English Jury System Analysis

Superior Essays
Over the years, the role and the responsibility of the jury have been through numerous transformations, hence these improvements made the presence of jury trials a highly controversial topic, leading to the question ‘Are juries needed in the English legal system?’. This essay aims to argue this question from different perspectives. It will first describe the evolution of the jury system and their current role in UK justice. Then, it will go through to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of having such a system using relevant cases. Lastly, it will mention the alternatives for the jury system and conclude by providing an answer to the question mentioned above.
Juries who are now regarded as one of the most fundamental part of the English
…show more content…
Unlike the judges, a jury does not have to follow the acts of the Parliament. This is referred to as ‘Jury Equity’. The secrecy of the jury room supports the idea of ‘Jury Equity’ a lot as the jury is protected from outside influences as well as harassment and thus, can give verdicts that may be different from the precedents of past cases. For instance, in the case of R v Ponting, a Ministry of Defence official Clive Ponting was charged with leaking information to an MP, which concerned the sinking of an Argentinian cruiser during the Falklands conflict. During the case, the trial judge made it clear that the defendant should be condemned under the Official Secret Act 1920. However, the jury believed that Ponting should not be found guilty, giving no legal defence. As a result, Clive Ponting walked free from the court without getting any convictions. The case is currently counted as one of the wins of the jury system because a not guilty verdict was reached despite the opinion of the trial …show more content…
Unlike general bias, racial bias develops over a long time. Therefore, the idea of racism cannot be eliminated from a juror’s mind just in one day. The random selection of the jury makes the issue even harder as it is impossible to tell just by looking at whether someone has racial prejudice or not. Over the years, there has been a considerable number of different cases showing signs of racism. One of the most famous cases related to this matter is Gregory v UK. In the case, the black applicant David Gregory was being convicted for robbery. While the negotiations of the jury were continuing, a note was given to the trial judge saying a member of the jury is showing racial overtones and needs to be dismissed. In turn, the judge guided the jury to reach a verdict without involving any racial bias but only by considering the evidences presented to them. Thus, the jurors sentenced Mr. Gregory to six years of prison sentence. Afterwards, Mr. Gregory applied to the European Court of Human Rights with the complaint that there was a breach of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. Article 6.1 of the Convention states that everyone has the right to a fair hearing. However, the judge dissented the claim as there weren’t any evidence showing a subjective bias by the jury. A similar scenario took

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When the jurors are “placed in a cramped box and held up there for days or even weeks at a time” (Document B), then their decision may be slightly different due to their boredom and/or want to leave. This may not always be a problem; however, I know that if I was trapped there and not allowed to leave until the jury came to a decision, then I might just throw in the towel of what I actually believe and just go with the majority vote. Another reason that this example verdict may not be correct is judges have a “reasoned and professional judgment” (Document B), but I cannot say the same for juries. A jury is by no means professional, as they are random citizens that know from a range of nothing about law or omniscient about law. This is proven by cartoon 1 of Document where near three-fourths of the jury are focusing on something other than the trial (Document…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There is cases that are presented that are not necessarily justifiable to what the law says its right and wrong and there can be many factors that play into why a certain individual in a special case may not be guilty even though there is clear evidence that the crime was committed. It gives the jury a chance to plug in the factors of who, what, where, when and why and to treat each case as its own. Having the responsibility to use your own judgment holds great potential in a jury system as well as having a wide variety of people from different backgrounds leads to having a wide variety of opinions in a…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, when the prosecution does the exact same, then it is seen as mere execution of judicial powers. But there is no suggestion why one is better than the other, besides the fact that prosecutors are more susectible to corruption as opposed to everyday people who come together in the court for a single case (Somin, 2015, para. 2, ad 3). The author implies that the Founders placed such power in peoples hands to keep the government in check and make sure it does not exercise more power than it actually has. Consequently, the criminal and civil laws that are exercised in modern days might confuse jury members themselves. That is, there are crimes which should not be illegal at all or carry much lesser penalties, hence, jury nullification is more possible in these instances, rather than in broadly accepted…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the inclusion of everyday citizens in a trial, it fosters political and civil engagement among citizens. Juries uphold their political power with the use of jury nullification. “the right of juries to nullify or refuse…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Nullification Case

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The two landmark Supreme Court decisions related to race and the death penalty are Lockett v Ohio and Kennedy v Louisiana. In Lockett v Ohio: 21 years old Sandra Lockett, was the getaway driver for a robbery in which resulted in the murder of a pawnshop owner. She was convicted under the statue of Ohio and was found guilty because she initiated the robbery. An Ohio law required that individuals found guilty of aggravated murder be given the death penalty (LOCKETT v OHIO, 2015). She was sentenced to death in April of 1975.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Secret Power of Jury Nullification Response In the Podcast “The Life of the Law, Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification”, Shannon Heffernan explains the often overlook power of jury nullification in the U.S. court system. She defines nullification as, when a jury is convinced that a defendant is guilty but find the defendant innocent anyway. Heffernan provides examples of cases throughout history that aid the idea that nullification among juries can potentially benefit courtroom justice. She also weights its negative effects that cause potentially major injustices in courtrooms.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander Manuel is an African American Judge grew up without any awareness of racism until he was charged with disorderly conduct for a simple parking incident. After that moment he has been subject to racial profiling and discrimination on multiple occasions. Manuel continues by mentioning how his white colleagues are surprised and try to rationalize any answer except racial bias. He then suggests that, “white judges are insensitive to racial issues in their courtrooms” because they themselves are used to unknowingly being preferred and consequently unable to recognize, “when subtle racial attitudes pervade their courtroom” (Manuel). Fortunately, there have been many trail-blazers for getting rid of bias in the courtroom.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    R. V. Williams Case Study

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main prejudice in this case is that William and the defence were afraid that the jury panel would be biased on the verdict because he was an aboriginal. There are four specific types of prejudices discovered in the case: interest, specific, generic and conformity (R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128. 31. Supreme Court. 04 June 1998.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The majority of the jurors did not follow ‘innocent until proven guilty’, rather, they worked the opposite way. This is due to their personal biases. Under Juror 8’s influence, the men began ’talking for an hour’ using ‘reasonable doubt’, thus allowing the men to reach a sensible conclusion. This may have otherwise cost the life of a minor. The film exposes through Juror 8 that the superficial evidence should be dismissed to allow for deeper analysis of the case.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the anonymity of the jury is protected in certain cases, as there is the security threat to the jury in criminal cases. The selection of a jury is done by the defense and the prosecution. Potential jurors are selected from the pool of citizens and their anonymity is protected in some of the criminal cases to safeguard their lives and this practice is followed in Maryland. When the court gathers the pool of jurors, the defense and the prosecution started challenging the member during the examination of Voir dire. The process of Voir dire is taken place by the prosecutor and the defense to ensure the bias feeling of the…

    • 3284 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | | | |Young jurors no life experience. | |Ordinary honest citizens applying local knowledge and values. |Jury members can have a string of convictions not serious enough to | | |disqualify.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics