Chris Mooney Unscientific America Analysis

Great Essays
In the Living on Earth radio segment the host interviews Chris Mooney, the author of the book Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future. The host and Mooney discuses a 2009 Pew Research center poll that found that most Americans don’t believe humans have induced climate change. Mooney argues in the interview — and in his book— that there is a growing gap between scientists and the public. He argues that sciences has been politicalized in recent year, and he mentions another Pew Poll that found that Republicans— even well educated Republicans are less likely to admit Climate Change is human induced. Additionally, Democrats in the past have also been critical of certain medical vaccinations, thus he finds that both …show more content…
However, I would argue they don’t offer a clear solution to address this problem. Mooney suggest that science students should increase their engagement with politics and communications; however, I would argue, science might become even more political. I completely agree that the scientific community has a public relations problem, but I think the the real problem here is America’s education system. Instead on just relying on training scientists to be effective communicators, society should attempt to advance the knowledge of all people. Even just ensuring that people understand the scientific method is a step in the right direction. Additionally, it is important that people understands that it is healthy to ask questions and raise concerns, but people need to learn that not every concern is valid. Skepticism is needed in a free society, and science can often only be conducted in a free society, but this does not mean we shouldn’t believe what the scientific community discovers about the world around us. Thus, the real solution is a free educated society. Thus, I would argue that the solution is not just making science “popular” by integrating into pop culture, but instead the solution is creating a better education systems in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He knows scientists’ hands are tied. There are a lot misinformation campaigns “based on bogus science or political agendas”, and scientists cannot diminish them. Skorton also recognizes that scientists are not rewarded for effective public communication; on the opposite, scientists may not be considered as “serious” scientists if they do so; therefore, scientists are not willing to communicate to the public. Furthermore, Skorton reveals that many scientists never received the proper liberal arts education that enables them to effectively communicate to the public. By showing his understanding toward scientists, Skorton again earns his intended audiences’ trust.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 2014 article, “Why Scientists Should Embrace the Liberal Arts,” former Cornell president, David J. Skorton, argues that scientists need to find a better way to communicate their knowledge with the public. Skorton mentions that the general public often has a difficult time believing what scientists try to tell them because they cannot comprehend their jargon. He believes this is happening because scientists lack the skills and education needed to effectively communicate their ideas to the public. Overall, the main goal of Skorton’s article is to display the disconnect between the public and scientists. Based on the content of the paper we can infer that Skorton’s targeted audience is not only educators and scientists, but also the general…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature” Pp. 1-6 This article features a study that attempts to quantify human effect on global warming and how much we are truly causing. The paper also talks about the need for awareness of global warming to increase worldwide in order for global climate reform efforts to be made. The paper talks about how many false reports on climate change are published, and that knowing the difference between a legitimate and a fake study is important. In the end the paper supports campaigns that contribute to shrinking the consensus gap to help find a general understanding among legitimate scientists.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The chapter When scientists politicize science by Pielke mainly discusses the controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Pielke elaborates on how the debate is not scientifically framed but instead it is a matter of politics. He states that political figures state opinions and facts that they have come up with through ideology; leaving out any legitimate scientific evidence. He also discusses the fact that these debates typically are just arguments on whether or not the science is real or right; therefore the policy recommendations and implementations are left out. In fact he classifies the debate surround The Skeptical Environmentalist as a political battle rather than a political debate.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fox News establishes their credibility by referencing to experts’ opinions, like climate scientists. For example, Doug McKelway, a Fox correspondent on The Special Report, uses the “NASA scientist turned climate activist James Hanson,” to show he “also acknowledges the lull” in the planet’s temperature rising (“Climate Change Challenged”). By using this prominent and credible climatologist, Fox News gains the public’s trust and faith in their climate change opinions. James Hanson proves that Global Warming was exaggerated, once he identifies that temperatures have flat lined and have only increased a few tenths of a degree in the past decade. Dr. Robert Carter, a marine geologist, agrees with Hanson and believes that this lull in the past decade proves that climate change is natural and not caused by humans (“House Environmental Committee”).…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Rhetorical Science

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Rhetorical Science explains how a successful scientific research or founding had presented in various ways towards…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the United States government have more scientists than politicians? Paul Krugman, staff writer of The New York Times, expresses to his audience that since the government doesn’t care about science, the United States is doomed. In the article Conspiracies, Corruption and Climate, Paul Krugman writes about how the government is corrupted and the conspiracies about Hurricane Irma. Paul Krugman is a passionate and aggressive writer that knows how to get his points across and how to express his opinions so that others believe him. By thoroughly expressing his thoughts about the people in the United States government, Paul Krugman used Hurricane Irma in the beginning and the government's’ beliefs on climate change towards the end of the article.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America by the Numbers: The New Deciders with Maria Hinojosa is a PBS documentary that shows how different demographic groups are growing and exerting their strength and influence. A large amount of the data presented in the video is also confirmed in chapter 4 of the textbook “Government by the People.” Both sources indicate that America will soon be characterized not by a majority of whites, but by many other ethnic and racial groups. The textbook shows a chart estimating the 2050 racial composition of the U.S., and it predicts that only 49.1% of the population will be non-hispanic whites. The video supports this by stating that “By 2044, we will be a majority non-white nation.”…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Why Do Many Reasonable People Doubt Science,” Joel Achenbach states that the American public doubts and has an extent of fear towards scientists. According to Achenbach, people are resistant towards the science community because of internal and external factors. A few of the internal factors he remarks are: the tendency to follow the major, lack of trust, and using personal experience or experiences of people close…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cultural Consensus Summary

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Dan Kahan’s Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus, he concludes that cultural cognition, or the “tendency of individuals to form risk perceptions congenial to their values”, shapes individual beliefs on several “high-risk” issues . These issues include climate change, the disposal of nuclear waste, concealed handguns, and more. His biggest source of contention is that society cannot agree on what scientific consensus is, even when there is information available to indicate a majority or lack thereof. However, he claims that people are not unexposed or indifferent to scientific facts. Although they require scientists to make sense of raw data, they are not scientifically illiterate.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ‘American Excepcionalism’ defines America as a different nation from the other ones, based on democratic ideas and personal liberty. As Helena said, Obama was asked about this matter and his reply was ‘politically correct’ (other nations also thought of its own ‘excepcionalism’). I think the same as the USA governor, every country in the world has its good features and its bad ones, so one nation cannot be better than the rest, because they differ from several political characteristics. From my point of view, this idea of American excepcionalism is a force for evil, because people use this ‘slogan’ to claim that their American nation is superior.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Understanding Faulty thinking tackle climate change” author George Marshall explains the psychological reasons why we ignore climate change. The article presents many biases we employ which affect how important we deem an issue and prejudices on why we choose to ignore it. After throughly analyzing the article based on its content and use off logos, ethos, and pathos I have concluded that every UTA alumni would be able to make their own connection with any of the statements provide in the article. Thus I would happily recommend the article be published in UTA’s newspaper The Shorthorn. George selectively includes some logos in an effort to persuade and appeal to his readers.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Politicians in different parties will say what they feel their supporters feel in order to gain and maintain votes. Poltiticans will involve themselves in any area of life if it means more support. Explain parallels between the global climate change "debate" and at least 1 other complicated science concept/issue in the past, and how scientists have been perceived to "change their minds" on an issue…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The information released on climate change is often in complex scientific language, and is difficult to understand which correlates to why “only one in ten Americans (12%) correctly estimate scientific agreement at 90% or higher” (van der Linden et al. 1). These statistics indicate a grand disconnect as to how many Americans know of the severity of climate change. A considerable amount of denial is attributed to the lack of education on the issue and acceptance of false information. Skeptics consequently facilitate the idea that anthropogenic sources are not the root cause of climate change. The consequence of false information is a continuous cycle of confusion and denial.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the reasons we disagree about climate change is because we ascribe these values differently” (Hulme 112). When…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays