The Juror In 12 Angry Men By Reginald Rose

Improved Essays
In the play, 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, the characters of this story appear to be nothing more than average people picked to stand and listen to a case of a boy accused of homicide. As the characters are supposed to leave personal issues at the door of the case, some appear to use them against the boy. Using these imperfect jurors, people can see how that when insecurities, flaws, and the law form together, the justice system can be found. The justice system is neither perfect nor is it imperfect. To sum it up, is people are put to the test of humanity to decide what must become of the case. The jurors in 12 Angry Men make this case rather complicated, but it all soon unravels into the truth, and a fate is decided between the jurors. Since the characters of the story …show more content…
This man is practically the whole reason why everyone questions their decisions of the boy. He saw no reason as to why they shouldn’t sit in and talk a little about the case before shipping someone off to their death. Referring to figure 1, notice that Juror 8 is a speech bubble. He takes on this role due to the fact he was the only one not afraid to stand out and make an opinion upon the other eleven jurors. “There were eleven votes for guilty. It's not so easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.” (12 Angry Men). On the outside, he is a golden yellow because he gave a sense of hope for the kid that he was innocent through the middle of it all. Jurors that simply went off of their gut were repulsive to him. He didn’t understand as to why they didn’t want to make a change in the case. For example, juror seven. He went off his ‘gut’, impatient this man was (same as all), Juror eight took note of that as he (Juror 7) changed his vote without reasoning. On the inside the color is a soft blue and in the middle it fades to white. That represented Juror eight as to mean he is calm in some situations. For

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Juror number three is a very stubborn and opinionated man. In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, twelve men must decide the fate of a young boy who is said to have killed his father. Juror number three really does not like to be wrong, especially when it contradicts something that he has believed in for a long time. He yells at all the people that do not agree with him, no matter what the subject is. He also believes that there are facts, that can not be proven false, that point to the kid being guilty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    So they all take a vote on what the boys fate will be. Eleven of the jurors say death, but juror number eight votes not guilty. This is because he is not convinced of the boy…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the movie, every juror is convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime; but there is one juror, juror number eight pleads not guilty. He pleaded not guilty because he wanted to discuss the case…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film exposes through Juror 8 that the superficial evidence should be dismissed to allow for deeper analysis of the case. Without the actions of Juror 8, the boy would have been convicted of the crime and accused for something he may not have done. Reginald Rose has used his film, Twelve Angry Men, to critique the jury system by pointing out the flaws present. Racism, personal biases, unwillingness to cooperate and accusing someone incorrectly were all obstacles that each of the jurors had to face to reach the final verdict. It is with these factors that one can critique the jury system and judge whether or not the system is really doing us…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Twelve Angry Men” displays an interesting story with compelling characters. This play plays with your mind on about who’s right and wrong. The case tricks the Juror's mind if the boy is even guilty at all. This starts a huge drama story with a few cases of confusion . The “Hero” of the play or the person who convinced every Juror that the boy was Not-guilty is Juror Eight.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Then juror #2 responds, “TWO (nervously laughing). Well … I guess … they’re entitled”. This boy’s life is in jeopardy and these men are joking about why the case took so long. the most noted argument in my mind was after every single juror voted guilty in the first vote except for juror #8 who voted not guilty. This wasn 't because he definitely thought the boy was not guilty, he said he didn 't know whether he was or not which is considered a reasonable doubt.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the story Twelve Angry Men the jurors initially cast their ballots based upon prejudice, pressure, and manipulation. As juror number Eight begins to force these eleven men of the jury to reason we come closer to a verdict that more closely resembles justice. When being asked why he believes the boys story number Eight responds “I don’t know whether I believe it or not. Maybe I don’t”. this line of thinking is akin to Socrates whom is quoted saying “True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing”.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Our judicial system is one that influences people of all walks of life and it has influenced people for generations, there is no escaping it. In 12 Angry Men, Juror #8 was able to convince the other jurors to believe that the boy was innocent, he convinced Juror #4, who then said, “I’m sorry. I’m convinced. I don’t think I’m wrong often but I guess I was this once. There is a reasonable doubt in my mind.” (Rose 62) Juror #8 was able to argue using the facts to persuade his fellow jurors to see the boy as innocent so that they did not send an innocent man to his death.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later throughout the movie groupthinking becomes less and less common as everyone else starts to make realizations and thinking outside of the box to prove the young man’s innocence. However there were some norms formed throughout this movie. One of the norms established by the group was that at first eleven out of the twelve men followed the popular belief that the accused was guilty. Another norm was how the eleven men expectedly fought Davis, because they strongly believed that they were right and he was wrong. They did not let him express his thoughts properly without insulting his way of thinking.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 7 demonstrates this passivity in 12 Angry Men when he abruptly changes his vote to not guilty. While being questioned for it, the only reasoning her gives is that he wanted to get the deliberations over with. Juror 7 displays his disregard for what happens in the trial and dissolves his opinion on what he believes to be true. He allows Juror 8 to easily persuade him without…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays