The Lincoln-Douglas Debate Analysis

Improved Essays
The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates between the incumbent, Stephen A. Douglas and the challenger, Abraham Lincoln. These were during the 1858 Illinois state election campaign for a Senate seat. Stephen Douglas was a member of Congress since 1843, He was a nationally prominent spokesman for the Democratic party. He was seeking reelection to a third term in the United States Senate. Lincoln was running for Douglas's Senate seat as a Republican. The campaign attracted national attention. Some people thought that the outcome would determine the ability of the Democratic party to maintain unity in the face of the divisive sectional and slavery issues. Some people thought that it would determine the viability of the Union itself. …show more content…
He insisted that power should reside at the local level and should reflect the wishes of the people. He thought that slavery would be effectively restricted for economic, geographic, and demographic reasons. He also thought that if territories were allowed to decide that they would choose to be free. In a statement at Freeport, he stated that the people could keep slavery out of their territories by withholding the protection of the local law. Douglas thought that Lincoln's effort to resolve a controversial moral question by political means could lead to civil war. He argued that the contest was between consolidation and confederation. He stated it was, "one consolidated empire" as proposed by Lincoln versus a "confederacy of sovereign and equal states" as he proposed. Lincoln said the real issue with Douglas was the issue of right and wrong . Lincoln assured southerners that he had no intention of interfering with slavery in the states where it existed. He also assured northerners that he was opposed to the political and social equality of the races. He and Douglas agreed on …show more content…
The second debate was in Freeport, Illinois on August 27, 1858. The third debate was in Jonesboro, Illinois on September 15, 1858. The fourth debate was in Charleston, Illinois on September 18, 1858. The fifth debate was in Galesburg, Illinois on October 7, 1858. The sixth debate was in Quincy, Illinois on October 13,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Northern Democrats nominated Stephen Douglass as their candidate. He was a supporter of slavery, and hoped to gain support from the South on this issue. However, the South did not like Stephen Douglass because he was a supporter of popular sovereignty. Therefore, the Southern Democrats nominated John C. Breckenridge as their presidential candidate. The Republicans seeing that the Democrats had two candidates knew that they had a very good chance to win the election.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln stated that the point of his debates was not to abolish slavery in the old southern states but to stop it from spreading to the newer territories acquired in the…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disagreements in political decisions became a large dividing factor between the North and the South, along with the growing disagreements between the North and the South in ideology. Even from the founding of the country the North and South had been divided. The Nullification crisis was the first event that highlighted the division between the North and South. The nullification crisis was the confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–33 over the former's attempt to declare null and void within the state the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. The disagreement on the secession of South Carolina caused further disagreements between the North and South (Document A).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Doc. E). This basically put the nail in the coffin for the hopes of compromises and predicted the violent war that is approaching. In his speech on October 15, 1858 Abraham Lincoln talks about his thoughts on slavery. “Is it on this same mighty,…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Radical Abolitions

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States in the mid-19th century was as divided as ever. Conflict between anti- slavery North and pro-slavery South arose due to new states forming and whether slavery would be implemented into these new states. There was also division inside these two groups, more specifically, the Anti Slavery North. The Abolitionists were divided into two groups, the Radical Abolitionists, headlined by Frederick Douglas and William Lloyd Garrison, and the Anti-Slavery Republicans, headlined by Abraham Lincoln. The book, The Radical and the Republican, by James Oakes focuses on the impact that Frederick Douglas and Abraham Lincoln had on each other through their different views which led to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the right of representing Illinois in the Senate, Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln has a series of debates all…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Lincoln’s “Speech in Peoria,” he speaks directly about the Constitution and how, “at the framing and adoption of the constitution, they forbore to so much as mention the word ‘slave’ or ‘slavery’” (Lincoln 268) Lincoln is speaking about the new territories and how the Constitution should be issued and adopted amongst all, even the new territories that are trying to act upon popular sovereignty. Lincoln, without hesitation here, says that since the Constitution, the historical document listing all the rights the people have, does not state the word “slave” or “slavery,” the idea and act of it should not exist in the nation. In the time of his speech in Peoria, "Lincoln condemned the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 for giving slavery a new life” (Roark 372-373).…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas’s position favoring popular sovereignty flew in the face of Lincoln’s designs as so, at a debate In Freeport Illinois Lincoln asked Douglas to explain how the people of territory could exclude slavery in light of the Dred Scott ruling. Douglas’s reply became known as the Freeport Doctrine. He said, Slavery needed the protection of “local police regulations.” In any territory, citizens opposed to slavery could elect representatives who would “by unfriendly legislation” prevent the introduction of slavery. This would become Douglas’s solution as he approached the 1860 election.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics, the author, James Oakes, articulates Abraham Lincolns and Frederick Douglass’s attitudes in regard to the issue of abolition and the freedom of slaves. Whilst Frederick Douglass was inactive in politics, he was a radical heavily engaged in the abolition of slavery. On the other hand, Andrew Jackson was a diligent Republican politician who had strong notions towards the enslavement of blacks. Although they came from different backgrounds and had divergent idealistic views, ultimately they joined forces to fight for the implementation of the emancipation and the nullification of slavery.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their heated debates were primarily focusing on the issue of slavery and states’ rights. The format of the debate was the first speaker spoke for sixty minutes; the other speaker spoke for ninety minutes, and then the first speaker returned for a thirty-minute “rejoinder.” Although the senators were elected by the congress in the 19th century, Douglas and Lincoln took their debates to the public was mainly for their party’s broader election interests of aiming to become the majority in the Illinois legislature. Similar to the political rhetoric in today’s elections, Douglas tried to label Lincoln as the extreme Abolitionists to instill fear in the local suffrage; partisan politicians’ mud slinging, crushing opponents’ moral conscience or patriotism were common practices even before the two-parties…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often people think that the Civil War happened specifically because of the dispute over slavery, but there were other causes, such as popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty was where the people get to decide what happens in their state. Popular sovereignty is the main cause of the Civil War because it caused conflicts between slave states and free states as to where slavery should be allowed and the people in the states began to lean towards war and violence. The first sign of popular sovereignty not working was The Nullification Act.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    America formed many compromises to resolve political disputes between the years of 1820 and 1860. Many of political uprisings were caused by the conflict over slavery; should slavery be legal, or abolished? The Second Great Awakening was a religious reform in the early nineteenth century America, preachers like Charles Finney travelled around the world to lecture people about the importance of religion. These preachers lectured to their audience that their sins could be cleansed forever.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Election of 1860, Douglass had alienated the South and due to Dred Scott, was extremely unpopular. The Democratic party was now split as the Southern Whigs and Know-Nothings, due to this divide, the Republicans had a leg up. Lincoln said that, "The normal condition of all the territories of the United States is that of freedom." (Liberty and Power 420). The nation had four candidates to choose from, which led to such disunion.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (“The Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858.” National Parks Service, paragraph…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays