Lifestyle Statute

Improved Essays
Lifestyle statutes are laws that protect an employee 's lawful off-duty conduct. California, Colorado, New York, and North Dakota have lifestyle statutes that protect employees for any lawful activity off-duty. In addition, Connecticut protects employees ' off-duty speech. These statutes vary in their protection and the courts have interpreted these broad off-duty protection statutes differently with little precedent with respect to Facebook. In fact, the Supreme Court indicated that courts should be reluctant to establish privacy principles in this area. The protection offered by the lifestyle statutes is in broad language, however, in effect through case holdings, it is actually tremendously limited. There are several reasons …show more content…
“The Free Speech Act was enacted to ‘remedy the disparity’ between public sector employees ' First Amendment free speech protection and private sector employees who are not given First Amendment protection.” One of the limitations is that it does not protect prospective employees, rather it protects existing employees from discipline “’on account of the exercise by such employee of rights guaranteed by the [F]irst [A]mendment to the United States Constitution’ so long as the ‘activity does not substantially or materially interfere with the employee 's bona fide job performance or the working relationship between the employee and the employer.’” This is easily thwarted by employers as they could argue the “employee 's speech rose to the level of required interference as to negate the employee 's protection from the Act.” Lastly, the limitation of this statute is that it only protects speech and does not offer protection for any other off duty conduct including information posted on a job candidates Facebook …show more content…
California Labor Code section 96(k) protects lawful conduct occurring during nonworking hours away from the employer’s premises. This law appears to be broad, however, it is restrictive. In Barbee v. Household Automotive, the Court held that 96(k) did not create a substantive right; instead, it was a procedure for the Labor Commissioner to uphold already recognized constitutional rights. This essentially means the California lifestyle statute only protects previously “recognized constitutional rights.” Thus, based on state common law, this statute is inadequate in protecting applicants from employers screening of their Facebook accounts since it will not protect an employee 's online behavior and conduct outside of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This law states that the more time we spend online using social media the easier it is for companies to track us and learn how to accurately enhance our online experience (285). Overall this law seems relatively accurate. If we want to have the best possible experience online than companies need to understand our likes and dislikes, and have the ability to respond accordingly. Another subject of debate is Facebook. Many people argue that Facebook continues to break privacy laws and as a result damages lives.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, the Fourth Amendment was a factor the Supreme Court had to thoroughly take into consideration. “Riley V. California” states the final ruling, as a unanimous decision that entailed…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    in an article called, “Quit Social Media. Your Career May Depend on It,” written by Cal Newport expresses why people need to quit their social media accounts, or at least use it to help them in the long run. Newport (2016) expresses that social media provides little to no work skills, waist valuable time, and unprofessional. He also uses rhetorical devices such as syllogism, ethos, pathos, and logos to provide credibility to his side of the argument. Newport (2016) starts off by pointing out that social media itself doesn’t hurt us, it’s the operator themselves.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every public and private employment is subject to the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), which prohibits against sexual harassment in the workplace. Each organization’s workers, including upper managements, managers, supervisors, and non-supervisory employees are subject to the FEHA’s anti-harassment provisions. All employees are expected to behave professionally and respectfully while interacting with others without regard to classification, job title, or function. Discriminatory or harassing conduct in any organization should not be tolerated.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When public employee makes a statement pursuant to their official duties, they are not speaking as citizens. First Amendment protects citizens who are speaking as a concerned citizens, (Pickering, supra, at 568, 88 S.Ct. 1731). 2. When a citizen enters government service, the citizen must accept certain limitations on his or her freedom.(Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661, 671, 114 S.Ct. 1878, 128 L.Ed.2d 686 (1994)). (plurality opinion)((“[T]he government as employer indeed has far broader powers than does the government as sovereign”)).…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many instances where employees have lost their jobs due to certain posts made about others on Facebook and Twitter. Although it is unprofessional to speak harshly about colleagues or the workplace on social media, these websites, just like the United States, are places where users can freely speak their minds. It is unfair to the citizens of the United States that they might be punished…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public or private? Most individuals are asked this question before posting a status update or photo on social media networks. The small question may seem monotonous or insignificant, but with 52% of employers using social media in employment screening processes, individuals should consider being more careful about what they choose to post (Reinsch, et. al. 154). This controversial topic has been in place with the conjunction of current social media networks and Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that acknowledges discrimination of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social media in the workplace has been controversial for a while. There are different sides, the good and the bad. The cons involve problems with the law and bans. Like the case of a man working at a health care place and getting fired after posting a threat. He said that he was only venting about the patient (Horowitz, 2014).…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, it was similar to the general language of other “specific rights” such as “freedom of speech,” which judges had interpreted and applied for years. Harlan believed that judges would be equally capable of interpreting “liberty.” Although there were two other concurrences, all agreed that the “right to privacy” was “fundamental” and “substantive.” Justice Arthur Goldberg concurred, arguing that the Ninth Amendment, which states that the Bill of Rights does not exhaust all the rights contained by the people, contained a “fundamental right to marital privacy” that was not found in any other specific constitutional amendment.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis 1. Weeks of notice of termination or pay in lieu of notice. According to the Employment Standard Act (ESA) 2000, Ethan should be given four weeks of notice since he has been working for the company for more than four years but less than five years.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In public personnel administration, the First Amendment relates to freedom of speech and association usually (Kellough, 2018, p. 3). The U.S. Supreme Court has the final decision in cases that arise for public employees. The Supreme Court ruled in Rankin v. McPherson that if speech on a public concern by a public employee is not disruptive, then it is protected (Kellough, 2018, p. 4). In other words, public employees have the freedom of speech and cannot be fired for using their right. Furthermore, employees cannot be forced to join political parties unless it is essential for their job, it would be a violation of their rights (Kellough, 2018, p. 4).…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Private employers also have an absolute right to regulate or prohibit any category of “unprotected” speech such as obscenity or “fighting words.” Further, all employers must take action against employees that create a hostile work environment including engaging in speech that would constitute harassment. What private employers cannot prohibit is speaking on behalf of yourself and coworkers in order to improve work conditions or for objecting to an illegal condition of activity. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) restricts an employer 's right to limit workers ' communications about wages, hours and the terms or conditions of employment during non-work time in non-work areas. It is significant that many of the NLRA 's provisions are applicable to non-union employers and protect workers who do not belong to any labor union.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Ethical Issues Of Social Media

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    The first of these is the Social Networking Online Protection Act. The proposed bill would make it illegal for employers to ask applicants for private social networking credentials and passwords. While several state legislations have already passed similar regulations, this represents the first congressional attempt at passing such laws. (Stern n.p.)…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For me, a good Reputation is worth fighting for by any means necessary. No matter how hard or long you try, your reputation will stay with you for the rest of your life. It shows people who you really are, whether you wanted anyone to know about it or not. You should keep your reputation very close to your heart and guarded. Everyone deserves to have people talk about them they way they want to be talked about and be remembered for the good and not the bad.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Hiring Process

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The recent growth of Information Technology and Systems in the modern world has completely changed the job hiring process. In particular, social media has been a huge influence in the transformation. The job hiring process used to be fairy simple, a good resume and face-to-face interview and you had the job. Today, recruiters are not only using traditional hiring methods but also using social media as a personal background check. There are numerous positive and negative aspects of this controversial practice.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays