Congress ensured that the President could set the terms and method of repayment for aid extended under the Lend-Lease Act and the Act allowed for repair and maintenance services of Lead-Lease material to be privately contracted. The former of these provisions acknowledged the fact that Britain was in no position to repay loans and perhaps would not be for the foreseeable future. While the latter opened up financial opportunities for American companies, appears to be an attempt to provide work for American companies still gripped by the ongoing depression. Along with these changes, the American government had also previously increased military spending and the instituted a peacetime draft. While these actions did not receive universal support in Congress, their passage made it clear a majority of lawmakers believed that the war could not be ignored indefinitely. Given the sentiments of a large number of their constituents, the Congress acted as best they could to position the nation to prepare for war and to ensure that the war was not lost before American …show more content…
Financial and material aid to nations like Israel and Pakistan to help them stabilize their respective regions began shortly after World War Two and continues to this day. While the Lend-Lease act did not have the exact same goal the parallel to the open intent of the Act, America’s defense, is uncanny. These policies have had mixed results in the modern era but they have sometimes allowed America’s materials rather than her troops to be involved in conflicts around the world. The Lend-Lease Act allowed the United States to buy limited time and, at least, begin minor preparation for the war. All of this was possible due to a President who swayed a majority of Congress to realize that entry into the war