The Three Laws Of Nature, By Thomas Hobbes

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes lived during a time of great upheaval and strife in his country. Much of this influenced his political and social thesis. Hobbes believed man was selfish and self-serving, and that its natural state was war. People will fight each other for three reasons: in defense of themselves, family, and livestock, to make themselves masters of others and their belongings, and in response to the status or slight of themselves, their family, clan, or nation. This state of nature would produce a world in which there was no security. Thus there are three laws of nature, or lex naturalis, which guide man to justice. The first general rule which holds the idea that man will not continue to act in a way that is destructive of life, and that he …show more content…
There still needs to be a way to have trust that the other will not break the covenant they have made. This is where the Commonwealth comes in, a common power to induce men to honor their contracts and to provide security and safety. Sovereign power is given to one individual, or to an assembly of men, that effectively reduces the multitude of wills and voices to one. Every man is making a covenant to allow this individual or assembly to govern for them. Hobbes believed that once given this power was inviolable, it should not be removed, or a new covenant made with a new individual or assembly when the populace is disgruntled. The result would be civil war and that the horrors and miseries that accompanied that were far worse than the miseries of the current rule. I found Hobbes to be the most interesting of the three political views, though I did find it distasteful that those in misery were expected to remain content with their lot and not seek betterment at the cost of questioning or discontinuing the sovereignty of the ruler/rulers. However, that may be due to being raised in a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4) What does Meng tzu mean by “a heart sensitive to the suffering of others?” Why does he claim that this defines our humanity, and why does it need to be developed if we are to be ethical or truly humane? What are the other three “seeds” which make up the “sensitive heart,” and how do they become developed? Why is the development of each a necessary part of humaneness?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke points out the freedom of the ruled over the rights of the sovereign. Locke favors a legislature government over a monarch. He puts up in mind an administration with the fear of concentrated power. For Locke, the most horrible form of the regime is tyranny, consequently, as much as possible; he puts the power to the hands of the people, where Hobbes prefers the sovereign. The government of Locke obtains its rule directly from the citizens, whereas Hobbes’s monarch rules absolutely.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (208) One doesn’t need to go into painstaking detail to prove that totalitarian rule has led to immeasurable human suffering, with Hitler’s Germany, Maoist China, and Stalinist Russia immediately comes to mind. Locke correctly is skeptical of absolute power, likening it to slavery and a state of war. (248) Although there is certainly merit to the very basics of Hobbes’ argument, the basics of Locke’s argument are quite…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government. Hobbes ideas impact our daily lives mainly his belief that states that the people should give up some of their rights to a more absolute power to protect them and regulate the society around them. This idea is known as a social compact or contract that states that, in their natural state, Hobbes believed that people would fight only for their self-interest and attack those who were in pursuit of their interests. The only way to stop people from engaging in this natural act was to create a government that would enforce the law and protect people from their state of nature. Hobbes negative view towards the nature of humans parallels that of the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose of law: Hobbes, white and Mill. Hobbes: Hobbes: The purpose of law, according to Hobbes is to bring stability and safety. Thomas Hobbes writes in the Leviathan a similar passage written by another Thomas in the Declaration of Independence, “All men are created equal.” This is where the parallel between the two ends. Jefferson perfected Hobbes’ thought, and set forth to help create the foundation for the nation we now know as the United States of America.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Generally, rights are defined as claims or entitlements, and they take positive and negative forms. A negative right is a freedom from interference with regard to some activity or pursuit. Examples of negative rights include the right of freedom of speech and the right to worship. Meanwhile, a positive right is a claim to some good or service, such as rights to education or health care.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He for the most part disagrees with everything John Locke said. Locke says the state of nature for the most part is peaceful. Hobbes says the state of nature is actually a state of war. The only thing the two agree on is the need for a form government. For Hobbes In the state of nature there is no such thing as justice or injustice for that matter.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Hobbes is a well renowned philosopher, specifically in the world of political philosophy. His work the Leviathan opened up revolutionary ideas that were beyond his time. Hobbes wrote the “Leviathan” during the English Civil War, a war caused by religion and violently ending with the beheading of the king. Hobbes watched this madness unfold, leading him to extend a “helping hand” over to England authority, by publicizing a solution for all to read. His work introduced a radical topic by the name of “Social Contract,” which proposed that a person’s morals and/or political obligations are dependent on an agreement to form or coexist in a society.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Good Law Vs Positive Law

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What is the law and why it is important for us? Law is a body of rules and regulations that are created by the jurisdiction to govern the social community. In the past, laws are often made by some powerful authoritarian people to rule their country and people. In today, such as Canada, laws are administrated by government officers, and it maintain a fair and peaceful environment for everyone. The main purpose of the law is to reduce the criminal rates and provide welfare for the citizens.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays