Kantian Theory Of Religion

Decent Essays
What would “Christianity” look like after the application of Kantian theory of Religion? This religion could not call itself “Christian” because they do not worship a Christ of Faith. Nor could they be called “Jesusists” because they are not following the teachings of Jesus the historical figure. What a Kantian “religion” would look like today is related closely to what we call the “New Age” faith. Although New Age best describes what Kant would accept as a pure religion, a Kantian religion would be comprised of a group of extremely confused individuals who would truly never achieve anything. There would be no religion. The Christian religion is based on the divine nature of a man named Jesus. Jesus was a human who, depending on the denomination …show more content…
If this is so then, the Kingdom of God could not currently be established, nor could it ever be established. The Kingdom of God, according to the teachings of Jesus is free from evil. Evil still exists on earth, so there could be no Kingdom now. Also, according to Kant, man can never achieve the highest good, so the Kingdom of God on Earth could never be established, because there is no evil in the Kingdom of God according to the teachings of Jesus, who Kant believes we should learn from. If Kant means that the kingdom is to come then how can it come if we cannot fully reach the highest good? Also, how can the kingdom of God be on earth when Kant has eliminated the entire way of how we get to the kingdom of God by eliminating the fact that Jesus teaches us that He died for sins which sins is what makes us unworthy of coming into the kingdom of God. Many of the teachings of Jesus are based on things that cannot be reasonable according to Kant, because they involve what Kant describes as supernatural. So how can Jesus be the model for how to achieve …show more content…
Religion is an example of the moral law. Moral law is first and a “religion” is built around it. This is why Kant thinks he is Christian. He sees that Christianity out of all the “religions” is the best example of moral law. The teachings of Christ best conform to his idea of what is moral. Christ is just a teacher. The teachings of Jesus the man best represent what Kant believes is moral law. Therefor he follows the teachings of Jesus. But it is not the teachings of Jesus that make him Christ: it is the “supernatural” events surrounding the birth, life death, and resurrection of the man Jesus that make Him Christ. Therefore, to follow the teachings of Jesus does not make a person a Christian. It is the acceptance of the supernatural events surrounding His life that make a Christian. This makes Kant no different from a person who follows the teachings of a prophet. Jesus was not just a prophet; He was God

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    People don’t believe in God based on an argument. The belief is simply that, something one just knows to be true, like that the world didn't just pop into existence five seconds ago. Therefore, there is no conflict between the two. On the contrary, there does seem to be a conflict between a particular religion, naturalism and science (evolution). Naturalism is the belief that there isn't any such person as God.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Inerrancy Doctrine

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction Christians believe that the Bible in its entirety is the inerrant word God; they base their foundation on what the Bible says which is supposed to be inspired by God, and written by man. Some of the reasons Christians believe that the Bible is the word of God are because it gives mankind a sense of purpose, a reason for living. Another reason has to do with simply that it gives the best explanation for the world coming to existence. Due to the fact Christians believe the Bible to be true, they apply to all areas of there lives, such as controversial topics like homosexuality as alternate way of living. By contemporizing the scripture, it makes the Bible relevant to all areas of life in this current time.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Holy Spirit is “in the category of the Self-existent” in that He is not something that was begotten in time. Nazienzus’ opponents try to suggest that the Holy Spirit is some sort of cosmic accident caused by the will of God, but this is nonsensical. How can an accident fill people like John the Baptist and Sampson to do such mighty works in the name of the Lord, yet be subverted to the role of a cosmic accident? The Holy Spirit is not simply an activity either, for the Holy Spirit “has all the qualities which belong clearly to one that moves” and not simply the qualities of movement itself. If the Holy Spirit is simply a person, but not the divine person, “how are we made perfect in Him,” and how does He conform people into the image of God?…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Higher Consciousness

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jesus was never meant to be an intermediary between the people and God and he was not supposed to be the world 's saviour - at least not in the way that people have been conditioned to believe by the world 's religions. Rather, he was to be an example, someone who through tremendous struggle (and temptation) had found the way by finding the innocence within. Through his example the people would be able to find God within. (The Kingdom of Heaven was within, Jesus had stated over and over…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Her understanding of God is completely against Barth’s understanding. Barth would never think of God as a man. His understanding is based on keeping God in center and thus is not derived from the human experiences. He says we can refer to God only as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. And we can refer to God as the trinity because of the revelation of God in history.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Christians believe that there is only one true god and that they are not holy enough to be gods themselves. Mormons don’t believe in original sin. This makes it hard for them to understand why Jesus had to die. Christians believe that when Jesus died, all people would be born into sin and must accept Jesus to be cleansed of that sin. Mormons also believe that god has a physical body.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For example, the Trinity is not a term that can be found in the Bible, but it can be proved with other verses that speak specifically to the fact that God the Father, Jesus (the Son), and the Holy Spirit are equally God and all possess the attributes of God. However, there is no evidence in scripture that speaks specifically to the notion that "we are to live 'heaven to earth '". The definition claims whatever is in heaven should be on earth. This is not true outside of the context of the "new heaven and a new earth" that John mentions in Revelation 21:1-2. We know the new heaven and earth are not to be experienced now because John gives us the context in v.1 telling us WHEN this will happen, "for the first heaven and the first earth passed away".…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Still, Behe’s bias disqualifies his argument from bearing the title of science. A supernatural cause is not one that can be reliably tested to any extent, and it is immune to falsifiability. Behe’s leap from natural evidence to the existence of God is a personal choice with no natural evidence to support it. If he intended to stay within the realms of science, then it would be necessary to draw a natural conclusion. One way to do this is by suggesting the Darwinian evolution mechanism is incapable of explaining the complexity of several biological complexes.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atheism Vs Religion

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Questions have also arisen concerning the origin of god where people have found it hard to believe that god might have arisen from nothing. As the Christians claim that god is the creator, then one is bound to ask about who created the god who created everything (Hancock, 1996). Omniscience is also a paradox that atheists find very contradictory. This is based on the idea that this god knows everything and by so doing, he cannot forget but the paradox is that by forgetting some things, then he does not then know everything as claimed. For example, when god forgets his people and lets them suffer then it is true that he does not indeed exist (Drachman,…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Demism Theory Of Religion

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine that you could not say “God, give me strength to deal with this fool.” Can you. Our founding fathers did. Deism is not a religion, but a way to use reason to understand and perceive the world around us. The concept of Deism is that God does not interact at all with our lives, and that he does not care what happens to us. This sounds harsh, and even gives you chills just to think this way.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics