Essay On Term Limits

Improved Essays
Term limits are an extremely controversial aspect of politics that affect Michigan residents. In 1992, 59 percent of voters supported the enactment of term limits, which would limit the amount of time an elected official was legally able to hold office. Term limit supporters hoped to accomplish a number of things by enacting term limits. A few key aspects that supporters hoped to accomplish were; more competitive elections and the ability to limit the influence of interest groups on elected officials. Term limit supporters believed that term limits would create more competition by increasing the number of open seats available and also believed that limiting the maximum number of years that elected officials could serve, would limit interest …show more content…
However, they did not provide the expected changes that they had hoped to. I would argue that term limits have actually caused many negative effects; lowering the amount of competition in political races, lowering the amount of money available for parties to campaign and challenge incumbents and finally, causing challengers to wait for an easier race. While term limits have created more competition within open seat elections, it has caused challengers to wait for opportunity, which in my opinion offers the voting community less chance for change. Open seats are much easier to win for candidates versus closed seats with established incumbents. I believe that it has removed the complex nature of electoral competition. Term limits have given incumbents more power because challengers are now less likely to challenge and political parties have less funding and resources to allocate to races. Prior to term limits, challengers were faced with the option of running or giving an incumbent an even stronger chance of holding a seat hostage and it was because of this that challengers were much more likely to create a competitive campaign against incumbents for closed seats. Now, challengers have the opportunity to wait a relatively small amount of time, to avoid the great nature of electoral competition and wait for an easier opportunity for a win. It is because of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I believe that the 22nd amendment should be repealed and allow presidents in the future to serve a third or more terms. If citizens feel that the current president is doing a splendid job, then why remove that individual from office ? Although many have the perspective that 8 years is enough for an individual to hold office and that position should continuously be changed, there are times where it is not the most efficient decision. Having an entirely new president every one or two terms has led to several mistakes during a president’s first or second year in office. Although repealing the amendment would not eliminate the problems but it would definitely lessen them.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Senators originally were elected by state legislatures to six-year terms to maintain their accountability to their states and to buffer them against constant political pressures faced by House members. Ratified in 1913 as a reform, the 17th Amendment reassigned the Senate election process from legislators to citizens at large. While I respect the admirable efforts of Americans of a century ago to expand the reach of democracy, the 17th Amendment unintentionally broke the link between senators and their state government that their offices were designed to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1: What were the founders' original goals for Congress? The founders’ original goals for Congress was to create a branch that was powerful enough to govern and to check the power of the president, but not powerful enough to practice tyrannical rule. They created the House, so the population had an opinion, and the Senate, so the state had an opinion. They wanted Congress to embody republican principles, and even with their central policy-making that they would be responsive to the needs and will of the people. Question 2: Why are incumbents generally so successful in congressional elections?…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The 22nd amendment states that the president can only hold office up to eight years. George Washington is the one who establishes the policies of presidents not to serve more than two terms in office. I think this amendment important because the founders did not want a dictatorship. This amendment wouldn't allow that to happen they can only stay in office less than eight years. Every four years we vote for a new president or the existing president to stay in office for four more years.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Members of the House already have to be re-elected every two years and members of the Senate have to be elected six years. (“How Congress Works”, 67) Therefore, it is unfair that a constituents vote must be casted on a candidate who falls between the eligible amount of terms. If a candidate gets re-elected therefore it is what the constituents want. This argument against the implementation of term limits in congress is flawed in many ways.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obamacare Debacle: Another Reason We need a Second political party. Sometimes you simply hope that your predictions will be wrong and that events will miraculously turn out differently, unfortunately this is not one of those times. Most people with a modicum of common sense anticipated that the Republicans would now take the blame for the troubles of Obamacare, and that has come to pass. ……… ………….…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some proponents of term limits believe that political PACs would lose some of this power if term limits were imposed because it would disrupt the relationships between candidates and PACs by constantly rotating the politicians in power. However, the agencies that are sophisticated and eager to deploy their money in Washington and, as Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in the 2003 Supreme Court Case that upheld most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, “Money, like water, will always find an outlet” In the short run, term limits can destroy the long standing relationships between Congressmen and special interest groups, and every decade or two, a new set of Congressmen will be eager for donations. But super PACs and interest groups will continue to funnel money into politics. Most proposals for term limits advocate for the chance to run for election at least once, so politicians will continue to welcome financial support for these campaigns; term limits would force interest groups to work harder to gain their influence with each new class of…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Term Limits In Congress

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Only having office for a limited amount of time, the transient desires of congressmen become their main concern. Furthermore, this short-term mindset has the potential to negatively alter the effectiveness of congress. Thomas E. Mann, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in governance studies believes that if congress enforced term limits it would not just affect congress but America’s political system as a whole (Mann). In fact, this potential harm to the political system would show through in the current democratic electoral…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One limit is that you should be able to draw the line of the district without having to pick up your pencil. It’s a continuous line. The second limit is that the amount of people in a district should be equal. Political parties play important roles in US elections and government institutions. Over the past several decades, the influence of political parties in elections has declined while their strength in Congress has increased.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Beinhart, 2002) With more voters involved, Congressmen would be elected by the amount of service they offer to the citizens of America. Term limits would allow people to more accurately choose the Congressmen that would represent them the best by judging them based on their policies, not their past terms. The competitiveness of elections caused by term limits would get voters more involved in politics and help them to choose the best…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate on whether congressional representatives should or should not have term limits is still a big issue in the realm of the United States’ political system. This issue has been debated for many years, but is constantly overlooked by congressional representatives from across the country. Having congressional term limits would be extremely beneficial to the political system of the United States, and to the citizens of the United States. Some of the founding fathers were also in favor of creating term limits for representatives. The purpose of this paper is to prove that it would be beneficial for members of Congress to have term limits because it promotes new ideas, prevents corruption, and would have a positive impact on the legislation…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. Why are political parties in the United States weaker today than in the past? Political parties are becoming weaker due to some ways that the political party candidates and representatives, are going about handling their campaigns and pushing their agenda forward in America. In the past years, the regulations that were in place, in the past and are currently in place now, have greatly changed, in how political parties are regulated.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If life tenure is such a good idea, as it would eliminate the above mentioned problems, then why are so many in opposition of term limits and shuns the proposals? They value judicial independence, and they all have forms of accountability and term limits, so what are the reasons for their views and objections about cutting life tenure? Making term limits would not make the stakes any less important or productive.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress: A Broken Government Throughout history, scholars, politicians, and the general public have been divided into two separate categories: those who agree that Congress is not a broken government and those who disagree with the former and argue that Congress is a broken government. While many factors point toward either argument, the most prominent answer is that Congress is, indeed, broken. The design of Congress, the founder’s intentions for Congress, and the Washington Establishment are among some of the many reasons that reveal plainly the brokenness of the government and allow others to see the dysfunction of Congress as well. Congress is designed to be made up of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supporters of this amendment, however believe it prevents political stagnation. As times changed, allowing a new president to step in, the people felt they would see beneficial changes and a new perspective on political issues. To this day there are pros and cons to this controversial amendment. The pros of the amendment are a long term presidency would meet with the needs of the people.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays