Chapter Summary Of The Book 'The Logic Of American Politics'

Good Essays
Notably, the book (The Logic Of American Politics) is full of interesting facts; some are more similar than you think. In fact, chapter one discusses The Logic of American Politics, which lead to the development of The Constitution in chapter two. In relation to that, chapter three explains Federalism, which created the need for Civil Rights. In turn, Chapter five concludes the relationship between the chapters with Civil Liberties. While reading, I have acknowledged that chapters one through five are different in several ways, however, they can be tied together in relation to one another due to shared facts. Initially, The Logic of American Politics begins explaining the necessity of institutional design. Institutional design consists of several steps in collective action, such as, delegations, command authority, and vetoes. These actions are oftenly referred to as The Framer 's Tool Kit. In other words, delegations are set in place when groups, organizations, or people get together and nominate someone to make decisions for them and represent various areas. Subsequently, command authority gives its holder the ability to control certain aspects of our nation. For …show more content…
The Bill of Rights limits the range of power the federal government can possess. Likewise, civil liberties are rooted in Bill of Rights and they were designed to protect the people from the government. Civil liberties were important to the American people because it ensures that the public can not violate laws that people are entitled to. With that being said, if the government denies someone their civil liberties or violates them it is illegal. Civil rights and civil liberties are so closely related, because they both were intended to be for the good of the people. Both protect the people from harsh or unnecessary government control. Thusly, they limit the amount of power any branch of government is able to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    And if a government could perform their role in protecting people’s right, no harm should occur to such a society. Civil disobedience is a political act that should be exercised with a good aim to fight for public goods. It’s also crucial to be peaceful and non-violent. Civil disobedience exposes society to harm. It may encourage disrespect towards legal system, it could paralyze financial development and interfere with people’s daily living.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order to stop this type of violence, states must institute policies aimed at human rights protection. To protect human rights is to ensure that people receive some decent humane treatment. Also introducing political systems that protect human rights are thought to reduce the threat of world conflict. International human rights law protects the right to life and physical integrity and attempt to limit the unrestrained power of the state. These laws are to protect humanity against anything that challenges people’s health, economic, and political peace.…

    • 1866 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “[T]he severity of penalties is only a vain resource, invented by little minds to substitute terror for that respect which they have no means of obtaining” . Thus, according to Rousseau the government should make the laws match the general will of the people additionally instead of using punishment and terror the government should try to prevent it in the first place and “establish the reign of virtue” , which will contribute to the prevention of crimes in the state. The term “morality” has a huge importance within the limits of the state and especially the civil state that is conducted upon the social contract. In order to reach mortality citizens need to become virtuous and come together for the common good and the general will of the state. When Citizens understand the significance of laws to their common good, they will start to respect them and act accordingly to their duties.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of civil liberties, they were made more so for the protection against government which may become tyrannical. Civil Rights on the other hand are meant to protect against discrimination against a specific group or designation of people,…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All of this is to avoid a government being dissolved, but if so, overthrowing that government is acceptable, as long as it is for the benefit of the society. The Legislative Branch is the supreme power in Locke’s mind, as he believes it will keep the society from corruption. The rules for Locke’s society relate to trusteeship and accepting the decisions of society, and as the people do this they will establish and put trust in the legislative power, as the laws require. Locke says,…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The system of checks and balances helps to protect the best interest of the people and the United States as a whole. The answer to help keep our government from the corruption of power is to have a system of Checks and Balances. Without the system of checks and balances America runs the risk of the government becoming too powerful, and put the country at risk in many ways, from war to another country or tyrant taking America by force. It is true that power is a very dangerous thing, the system of checks and balances is needed, there needs to be a watchful eye on all branches of government. I believe the system of checks and balances provides a sense of comfort among the people of the United…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    R2p State Sovereignty

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages

    With the creation of R2P state sovereignty begins to be considered in terms of responsibility for the populace rather than just territory. The conversation that R2P creates is one in which the original ideals of state sovereignty are being challenged and the emergence of a more conscious aim to protect humans and not those who abuse them comes to light. Since the principle advocates the responsibility that the state has in protecting its citizens from things such as crimes against humanity, the priority of a nation shifts to the safety of its people. Changing the focus of the sovereign makes for the population to be less likely to endure human right violations which is ultimately the most important thing. The integration of R2P also makes it so that states are held responsible when failing to protect its citizens.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government is not only indebted to pass and implement laws to uphold order, however the government is also obligated to uphold the customary outlines of social affairs. The efficient order that the can uphold is through government legislation, explanation of the law, and prosecution of the law. In conclusion freedom is one of the key perceptions that the government must follow for its people. Freedom is identified as liberty and gives an individual the right to do certain things without limitation. Freedom promises individuals with many limited rights and shields them from terror.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, both were advocates for individual freedom, and liberty through democracy. Mill and Tocqueville both feared tyranny, and promoted democracy so that citizens could have individual liberties, and thoughts. Mill’s ideal citizen in a democracy would be participatory, and opinionated in their beliefs. His citizen would not curtail any other citizen’s belief, no matter how far off of their beliefs it is. Tocqueville’s ideal citizen would be one who participates at a local level of politics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The harm principle ensures that self-ruling and self-governance is implemented in society to the extent that it does not damage people in the process. In order to better understand the harm principle, we must take a deeper look into Mill’s theoretical approach of the concept. He first beings with distinguishing a difference between what is harm and a mere offence (Brink 2007, ch.3.6, para. 2). Harm is an action that is “injurious or set[s] back important interest[s] of particular people, interests in which they have rights,” whereas a mere offence is something that Mill’s does not see as a defence under the harm principle (Brink 2007, ch.3.6, para.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays