The Law Of Human Nature Analysis

Improved Essays
.1 The Law of Human Nature
As human beings, the author says we are like other creatures on earth that are governed by the laws of gravity, or certain biological laws that govern things on this earth; we have no choice but to obey. There is, though, one law that we can choose to obey or not. It is a law that we call the law of human decent behavior. It doesn't matter what part of the world we live in, Dr. Lewis says, people differ little when it comes to right and wrong as related to the law of human decent behavior. We do not always take it into consideration when we should be doing it to other people; nonetheless, we recognize indecent behavior when we are expecting it and do not receive it. There are two concerns, the author points out,
…show more content…
Unlike the law of nature that governs objects or non-human matter, it does not say what men do; it says, in fact, what men ought to do. Human beings realize or have some sense of that, he explains, and that they cannot have any real safety and happiness except in a society where everyone plays fair. It is because of this that they try to behave decently. Therefore, he concludes that the law of human nature is genuine — not simply something we made up.

1.4 What Lies Behind the Law
The author here says that the law of human nature must be: (1) something above and beyond the actual facts of human behavior, (2) something that cannot be discovered by science, and (3), something more like a mind than anything else we know. Nevertheless, it is conscious, has purpose, and prefers one thing to another. The author says some people attempt to explain the forces at work as something we can switch on and off, and does not put any demands on us — like reaping all the benefits and thrills of religion at none of the cost.

1.5 We Have Cause to Be
…show more content…
They seem to think that we will discover a new power later. That is not going to happen, says Dr. Lewis. They need to face the truth, and in doing so, he suggests three things they must do: (1) If one made a mistake in his thinking, he must go back to the place where he made the mistake and start on the right road; (2) They need to explore the alternatives; folks might accept the reality if they discover it on their own; And (3), they should not wait until they are desperate to try to understand Christianity like many people do. In essence, Dr. Lewis declares that one cannot hope to understand an idea or concept if he continues to move away from anything that may help him understand

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In John Piper’s article, Lessons from an Inconsolable Soul Learning from the Mind and Heart of C. S. Lewis, Piper writes on the facts that Lewis did not believe that the Bible was fully truth, he also believed that the Reformation could have been avoided, and he makes it the some people from other religions can be saved without knowing Christ. “There is almost no passage of Scripture on which I would turn to Lewis for exegetical illumination.” Piper does not believe that you can use Lewis to grow in understanding doctrine when it comes to the scriptures. Michael J. Christensen, in his book C. S. Lewis on Scripture, writes about the the fact that Lewis does not agree with evangelical fundamentalism in the fact that you can “be a dedicated evangelical” and accept the truthfulness and authority of scripture but disbelieve the book as a hole. These allegations put him at odds with people who praise his writings and call him an amazing apologetic…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Share your observations and impressions of the book and Lewis’s argument. The book "Mere Christianity" by C.S. Lewis offers an insight into the Christian world that I, and many other teenagers and even adults, probably have never even thought about or considered. When first reading the book I was frustrated with C.S. Lewis. The way he explained things made me feel as if he was trying to reach out to me, and any other reader, as if we were completely clueless to Christianity.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, during his teenage years, he became a professed atheist. Later in his life, he returned to Christianity and became famous for detailing his spiritual journey (Epperson, Gray, Hall, 45). In the article, “What Are We to Make of Jesus Christ” C.S. Lewis shares his personal beliefs about Christianity and provides valuable persuasions to refute certain non-Christian beliefs. The basis of C.S Lewis argument is that readers must accept or reject the story of what God intends to make of us.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cs Lewis Research Paper

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    C.S. Lewis: The Story Surrounding the Stunning Success Clive Staples Lewis An exceedingly renowned author, C.S. Lewis, has challenged the world of literature, reflecting his Christian values and life within his hundreds of books. “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen; not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.” (Lewis 140) Various agnostic scholars agree Lewis’ writing is impeccable and his theology is well-thought and credible.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccaleer V. Horsey 35 Md

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [N]either the common law nor any code of human law seeks to enforce the rule of perfect morality declared by divine authority, which acknowledges as its one principle the duty of doing to others as we would that others should do to us, and which, by consequence, absolutely excludes and prohibits all cunning and craft or astuteness practiced by any one for his own exclusive benefit. And it thence follows that a certain amount of selfish cunning passes unrecognized by Courts of justice, and that a man may procure to himself, in his dealings with others, some advantages to which he has no moral right, but to which he may succeed in establishing a perfect legal title. But if any one carries this too far: if by craft and selfish contrivance he inflicts an injury upon his neighbor and acquires a benefit to himself beyond a certain point.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is the way a human thinks, feels, and behaves. The authors; Jonathan Edwards, Olaudah Equiano, and Thomas Jefferson learn the importance of understanding human nature in Early American Texts, through written history. They all have distinctive views of human nature through the relationship of the government, law, religion, and equality. Edwards and Equiano are quite similar, believing human nature is cruel and brutal, whereas Jefferson differs from the two, believing in equality between the people. They use rhetorical strategies such as; imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to reveal how human nature should be carefully understood to be protected from being manipulated and to understand where it stands in society.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau uses the idea of humanity and machines throughout his essay “Civil Disobedience.” At one point, he uses them together, asking whether the soldiers marching toward a war they know to be unjust are “men at all,” or instead “small moveable forts and magazines” (77). The defining characteristic of men, for Thoreau, is their conscience. When these soldiers suppressed their conscience, they in turn reduced their humanity. Conscience is the God-given faculty by which people can decide right from wrong.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murder And Lying Analysis

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Before Rachels stated his stand regarding the cultural judgment of the “excision” he stated that we, all of the cultures should have at least some of our values or moral codes that each culture has in common. Rachels gives the example of Murder and lying to make his point that we all have some moral codes or virtues that are universal by stating “…there are some moral rules that all societies must have in common, because those rules are necessary for society to exist. The rules against lying and murder are two examples. And in fact, we do find these rules in force in all viable cultures. Cultures may differ in what they regard as legitimate exceptions to the rules, but this disagreement exists against a background of agreement on the larger…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The view of happiness as well as the role that pleasures and desires play in achieving happiness can be seen throughout Western philosophy. Detailing a hypothetical dinner conversation between Aristotle, Epicurus, Hobbes, and Epictetus, will such an understanding be described. In such an account, I will be detailing: what issue/s each guest would raise; what thesis would each defend, and how each would respond to the other; as well as who is most likely to disagree with whom and on which points, and who, on the other hand, might find allies or sympathizers. Each philosopher defines/views happiness differently. Aristotle defines happiness as an activity of the soul in accordance to virtue and reason.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Every person has their own political theory, whether they realize it or not. In a sense, a political theory is our ideas on how government and society should work. As a person becomes more educated and reads the works of other political and philosophical writers, the political theory expands. My political theory is a combination of not only my own opinions, but the ideas originally created by theorists such as John Locke and John Stuart Mill. Human nature is the beginning of any great political theory.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “On Human Nature” Refutation David Hull’s “On Human Nature” is an article written to oppose human nature. Specifically, it challenges human evolution as the cause of universality/commonality of human traits. The case made in the article utilizes the logic behind Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection: evolutionary changes come via the generation of variation in each generation and differential survival of individuals with different combinations of these varying traits. The central thesis of “On Human Nature” is that any common set of traits that people share is due to chance as opposed to the inner workings of evolution.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Ethics of Natural Law,” C.E. Harris explains the views of natural-law theorists. First, he states that the moral standard of natural law is that the actions that promote the values that follow the natural inclinations of human beings are right. These values include life, procreation, knowledge, and sociability. Anything, such as murder, birth control, stifling intellectual curiosity, or spreading lies, that opposes these four natural inclinations is wrong. Then, Harris notes that natural-law theory is absolutist, explaining that no values specified by natural inclinations may be violated and values cannot be measured or compared.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Curtis “Stickman” Brummitt Looking at the history of humanity, one can see that we are a people whom claim to have strong ties to morality, with the ability to actively determine right and wrong, yet every day we stray further and further from the rightness we so often claim to possess. Poets and writers, already known for criticizing humanity for its every flaw, have unsurprisingly leapt at the opportunity to again berate humans for their disregard for doing the right thing. “We must cultivate our garden.” The final crew in Voltaire’s Candide meet up with a wise, normal Muslim man near the end of the book.…

    • 1700 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is a theory that’s been a debated for centuries upon centuries. Philosophers have argued the concept for as long humans have been on this earth. Perhaps none the wiser than Plato, Socrates and Aristotle .The seemingly underlying truth is that there are characteristics; thinking, acting, feeling. That we all experience consciously or sub-consciously that make humans do the things that they do.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each individual has a different understanding of what the word “bad” or “evil” mean. If one person believes that stealing is bad, another person might believe that stealing is a good thing if it serves the greater good, for example, Robin Hood. The words “bad” and “good” are subjective and can vary in people’s views. Yet, by looking at the world today, it is difficult to say that humans are naturally good. However, when a child is brought into this world, one tends to associate them with purity and innocence.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays