Essay On The Law Of Liberty

Great Essays
THE LAW OF LIBERTY

Introduction

The Law of Liberty is initially mentioned in James 1:25, “But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continue therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.” At this point, James is referring to the Gospel, even though it is termed a law, it is not, firmly speaking; a law is authorized and obligated. But, here it is an affirmation of uprightness and deliverance by Jesus Christ, a proposal of tranquility and forgiveness by Him and a free promise of eternal life (Platt, 17).
The expression Law of Liberty is stated secondly in James 2:12. In this section of the letter, James is speaking of the sin of showing bias in the church. He reminds his hears that to demonstrate favoritism toward others is a defiance of the
…show more content…
Conclusion When James speaks of the “Law of Liberty,” he is speaking of the whole law of God as interpreted by Jesus Christ. Because the ceremonial law has been fulfilled by Christ, we are no longer bound to keep its ceremonies and rituals. Nevertheless, the Law’s summation and real meaning which is “love God with all your heart and love your neighbors as yourself, still binds us today. We will be judged according to our conformity to the Law. Those who are in Christ will be accepted into God’s presence because of His perfect conformity to the Law. God’s righteousness is ours by faith alone, and the genuineness of our faith is demonstrated in that we are persistent to live in a way that will be accepted by the “Law of Liberty” (James 2:12). This “Law of Liberty” is the “Royal Law” as found in James 2:9. In order for me to conform to the Law of God in my life, there must be conformity to the will of God in my heart (Brown

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Apush 2002 Dbq Analysis

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - The colonists may have obtained their independence and freedom. However, they were still, "...loyal subjects of our dread sovereign lord, King James..." (Document 3A2) The colonists may be fearful and apprehensive about their king, but they have not forgotten where their loyalty lies regardless. -…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Speech to the General Court” the discussion of natural and civil liberty is presented. Withdrop explains what both mean and which one he favors and thinks should be in place. He explains natural liberty as, “incompatible and inconsistent with authority.” Meaning that it is perceived as men make their own laws a which tend to lean towards wants and self-interest rather than the true good. Withdrop states that if man chooses this liberty they will become the equivalent to a beast.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebellion Dbq

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The British King and Parliament were depriving colonists of their natural rights, therefore justifying the colonists’ actions of rebellion and independence. There are many ways to look at this statement, two of which are the following: everyone was born with God given natural rights or everyone had king granted rights. The first side of the statement is this: everyone was born with God given rights to life, liberty, and property. This idea came from John Locke in the 17th century.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his famous "Little Speech" John Winthrop talks about the two different types of liberties, a liberty to do what whatever you want (Natural Liberty) and the liberty that comes from accepting the authority of society (Moral Liberty). He believes that natural liberty is much more dangerous then moral liberty because it will grow "men into more evil, and in time to be worse than brute beasts"(Foner 31) and not be beneficial to society. On the other hand having moral liberty is much more stable and "this liberty is the proper and object of authority , and cannot subsist without it, and it is a liberty to that only which is good, just, and honest"(Foner, 31). I agree with John Winthrop because if there are so rules or laws then people will go…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Virginia Statue for Religious Freedom Written by one of the United States of America’s founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson, the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom is a declaration of the right to religious freedom and separation of church and state. Jefferson first drafted the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom in 1777 but the bill was not passed into law until January of 1786, seven years after being initially introduced to the Virginia General Assembly. Backed by dissenting sects, such as the Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc., Jefferson gave voice to the grievances of those paying taxes to fund the Church of England, to the many religions that demanded legal protection to practice their desired religion, and to the people petitioning for the separation of church and state.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the bill of rights, James Madison uses diction, syntax, and repetition to signify the libertization of every citizen in America by granting each individual, specific rights of their own. I. historical background The bill of rights was created approximately five years after the American revolution, which was the one and only revolution that granted the united states their freedom from Great Britain, in fact, it was such a long and concurring war, most were distraught with the length of the revolution and began to question its end, but after 18 very long years, we successfully gained our freedom from the evil all powerful currency-stealing superpower we so call Great Britain. Since the war was now over, the colonies started to think about…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upon reading the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution and Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptist, many commonalities can be seen in the wording of the documents and the spirit in which they were written. In all three documents the Framers of the Constitution’s belief in a Biblical worldview is apparent. A Biblical worldview holds that God is the answer to the questions of: what is the origin, nature, and destiny of the cosmos and what is the origin nature, role, and destiny of man (Martin, 2006). While this commonality exists between all three documents, they also differ in many aspects such as, tone, intended audience and purpose. To be able to understand the commonalities and differences between the three documents a summary needs to be given of the three documents.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Magna Carta Clauses

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Given these points the Magna Carta and the clauses included in it were the foundation of the U.S government. Even though the Magna Carta was valid for a short period of time, its symbolism is still very important. Rights nowadays are exactly the same as they used to be, but they stemmed from the idea of the Magna There are two very important clauses in the Magna Carter that I believe the liberty provides for the development of the protection of rights in the U.S. Clause 39 Clause 40 Clause 39 ““To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or justice.” In other words; There will be balanced admissions to the courts to every citizen without fees This clause it still a valid law in England…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. Roger Williams had never disclaimed and abhorred that an infinite liberty of conscience was a mistake, but he placed limits on liberty that were based on justice, peace and sobriety. Roger Williams said “I further add, that I never denied, that notwithstanding this liberty, the commander of this ship’s course, yea, and also commander that justice, peace, and sobriety be kept and practiced, both among the seamen and all the passengers”(206) supported that people should have the right to freedom. For example, if Papists and Protestants, Jews and Muslims took preaches in the Town of Providence, and that we're not affect the justice, peace and sobriety of a country, those preachers should not be forced to come to the ship’s prayers or worship…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A covenant is an agreement between two or more people to do or refrain from some sort of action. Government is an exercise of authority and restraint toward a group of people and their actions for purpose of justice which is the punishment of people who violate liberty of others. Liberty is freedom of restraint from use of people’s unalienable rights which are according to the U.S. Constitution are laid out in the Bill of Rights. Early Americans covenanted together to create our government, a government supposedly for the people by the people. This was done to protect people from oppression and violation of their unalienable rights.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is the statement also found in the Declaration of Independence itself and is, in my opinion, the thing that makes America the best nation in the world and a nation that other countries model themselves after. Every human being has the right to life – no one should ever have the right to take another person’s life. God is the only one with that right. Liberty is another word for freedom. No one human being should ever have the right to control the future of another human being or make decisions for another human being.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson can be seen as many men: a revolutionary whose signature is proudly displayed on the Declaration of Independence, a slave owner who disagreed with slavery, or the enemy of religion. In his life he fought for people’s individual rights and happiness, his most vicious being the one fought to pass the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. It took almost ten years to pass, and cost him any esteem the church once held for him, he was able to take away a great portion of power the elite had held within the church. The Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom earned him the title “enemy of religion” because with it he threatened those who gained power through the alliance of the church and state by questioning their authoritative ability to force individual opinion. The Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom was written in 1777, in it Jefferson calls for the end of “All attempts to influence religious belief by temporal punishments...”…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. Declaration of the Causes and Necessities of Taking Up Arms In this document, Thomas Jefferson begins with saying that if God intended for people to be slaves, he would have made it so. However, the British government, with lust for power, has overlooked this simple truth and is infringing on the rights of the colonists.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not even the smallest detail of God’s law will disappear until its purpose is achieved. So, if you ignore the least commandment and teach others to do the same, you will be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven. But anyone who obeys God’s laws and teaches them will be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. “But I warn you—unless your righteousness is better than the righteousness of the teachers of religious law and the Pharisees, you will never enter the Kingdom of Heaven!” (Matthew 5:17-20, New Living Translation).…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishment and Ethical Theories. Many people in the United States have opposing views on Capital punishment, which is also known as the death penalty. The death penalty is the process in which, convicted criminals are executed by a governing authority. Many other countries have abolished capital punishment but the United States still allows for this to happen in certain states. The death penalty is used for most terrible crimes such as murder, treason, or espionage but mainly for murder.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays