The Limitations Of Genetic Enhancements For Children Essay

1856 Words Nov 22nd, 2016 8 Pages
This ethical study will define the limitations of genetic enhancements for children in the theories posited by Julian Savulescu (2007) and Michael Sandel (year?). Savulescu (2007) defines some of the overarching responsibility of parents to use whatever means necessary to improve the lives of their children, which is a moral and ethical obligation in the use of genetic enhancements. However, Sandel (year?) countermands this argument by claiming that parents will more likely use genetic enhancement to control the outcome of the child’s development, and more dangerously, crate a child that will out-compete other children. This form of ambition and hierarchical perspective is a damaging and conflict-based problem in genetic enhancement because Sandel (year?) correctly identifies the social/economic structure of a capitalist society that could greater genetic options for ambitious/wealthy parents to receive these medical treatments. Certainly, Sandel (year?) offers a more realistic argument about the motivations of parents to control birth outcomes for their benefit, which reduces Savulescu’s (2007) claims about the moral obligation of parents to improve the lives of their children. In essence, study will define the limitations of genetic enhancements for children in the theories posited by Julian Savulescu (2007) and Michael Sandel (year?).

I.
Julian Savulescu (2007) defines three arguments that support genetic enhancement as an ethical obligation of human beings to…

Related Documents