Provincial Court System

Great Essays
In Canada, there are many rules and regulations that are followed by the citizens and members of the courts. The laws are practised in the provincial, federal and supreme courts. The provincial court is the lowest court in which cases are heard. “The court is an important place where public and private issues are resolved” (McCormick 1994, p.2). The justice system is based on an adversarial system in which the disputes that occur are represented by people who study the law. There are many representatives of the court such as the judge, lawyer, officer, court clerk and court reporter. All of the representatives assist in running the cases in court and by making the right decisions. The reason to study the members of the court is because they …show more content…
They sit in the front facing the judge and court clerk. Defendants that are the accused have lawyers who are also referred as attorneys. Lawyers represent the accused to ensure that they are proved innocent. They must evaluate the evidence and defend their clients. The lawyers role is “not to criticize anyone as an individual; rather it is to assess the validity and reliability of the evidence and testimony used by the prosecutor” (Goffman 2014, p. 264). During this, a lawyer must also be able to protect the legal rights of the client. Furthermore, the lawyer must insure that the accused receives the fairest trial and or is able to help the accused be dismissed from all charges on them. At first the lawyers use casual language that all people in the courtroom understand, however as soon as they use legal terms it is difficult for the other non-professionals to understand making the ambiance more intimidating (G. Musico, N. Gill, C. Nguyen and S. Dole). The lawyers are well prepared before a case, so when they approach the judge, they are quick enough to decide whether they need time, or what kind of questions they need to ask the …show more content…
The police officer or the deputy sheriff stands behind or beside the defendant. In the bail hearing court the officer was seen sitting down with a desk going over details of the people who would be appearing in court. On the other hand, there were two officers during the ‘Chad trial’ one was sitting beside the accused and the second officer was beside the witness. The police officer must ensure the safety of all people present at the court of the time being. The officer is the one who must bring the accused to the court. They maintain order in the courtroom and supervise the trails or any other cases being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mighty Judgement Summary

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the book Mighty Judgement, Philip Slayton talks about the Supreme Court of Canada as a government institution which needs reform on the premises that Supreme Court of Canada is powerful, paternalistic, competent, undemocratic, and secretive. Slayton begins with the question of whether judges make or interpret the law and whether they should be doing only one of those things. Also, he describes the historical past of the Supreme Court, and how the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms affected the cases which reach the Supreme Court. Slayton also analyzed the Supreme Court of Canada and came up with possible overdue reforms based on his experience as a lawyer, academic, and a previous Supreme Court clerk.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cousin Vinny Ethics

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lawyers, witnesses, the judge, and the bailiff all make up the cast seen in an average trial. In My…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Canadian Justice System

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When it comes to the Canadian Criminal Justice System, we ask many questions such as, “what is justice?”and “are equity and the rights of the accused being compromised in the name of efficiency?” Justice is when a person receives fairness and their moral rightness from the legal system which is decided by attorney 's, judges, legislatures, and by society. Based on this definition of justice, we wonder if equity and the rights of the accused is being compromised by the legal system. Many people may think that the Canadian Criminal Justice System may be unfair and not seek justice for those who deserve it, others may argue against that and believe that the Canadian Criminal Justice System shows equity and the rights of the accused. Sometimes…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Australian government as do other British colonies, partake in the adversary system which establishes protocol of civil or criminal cases, however, there are other judicial systems the commonwealth governments could establish. This discussion will compare and evaluate the differences of the adversary and the inquisitorial system while associating the weaknesses and strengths of the judges and the jury for the systems. The adversary system is used commonly by the colonies of Britain *yet many countries such as France and Germany practice inquisitorial*. As seen in Hollywood, the adversary system always has one judge and twelve juries with two parties competing to defeat another.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The British North America Act, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms have created a situation in which the legislation to protect the people from the power of the Court is muddled down, and what is left is an oligarchy of people from one singular ethnic background and very similar socializations. The ability of the Court to strike-down legislation written by a democratically elected commons defies the will of the people. Thus subjecting them to live by what another body believes ought to be morally and legally right, showing that this institution challenges the democratic values of Canada, and is operating with an excessive amount of…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Australia's court system consists of various courts at both federal, state and territory levels, with the High Court of Australia being the highest court in the judicial system. The three main courts at state/territory level are the Local Court, District Court and Supreme Court. The Local Court deals with committal criminal hearings, as well as civil cases with a monetary value of up to $100,000. The Children's Court and the Coroner's court also reside on this local level. The District Court has appellate jurisdiction and deals with more serious criminal cases, as well as civil cases with a monetary value of up to $750,000.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human societies have always required systems to maintain balance, order, and control. The foundation of human civilization spawned from a rapid growth in population during the neolithic era, compelling communities to form hierarchical systems, and early ideas of law. While, during the millennia that followed, ideological and technological progress compelled these systems to evolve and improve, history reveals a repetitive continuity connecting the past and present. The decisions, systems, and mistakes made in the past inevitably echo into the future, our occasional capacity to learn from these mistakes notwithstanding.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jury system came to Canada by the British settlers in the mid-1700s and is composed of 12 representatives of the community to provide judgment by peers (v+n). “The purpose of a trial is to answer the question of who did what to whom and whether such conduct is legal” (v+n). The jury acts as adjudicators and are called triers of facts that serve the purpose of listening to evidence and facts presented in court in order to decide who did what to whom and if such conduct was legal, out of the competing interpretations of events presented in court by the defendants and plaintiffs (v+n). The jury is presented with differing versions of one event and has the duty of taking into account all aspects of the case in order to make a final verdict…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Their answer was to establish multiple new courts at different levels of jurisdiction; including trial, appellate, and supreme court levels. They assigned particular duties and responsibilities to each level of court, from regulating ordinances and city laws to handling minor disputes like property and divorce. One especially important model that was adapted for use in state courts was the New York State Field Code of 1848. This code clarified jurisdictional claims of different issues and gave specifics in the matter of court procedures and regulations. It also established a set of simplified rules for pleadings and how they were to be brought before the court in different situations.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Australian Government is dedicated to make the federal civil justice system less complex and more accessible to Australians whom may enter the system. Access to justice is about ensuring that Australians receive the appropriate advice and assistance they need, despite the way they enter the justice system. The Attorney General’s Department is responsible for coordinating government policies and projects in order to improve access to justice. It incorporates everything people do to try and resolve disputes they may have. This can include accessing information and support to prevent, identify and resolve all disputes.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system has some stereotypes of being inefficient and ineffective, but there is a lot more to the story that shows the complexity and intricacies of the justice system. During the past two or three weeks, I have participated in a mock trial case as both as a witness and as a juror. From these experiences, I have learned a lot about the justice system. My new found knowledge and respect for the justice system can be broken down into two categories: the structure/professionalism and the framing of this case or any case. The atmosphere of structure and professionalism was seen with the lengthy process of the procedure of the current laws and the procedure of direct and cross examination on the witness in question.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Police utilize lineups on a regular basis and it is an accepted investigatory procedure in identify a possible suspect from a witness. A defendant does have the right to counsel in a lineup. The major concern is the intentional or even the unintentionally problem of the police influencing a possible witness ("What Are Your Rights During A Police Lineup?"). This could happen when the police conduct the lineup they could have the suspect stand out from the rest of the other people that they are using, example would be the suspect is Asian and they put mostly Hispanic people in the lineup with him.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I visited the Riverside Country Superior court in Murrieta, California. Where I sat in on two parts of legal environments in a course. Before finding out which court room I would go in to observe a case. I sat in the master calendar room. In this room each case is pushed into a different court room.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three-Tiered Court System

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the three-tiered structure of the Federal Court System and compare it to the three-tiered structure of the California Court system? What is the purpose and function of each level The three tiered structure of the Federal Court is represented by the US District Courts, US Circuit Court of Appeals and the US Supreme Court's. Each individual level serves as a different function during Criminal and Civil Cases. The three Tiered Structure of California is represented by the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal as well as Trial Courts.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays