Same Sex Marriage Case Summary

Improved Essays
The purpose of a business is to provide goods/services to consumers in order to make a profit. The article discusses the legal struggle of Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, a Lakewood, Colorado bakery, his stance on same-sex marriage and the effects on his business.
Mr. Phillips was requested by Charlie Craig and David Mullins (a same-sex couple) to bake a wedding cake for them. According to Mr. Phillips, who is a born-again Christian, he cannot and will not design desserts for same-sex weddings. Mr. Phillips cites his Christian beliefs in that it would be a violation and rebellion again God to do so. His beliefs are that the Bible’s definition of marriage is clear and that it does not include marriage of same-sex couples.
Craig
…show more content…
Phillips to continue to deny services to same-sex couples based on his religious beliefs could open the door for other businesses to use other biases as a screen to hide behind. Every day there are cases of discrimination, most that are never reported. In this particular case, the voices of Charlie Craig and David Mullins have been heard and they have been vindicated, like it or not. Mr. Phillips has indicated that he will continue to take his case all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. Mr. Phillips can continue to deprive his customers of his wedding cake creations and his business of the revenue stream that would keep his business viable, or he can welcome new same-sex clientele and be a part of their happy and special celebrations. This choice truly is his, and he should keep in mind that in the Bible, the word of God, is that we should love one another, as God loves us (John 13:34). There isn’t a clause that says, unless you’re homosexual and then all bets are off.
As a side note, the website for Masterpice Cakeshop does invite customers to view the cake gallery and “We look forward to serving you!” again there is no disclaimer that states they will not create wedding cakes for same-sex couples (MasterpieceCakes, 2015). However, there is an area that allows those who wish, to donate to help cover legal costs, specific to this

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins went to Masterpiece Cakeshop in Lakewood,CO, and requested that its owner, Jack C.Phillips, design and create a cake for their wedding. Phillips refused to design the cake because of religious beliefs, he doesn’t create wedding cakes for the same sex wedding. The issue is that since Phillips declined to create the cake, Craig and David Mullins filed charges of discrimination with the Colorado Civil Rights Division; they formed a formal complaint with the office of Administrative Courts. On August 13, 2015, the Colorado court of appeals unanimously affirmed the commission’s order, finding that the bakery discriminated and violated the state law. The Colorado Supreme Court denied review while the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26, 2017.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlie Craig and David Mullins are a homosexual couple from Lakewood, Colorado that were in search of a cake for their weeding day much to their surprise when they entered Masterpiece Cakeshop the owner refused to sell them a wedding cake as it violated his personal religious beliefs. A Supreme Court Case was open in ruling that the owner Jack Phillips was discriminating the couple for their sexual preferences. In the first audio the court case of Jack Philips claims that he did not believe he was acting against the law because there has been various occasions in the past were the owners of cakeshops have denied their services to same-sex couples with the claim that they have the right to express their beliefs under the jurisdiction of the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    LGBT Civil Rights

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The is ridiculous in the fact that they only reason they won't let them get married is that they are gay nothing else. Also certain businesses have discriminated against gay people like they did back in the 50s' and 60s' to black people during the Civil Rights movement. Certain businesses like back then won't allow them entrance or not service them. Also when they would like to get married certain venues won't let them use their services because, they don't agree with it and see it as a bad move for business. They think that because, if they have a gay wedding they will lose heterosexual marriage business.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, in the case Ingersoll v. Arlenese Flowers, a business owner named Barronelle Stuzman, refused to give her service of floral arrangements for the gay couples wedding because it goes against her beliefs. The couple had been customers of Stutzman's shop for nine years, but when they asked her to provide flowers for their wedding, the florist declined, citing her "relationship with Jesus Christ (Kaplan 2015). The court ruled that Stuzman, was violating discrimination laws put into place in. Stuzman appealed to the Supreme Court where they affirmed the lower court’s ruling. However, Stuzman is not giving up, as she is asking the Supreme Court to reverse the decision.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On June 26, 2015 the United States Justices decided on a pivotal case in American history. In a close 5-4 vote the Justices deemed that same-sex marriage was constitutional via the 14th amendment. The Obergefell et al. v. Hodges case was the finality of a slow evolving progression for same-sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges). This landmark decision allowed same-sex marriage to be legal in the United States.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-Sex Marriage in New York "Who would give a law to lovers? Love is unto itself a higher law" ("Boethius"), a quote stated by a Roman philosopher Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius in 524 (Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius - Biography). Obviously, laws have nothing to do to interfere the love in theory; however, as the discrimination that homosexual people receive for a long period, people in New York has to fight for their equal right to have the law and live under the protection of it. Just like Boethius states, it is ironic that love have to be approved. No body could judge love; ridiculously, almost everybody gives discrimination to unusual love.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First argument: Video. “Republican chokes up at Gay Marriage Debate in Washington.” Posted by Chris Cunningham on February 9, 2102. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRmw1Su21iw In the video “Republican chokes up at Gay Marriage Debate in Washington”, Republican State Representative Maureen Walsh, representing the 16th district of Walla Walla, speaks in support of legalizing same-sex marriages in front of her colleagues during a debate in Washington DC.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On a sunny July day in 2012, Jack Phillips began his work day like normal. Little did he know, that by the end of that day, his business was on its way to ruins due to his religious beliefs. As a man of faith, Phillips believes that things such as same-sex marriage, anti-American beliefs, sexual themes, the disparagement of people go against his religion- therefore, he refuses to create art for any event expressing these ideologies. Based on this, we are affirming that the Supreme Court should rule with Jack Phillips. In a statement in a news conference after a session in the US Supreme Court, Phillips stated “One of my favorite parts of my job has always been designing and creating wedding cakes.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rod Dreher begins his argument opposing the view stating that the Christian solidarity means nothing unless they change their views. He goes on to state that Christians should not condemn violence as it is against the Bible. He also states that an advance of L.G.B.T. rights would be a utter loss of religious expression. He finishes with calling the absurdity of the Orlando attack being pinned on Christians as it was not the intention. Julie Rogers makes the strong claim that Christians must bridge the gap between saying that everyone is welcome, and actually making them welcome.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The First Amendment of the Constitution includes the Free Exercise Clause, which prohibits government interference with a person’s religious practice. The clause applies only to the action against the government, not to private employers (Miller, 2014, p.21-22). The creators of the Constitution understood that religious freedom was a significant subject that required its incorporation into the Bill of Rights. Religion can be a controversial subject due to the copious philosophies, and the passion people cherish. One passion arose with the introduction of House Bill 1632, in the Indiana General Assembly.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, Marriage Equality is a very hot topic. Same sex marriage is now legal throughout America. Many people are not happy about it, but some people are. This topic will always be very questionable topic in America. A lot of people do not believe that gays should not be allowed to be married, but for now they are.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commision was heard by the US Supreme Court December 5, 2017 and will be decided in 2018. The owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jack Phillips, is a christian man that designs cakes in the store. David Mullins and Charlie Craig are a same sex couple that went to Masterpiece Cakeshop with the intent of buying a wedding cake. David and Charlie asked to order a cake for their wedding, but Phillips told them that he would not make the wedding cake because it denied his religious beliefs. Phillips still offered to serve them, but he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first essay was “What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?” by Katha Pollitt. Katha Pollitt was for Gay marriage. Pollitt thinks her idea is write because she uses logical things. For instance she says that there still is “ forced marriages, child marriages, marriages predicated on the subjugation of women- gay marriage is like a fairy-tale romance compared with most chapters of the history of wedlock,(Pollitt 460). Pollitt basically says how it is ridiculous how we let these types of marriages…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008 Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays