In short his argument is that the rational pleasures are better because they capture what humans really are and will satisfy us. The other spirited and appetitive pleasures will never satisfy us. We would always crave for more. The best life in this case is where we focus on rational pleasures. He suggest that these rational pleasures are what makes us human. I would suggest that it is not just satisfying the rational pleasures that make us human. Rather, it is a combination of all the pleasures. I believe that the appetitive money-loving and the honour-loving pleasures are completely human. Although the rational part of the soul may separate us from animals it can be the case that the other parts of the soul are as human as the
In short his argument is that the rational pleasures are better because they capture what humans really are and will satisfy us. The other spirited and appetitive pleasures will never satisfy us. We would always crave for more. The best life in this case is where we focus on rational pleasures. He suggest that these rational pleasures are what makes us human. I would suggest that it is not just satisfying the rational pleasures that make us human. Rather, it is a combination of all the pleasures. I believe that the appetitive money-loving and the honour-loving pleasures are completely human. Although the rational part of the soul may separate us from animals it can be the case that the other parts of the soul are as human as the