Introduction
The American judicial system operates on the premise that justice is served best when both sides to a dispute possess the ability to enter evidence while at the same time challenging the evidence of the other party. Through this, a sharp development on the facts of the dispute is achieved. The states as well as the federal governments in the United States are authorized to prosecute crime regardless of the fact that they both have different court systems, criminal statutes, police agencies and prosecutors. While the federal systems oversees limited range of criminal cases for instance dealing with people accused of violating criminal laws of the national governments, state systems monitors the decision of lower courts within the …show more content…
According to Carlson (2010), various causes for instance advance publicity creates an atmosphere that is not conducive to a fair trial in the location where the crime occurred. This implies that transferring the venue the venue to a different location increases the chances of a fair trial.
Key role within federal and state judicial systems
The American judicial systems play a very important role in administering justice in the nation. By for instance carrying out legal research and drafting, overseeing pretrial matters and assuming the responsibility of the operations of the court, judges are enabled by various professional for instance law clerks, assistant judges and court administrators to focus on the demands of adjudication, a process that facilitates efficient operation of the judicial system (Gur-Arie, 2004). Judicial systems decide on the constitutionality of the laws while at the same time resolving disputes.
Processes of judicial …show more content…
At this stage, the parties use discovery, pleadings as well as pretrial conferences to identify the legal issues and facts involved in the dispute.
Trial stage
Here, the parties present evidence to the jury or the judge. The rules of evidence dictate the form by which the evidence ought to be presented as well as the types of questions the witnesses are required to answer. Through a trial verdict, the losing party is given the opportunity of challenging the decision of the court.
Appeal
The structure of the court as well as the nature of the case allows the party that loses the case at the appellate level to re-appeal to a higher level appellate court (Hogan, n.d). Judges often chooses to hear cases that have the greatest judicial significance.
Statute of limitations on charging and trying
The American judicial system operates on the premise that justice is served best when both sides to a dispute possess the ability to enter evidence while at the same time challenging the evidence of the other party. Through this, a sharp development on the facts of the dispute is achieved. The states as well as the federal governments in the United States are authorized to prosecute crime regardless of the fact that they both have different court systems, criminal statutes, police agencies and prosecutors. While the federal systems oversees limited range of criminal cases for instance dealing with people accused of violating criminal laws of the national governments, state systems monitors the decision of lower courts within the …show more content…
According to Carlson (2010), various causes for instance advance publicity creates an atmosphere that is not conducive to a fair trial in the location where the crime occurred. This implies that transferring the venue the venue to a different location increases the chances of a fair trial.
Key role within federal and state judicial systems
The American judicial systems play a very important role in administering justice in the nation. By for instance carrying out legal research and drafting, overseeing pretrial matters and assuming the responsibility of the operations of the court, judges are enabled by various professional for instance law clerks, assistant judges and court administrators to focus on the demands of adjudication, a process that facilitates efficient operation of the judicial system (Gur-Arie, 2004). Judicial systems decide on the constitutionality of the laws while at the same time resolving disputes.
Processes of judicial …show more content…
At this stage, the parties use discovery, pleadings as well as pretrial conferences to identify the legal issues and facts involved in the dispute.
Trial stage
Here, the parties present evidence to the jury or the judge. The rules of evidence dictate the form by which the evidence ought to be presented as well as the types of questions the witnesses are required to answer. Through a trial verdict, the losing party is given the opportunity of challenging the decision of the court.
Appeal
The structure of the court as well as the nature of the case allows the party that loses the case at the appellate level to re-appeal to a higher level appellate court (Hogan, n.d). Judges often chooses to hear cases that have the greatest judicial significance.
Statute of limitations on charging and trying