Timberlake Case Analysis

Hence, their immoral unilaterally assessed bad address fee against North Alabama Educators Credit Union Member Timberlake’s account is wrong; subsequently, they took their scandalous actions over Member Timberlake’s objections, without affording Member Timberlake entreated quotidian substantive due process of law, and refusing an impartial hearing.

Since, their questionable decision was to unilaterally assess a bad address fee against North Alabama Educators Credit Union member Timberlake’ account; subsequently, their scandalous actions were taken over Member Timberlake’s objections, and without affording Member Timberlake his entreated substantive due process of law.
Appellant Timberlake’s petition concerns unlawful racial discrimination, …show more content…
Administrator Moore, Appellant Timberlake vehemently disagrees with your Pecksniffian concurrence with the of NAECU officials’ finding, regarding Appellant Timberlake’s complaint, clearly, their hegemonic pseudo-due process investigation and their unilateral decision. Accordingly, NAECU officials erroneously levied and speciously extract funds from Member Timberlake’s account. Thus, their iniquity was committed allegedly for the fallacious reason, a bad address, is flagrantly wrong.

Administrator Moore, Appellant Timberlake vehemently disagrees with your Pecksniffian concurrence with the of NAECU officials’ finding, regarding their reply to Appellant Timberlake’s complaint; surely, the NAECU officials aforesaid actions tantamount to a brazen injustice. Their pseudo due process-investigation did not inhibit, their unilateral decision to levy erroneously and to extract speciously funds from Member Timberlake’s account, NAECU officials misfeasance used the fallacious reason, a bad address; consequently, NAECU officials acted hegemoniclly on Member Timberlake’s due process