Andrew Jackson's Presidency

Improved Essays
Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, born March 15th 1578 and died June 8th 1945, is known as one of the most influential presidents in United States history. His presidency is also one of the most controversial. While Jackson was known as a “people’s president” and a true advocate of the American freedom and integrity, he was also a man who neglected the minority and abused his power throughout his entire presidency to do so. He mistreated and killed Indians of many different nations, including those who stood by his side in his time of need, just to fulfill his vision of manifest destiny. Though loathed by the Indian nations, Jackson received much praise for his victories as a military leader, and later, a war hero. He …show more content…
So many lives had been taken, most of those being women and children, many people put their heads down to mourn. But not Andrew Jackson. Though wounded and weak from a recent dual, this lit a fire in Jackson’s eyes for this was the “opportunity he had been waiting for all his life.” (Morgan, Robert. Lions of the West, a Shannon Ravenel Book. 2012, pp. 106) He saw this as a chance to not only take vengeance on the British who had caused such strife and anguish in his young adult life, but also a chance to expand the lands in the west while simultaneously riding the lands of the pesky Indians who had constantly given him so much grief. He would finally be able to pursue the vision of a continental U.S populated by all whites. The attack of the Red Stick Indians resulting in the Fort Mims Massacre started a series of events that would end up being devastating to the Indian nations all throughout the western counties. The attack gave Jackson both the will power and support to gain a position of authority, much of which he craved. He used this new position of power to his advantage. Jackson gathered men by the hundreds, some American, some Cherokee Indians and they marched toward the creeks, a battle ending in victory. The defeated Red Sticks were forced to give up their lands and was immediately opened to settlement, just as Jackson wanted. This position of power and authority suited Jackson and he continued to use it …show more content…
Jackson himself was actually quite fond of the Indians, so much in fact, that he and his wife Rachel adopted two Indian boys and raised them as their own. But while he liked the Indians on a personal level and loved his sons, he still viewed them as an obstacle that was preventing him from gaining territory in the west. Land of which he so desired. Jackson’s relationships grew even more complicated as his hunger for expansion grew. He had many Indian allies, and also Indian enemies. He used many Cherokees and some friendly creeks in the “Battle of Horseshoe Bend.” The battle was victorious and although many white and Indian lives were lost, the Red Stick Indians had been defeated and territory in the creek country had been gained. But while the Cherokee Indians stood by Jackson’s side against the enemy Red Stick Indians, this peaceful friendship would soon come to a screeching halt for Jackson believed the Indians must completely submit to the United States. He told the Indians that “both friendly and formerly hostile, they must pay for the expenses incurred by the United States in fighting the war with the Red Sticks.” (Morgan, Robert. Lions of the West, a Shannon Ravenel Book. 2012, pp. 152).The Indians were hurt and astonished. Instead of being rewarded for their bravery and loyalty, they were to be stripped of almost all their lands, and by the hands of whom they had fought next to in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout this book Inskeep shows how far both men would go to accomplish their goals and leave their legacy. “Jacksonland “showed the two sides of power and the outcome of the territorial struggle. “Each man rose to supreme leadership of his nation, and struggled for control of million…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson Pros And Cons

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Native Americans. When it comes to Native American history, Jackson ranks right up there with the worst genocidal tyrants. Because white Southerners in the early 19th century craved the land inhabited by native tribes like the Choctaw, Chickasaw, Seminole, Creek and Cherokee, they needed the government to expel the original inhabitants so they could seize the property for themselves. Although the law only permitted voluntary and peaceful removals of natives from their land, Jackson ignored the law…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curtis explains that initially Jackson had no quarrel with the Native Americans because they never had harmed anyone in his family, but tensions between them and other westerners influenced his views (22). As Jackson grew older his words on Native Americans grew harsher and showed how he hated them for their disorder. Later when Jackson was a military man, he took to slaughtering so many Native Americans. He did this to the Creeks who had sided with the British and attacked Fort Mims in 1813 (Curtis 49). Yet during his presidency, when tensions with the United States and the Native Americans were high, Jackson said that “Indians are subjects of the United Stated” (Curtis 71).…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, Andrew jackson was not always considered a good guy. History.com says “When a man named charles richison called jackson a worthless coward, jackson challenged his accuser to a duel.” On reference.com it says “The major negative thing Andrew Jackson is remembered for is the forced relocation of many Native Americans.” This is important because this tells you that some people were not entirely impressed with what he did.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Andrew Jackson’s Speech (post-colonial & historical) The main Points of historical and post-colonial are mainly in the story “Andrew Jackson’s Speech”. The story sums up the how andrew jackson took the land from the indians and forced them to walk to live somewhere else and many died. For the historical point of view, On december 6th, 1830, Andrew Jackson called for the relocation of eastern native americans.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Georgians invaded their land for the gold within it the Cherokees decided to go to court. During the trial the judge decided that the Cherokees land was for the Cherokees and separate from the United States, but the Cherokees were still invaded in the end. Jackson decided to ignore the invaders not enforcing the verdict saying the judge should be enforcing it. He also ordered the Cherokees removal leading to the violent march, The Trail of Tears, which resulted in the deaths of around 4,000 Cherokees. This travesty is another reason why Jackson is a villain not a…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Known affectionately as “Old Hickory” by the men he had once led and fought with, and loved by most Americans, Andrew Jackson was revered at the time of his presidency. Jackson, born in 1767 to only his mother, grew up impoverished and rebellious. At the age of 13 Jackson joined the Revolutionary War and was subsequently captured by the British military. He survived, and sixteen years later he had become a lawyer, had acquired a wife, and became Tennessee 's first representative and senator. However Jackson would always have a love for the battlefield, and it’s in those moments he gained the admiration of the American Republic.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unlike any other presidents the United States had seen before, Jackson was not a politician and he was not well educated unlike his predecessors and running opponents. Although controversial, Jackon’ s Indian Removal Act of 1830, relocated thousands of Indians from their lands that they had lived on for hundreds of generations. This did however, allow the US to gain a substantial amount of land. As a military leader, Jackson successfully led his Tennessee troops against the Red Sticks People in the Creek War. He also ended the creek war with the victory at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the greatest developments of the 19th century was the Industrial Revolution, as it paved the way for a new way of living in America. New forms of technology and transportation contributed to the increased expansion from the established eastern cities to the western frontier. Although this expansion created many new possibilities, there was still people who felt expansion was detrimental to the nation. Between 1800 and 1855, supporters and opponents of territorial expansion influenced federal government policy by urging the government to act, or not to, on expansion debate that would affect the future of the nation. During the 1800’s, America was ready to expand but the French held control of New Orleans and the Louisiana territory,…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was said that President Andrew Jackson was looking in the best interest of U.S. citizens and moved the indians to help keep from conflicts that could possibly lead to war from arising yet again between the United States and the Native Americans or that some Native tribes were just too violent and were seen as a threat by U.S. citizens. It seemed like Americans and Native Americans could not blend and live together peacefully and that is also a said reason why the Trail of Tears…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But this was ignored and whites continued to move into Indian Territory. It is reported that U.S president Andrew Jackson responded by saying “Well John Marshall his decision. Now let him enforce it!” Andrew Jackson did nothing to help the Indians or make things better for them. He believed the best thing for them was to move them…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays