The Lemon Test Analysis

Improved Essays
I think that the government should respect the individual religious beliefs of all American citizens, if their beliefs do not harm others. The government should have no place in creating laws that have anything to do with religion or become entangled in it. The Lemon Test determines if the government has violated the establishment clause, regarding the separation of church and state.

When one person’s belief system directly affects another, it is cause for disagreement with the government’s role in religion. A recent occurrence where a Christian business owner refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding became big news. Some said that the customer must have their way, and the refusal would be discriminatory, while others say that the owner was

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins went to Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood,CO, and requested that its owner, Jack C.Phillips, design and create a cake for their wedding. Phillips refused to design the cake because of religious beliefs, he doesn’t create wedding cakes for the same sex wedding. The issue is that since Phillips declined to create the cake, Craig and David Mullins filed charges of discrimination with the Colorado Civil Rights Division; they formed a formal complaint with the office of Administrative Courts. On August 13, 2015, the Colorado court of appeals unanimously affirmed the commission’s order, finding that the bakery discriminated and violated the state law. The Colorado Supreme Court denied review while the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26, 2017.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with the court’s ruling because in their ruling they were able to explain that under some circumstances the actions of religion are amendable and that there is some flexibility that allows freedom of action to exist. In general I agree that laws are made to be laws and that people should not be given expectation to surpass the law because of religion. With that said, I would not have agreed with the courts decision if they did not provided cases or situations in which the free expression clause did more than just protect the belief that religions have. Also, in this case the over whelming point of “laws are laws” out weight any freedom of exercise clause, and while the court could have over ruled the state legislation I agree with the reasoning behind not over ruling that…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell V. Hobby Lobby Stores Corporate exercise of religious freedom is continually a source of contention within the United States. Many argue that corporations are not entitled to the rights and liberties of citizens. Some, however, believe that these corporations act as an extension of the people running them. Either argument has significant implications on the national level.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lemon II Case Study

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages

    This case, often called Lemon II, occurred after the fist decision in 1971. After Lemon I, the court decided that the government could not give money to non- public schools for secular subjects. This case, through the creation of the Lemon test, determined that Act 109 violated the Establishment Clause. When this decision was made, the district court gave permission for Pennsylvania to reimburse the schools prior to 1971. Lemon challenged this act claiming that this violated the constitution and was clearly against reason and evidence.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lemon Vs Kurtzman

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the birth of our nation, we have been provided with amendments set in place to protect our freedoms. This set of amendments is known as the bill of rights, and they serve as a guideline for laws so we can determine if they are just or unjust. Since most of the constitution and bill of rights is up to interpretation, there end up being quite a few discrepancies over what the text of these documents actually mean. Because of this we have a Supreme Court that is there to play referee and make the decision over which side is right. In the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman, the plaintiff has claimed that the states of Pennsylvania and Rhode Island have been violating the first amendment’s establishment clause by giving public funds away to church-related…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion in the Workplace Religion is an important aspect of most societies because each country’s religious practice influence ethics, human dealings, social customs, and the ways in which members of a society relate to each other and to outsiders, as well as workplace behavior. Religion is becoming an increasingly polarizing issue in the workplace, forcing managers to balance the respective interests of employees, coworkers, and patrons of establishments. The annual debate about whether an evergreen is an appropriate public symbol in December or whether the office party should have a Christmas theme happens each year. Questions such as: Why should one bring his or her religion to the workplace? Why shouldn’t they?…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government may not demonstrate a preference for one particular sect or creed. Allegheny Cnty. v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989). A court’s finding of improper purpose behind a statute is appropriately determined by the statute on its face, its legislative history, or interpretation by a responsible administrative agency. Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987).…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Various components of this included paying for a portion of the teachers salaries, materials, textbooks, and several others. In Pennsylvania, many citizens argued that this violated the separation of the church and state. Citizens in Rhode Island called this act unconstitutional as it violated the Establishment Clause. The court in a decision of 8 - 1 decided that it was unconstitutional. A three-pronged test called The Lemon Test was created in order to avoid violating the Establishment Clause (Lemon v. Kurtzman -…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On a sunny July day in 2012, Jack Phillips began his work day like normal. Little did he know, that by the end of that day, his business was on its way to ruins due to his religious beliefs. As a man of faith, Phillips believes that things such as same-sex marriage, anti-American beliefs, sexual themes, the disparagement of people go against his religion- therefore, he refuses to create art for any event expressing these ideologies. Based on this, we are affirming that the Supreme Court should rule with Jack Phillips. In a statement in a news conference after a session in the US Supreme Court, Phillips stated “One of my favorite parts of my job has always been designing and creating wedding cakes.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the Founding Fathers tried to protect religion from interference of the government, today’s government has tried to completely remove religion from daily life. The cases Van Orden v. Perry and McCreary County v. ACLU both represent a time when the First Amendment was put into question, each with a different result. With more religious freedoms being questioned, the intention of our Founding Fathers with regard to religious freedom and the government’s involvement are frequently questioned. After seeing the results of both cases, the Founding Father’s intention and the intentions of today’s government show conflicting ideologies.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An individual could argue that it takes away from the first amendment. The first amendment states that a citizen is guaranteed the freedom of religion and that the government cannot restrict an individual’s religious practices (First Amendment). With that in mind, it is possible that an individual could say the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could be taking away from that part of the first amendment. Another argument that an individual could argue is that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act it could discriminate against the LGBT community. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act in Indiana caused a lot of controversy with the LGBT community because the bill allows business owners to deny giving service to the LGBT community at any given…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Religion could be found in every corner of the world. It dictates what we eat, how we look, what we do or don’t do, and the morals we believe. For a lot of us religion is a big part of our lives and this could be seen in our government. Since the birth of the United States, religion has played a big part in our society, lawmaking, and culture. The U.S is a Christian based country and its morals have dictated a lot of laws.…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boy Scouts Pros And Cons

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have mixed emotions on the Boy Scouts of America ruling of rather it was exercising its rights given to it by the First Amendment or rather it should not be allowed to exclude people based on the public accommodation exclusion in the first amendment. Considering the U.S. Supreme Court made up of lawyers could not agree, 5 to 4 decision, I am sure that it is beyond my ability to determine legally where BSA falls into this definition. My biggest objection to the BSA ruling is that it did not specifically have rules that applied to homosexuality; it was very vague and told its leaders not to discuss these issues. It is also a huge organization even though it is private and does not receive any government funds, it can based on its size, have an influence on people with the decisions it makes, and the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discrimination Against Christianity Christians are labeled as uneducated, judged for their beliefs, and discriminated against in the mainstream culture. It is absurd that people have a problem with the right to Freedom of religion, considering that our founding fathers found it so important that it they set in place as an amendment. It is hard to understand why people think that it is ok to discriminate against Christians. The Bible states that we will be persecuted for our beliefs. For example, in Second Timothy 3:12 it says “ Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ jesus shall suffer persecution (Bible KJV).”…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays