole. With the many states succeeding in effort to dissolve the Union, politics played a big role between the North and the South. Dew realized that time and time again, in all the commissioners’ speeches and letters, slavery was always the main topic brought up along with other brief topics discussed in this book.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the contrary, Calhoun points out that “the North has absolute control over the government [while] the interests of the South will be sacrificed to the North” (United States). Particularly, the North wanted to abolish slavery. To balance the North and South, the North would have to amend the Constitution to restore power to the South. The ongoing debate on slavery put into prospective each state regarding its laws on the admission or ban of slaves. With its growing population and necessity for more natural resources, Americans wanted the United States to expand westward to increase its power and productivity.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays