The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Decent Essays
Two years later, in 1854, President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act mandated popular sovereignty, which allowed settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders. This bill overturned the Missouri Compromise’s use of latitude as the boundary between slave and free territory. Conflicts arose which led to a period of violence, known as Bleeding Kansas. One event after another occurred, such as the Dred Scott Decision and John Brown taking armory at Harpers Ferry. Lastly, in 1860, Abraham Lincoln won the Presidential election. The South threatened to succeed from the Union if Lincoln was elected, and they followed through. This quickly led to the Civil

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Bleeding America The Kansas-Nebraska Act, a act proposed by "Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democratic Senator from Illinois who introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act"1 in hopes for the nation to build a transcontinental-railroad, hopefully having the eastern terminus in Chicago, but the railroad needed to be secure as it was going to go through the Kansas and Nebraska territories, preferably as states. Being a personal advocate of popular sovereignty, Stephen A. Douglas disliked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and believed that the state should decide if it wants to be a free-state or a slave-state. Although the North and South were clearly different culturally and economically, separated by their own definition of the American Dream, the passing…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown descended from Puritan ancestry, although it is unknown exactly who his ancestors were. Brown himself believed that his first paternal ancestor came to America on the Mayflower and was named Peter Brown. There are several other theories stating that Brown’s ancestors settled in Connecticut or Massachusetts later on. Maternally, there is speculation about when his family migrated to America, but his mother, Ruth Mills, was also of Puritan descent. The Puritan principles that Brown’s family adopted were based upon those of Calvinism, and so he was devout, plain, and stern in his beliefs.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fort Sumter Essay

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The events leading to the outbreak of the Civil War quickly snowballed and became much more severe than the previous ones. Leading up to the attack on Fort Sumter, the North and the South already had contrasting views on several issues not only on slavery, but also what the center of the economy should be based on and the limits of power the government ought to have. The Election of 1860 proved to be a breaking point for the South after Abraham Lincoln was elected. First and foremost, Lincoln was not even on any Southern ballots. In addition, the newly elected president was a Republican and having him lead the country would nearly destroy the Southern economy and ideals.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was signed, Stephen Douglas offered popular sovereignty, making people decide whether to have their territory slave free or not. This act terminated the Missouri Compromise. In addition, to this in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In 1860, Lincoln’s election convinced whites in the Lower South that Slavery and the society that they had built on it was at risk in the Union, and they seceded. Also the bloody violence that erupted in…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act has been called the most significant law ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It was called the most significant law ever enacted because it allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law had three major features, which were a larger territory of Nebraska was dissected into two smaller territories, Kanas and Nebraska, the dissolution of the Missouri compromise, and the new territories would determine its slavery status based on popular sovereignty. When the new law went into effect pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election. Instead…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was devised as a compromise over slavery in 1854, as the nation was beginning to be torn apart in the decade before the Civil War. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act created territories for both Kansas and Nebraska. This gave a chance for people to move slavery to the Midwest.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The phrase "Bleeding Kansas" is used to describe and represent the violent hostilities between anti and pro slavery forces during the time period of the settlement of the Kansas territory during the 1850's. The most significant act that brought Kansas into the eyes of the nation was the tragedy that occurred after the creation of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act used the concept of popular sovereignty and let the citizens determine which area became a free state and which would be a slave state. Anti slavery and pro slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try and influence the opinion and decision of the residents presently living there. Soon after, violence surfaced when both sides started to battle for authoritative…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people of the United States believed it was their god given right to expand from the Atlantic Ocean, east to the Pacific Ocean, North to Canadian border, and South to Mexico. This idea of Manifest Destiny fueled the expansion into the West. Big indicators of Manifest Destiny were the use of the Oregon Trail, and the Mexican – American War. Despite Manifest Destiny bringing about an increase in sectionalism and conflict, it also allowed for the expansion of territory and fueled movement into the west. With people moving west into the newly claimed territory, there was controversy whether the territories would become free or slave states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Brown Dbq Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Brown DBQ John Brown’s actions at Harper’s Ferry in October 1859 created a lasting strain that developed between the northern and southern regions of the United States from the years 1859 to 1863. The North’s political and ideological view quickly aligned with Brown’s abolitionist ideology and efforts, establishing a culture that condemned Brown’s actions but illuminated his cause. The progressive is North took into account John Brown’s cause as a cause of benevolence that advocated the innate rights of man. Such thought brought more abolitionist ideology to establish itself in the north causing further tension between the North and the South’s views on slavery. The South, on the other hand, supported slavery and justified it through the…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays