Ethics In Immanuel Kant's Ethical Analysis

Improved Essays
To begin with, when there is any controversial issue, it is important to take perspectives from the scholars of the past, and to learn about what they have to offer. For obvious reasons, it isn 't possible to get their opinions on the specific issues. But it is possible to use their doctrines that they wrote about and apply them to the real world scenarios in question. The conflict that recently caught the media’s attention is about CEO Martin Shkreli. To be more specific the questions: “is what he is doing fair? Should he do it? And how does it reflect his character?” Are all easily more definable because of the input given from previous philosophers; and how they can be applied to other real world issues of the past, which was all represented in Justice by Sandel.
For one thing, pharmaceutical companies have been taking advantage of the sick for far too long. There are more cases just like this one happening all the time. If you look at the prices of prescription
…show more content…
One of Kant 's major questions regarding human ethics is “does my action respect the goals of human beings rather than merely using them for my own purposes?” (csus.edu) The short answer to that question is, no. Shkreli’s actions of raising Daraprim from $13.50 a pill to $750 a pill does not respect the goals of mankind. What he is doing doesn 't benefit, or improve mankind. The only people benefiting from this price gouging are the people of Turing Pharmaceuticals. The rest of America is suffering, even though only a small number of people actually use this medication; it is setting a precedent throughout the rest of the nation that behavior like this is being tolerated. What he is doing is purely for his own purpose and not for anyone else 's. According to Kant, if the answer to the question aforementioned is “no”, then the person should not carry about the action in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Daraprim Case Study

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This was made apparent during questioning when overnight the 60 year old drug went from $13 per pill to the current $750 per pill. She states the cost is justified in order to do research and development for all of the disease that are…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, profit is the number one concern for these drug companies as proved by using Kant’s second categorical imperative. The large pharmaceutical companies spend money to market their expensive drugs that they want consumers to purchase. They decide which medications will be marked directly to you. If direct-to-consumer advertising was illegal, the money saved on advertising costs might lower the costs for drugs. This current practice uses patients as a means to reach the company’s end, which is profit.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the ethical issues in this case? There are several ethical issues involved with the marketing done by Big Pharma. There concerned about making the most money with their drugs rather than focus on develop newer drugs. I think it is completely unethical that the companies, “ starts its promotion techniques while the doctors are still in medical school.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Shkreli (who is considered to some as the most hated man in America) is an entrepreneur is a CEO of a major pharmaceutical company that provides treatment for AIDs/ cancer patients. He is a business man who realized that he could make millions off these patients since there is no cure for these types of diseases. He saw the opportunity to raise the cost of these drugs from about $15 to an estimated $700 for each pill! I don't believe this is ethical and I'm sure there are many more companies doing the same.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, if everyone lives how he pleases, disregarding other people’s rights, freedoms, and needs anarchy and chaos will ensue. Even though we each may have our own ethics to uphold, we cannot impose our liberties and beliefs on others because it infringes upon other people’s way of life. Mill’s concept of utilitarianism encourages people to practice their liberties only if it does not cause harm to others, otherwise interference is necessary (Mill 1863). Martin Shkreli’s decision to boost the prices for a life-saving drug results in worldwide discontent and also causes harm to the pregnant women, the ill, and the elderly (McLean 2015). Shkreli violates Mill’s philosophy, and by doing so, he does not contribute beneficial moral actions to society and causes global displeasure.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Daraprim: Worth The Reward

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Martin Shkreli had increased the price of the drug Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 per tablet overnight. Daraprim ,treats a parasitic infection that is dangerous and potentially deadly for pregnant women, the elderly, and people with HIV. Martin says that he increased the price of Daraprim because he wanted to have a lot of money. Martin cannot be arrested or have any consequences because the overnight increase of a potentially life-saving drug by 5556%, appears to be perfectly legal Laws prohibiting price gouging tend only to apply to “periods of emergency,” such as natural disasters. Even though Martin had put his morals behind to get the reward of making more money he did not regret anything even though he is technically is murdering people who can not afford $750 will have to suffer and die because of this.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Well the reason for that is they need higher drug prices in order for them to have enough money for research. In some hospitals “ we often must pay deep money for medical research”. They make us pay so much more to help them find the research they need. They deduct us more for research to save others lives. Which you could look at that being a win win situation you get the drug which makes you feel better, and the money you spend on getting that drug can benefit another person because of the research they now can do.…

    • 2270 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Then Martin Shkreli claimed that the price increase was to help with the cost of researching. Which is absurd. Could you image if from one day to the next the medicine that you cannot live without had a price increase of 5,500 percent. That should not be allowed to happen to…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A drug named Daraprim price was raised by 5000%, from $13.50 to $750 per pill. Many cases similar to Daraprim have happened, and a pattern of massive price increase of many life saving drugs by pharmaceutical companies becomes apparent. Expensive drugs had forced patients to make difficult choices, either to cut down basic needs to save money to buy the needed drugs, or to cut down the use of the drugs itself. Americans start blaming drug companies of price gouging and call for drug prices regulation by government. Drug companies, on the other hand, blame health insurance companies for shifting the cost of purchasing drugs to patients.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Americans use more prescription drugs than any other developed country. Prescription drugs only represent 12 percent of total health care costs in the United States, but the rising prices of those drugs is an issue that keeps reoccurring not only for patients, but for prescribers, payers, and policy makers. There are people that believe that the rise in price of these drugs is appropriate, but if they keep on rising in price, the United States will start suffering not only financially but medically. Despite a lot of other aspects of the economy rising in price, pharmaceutical drugs should be lowered, or should at least be kept at a reasonable rate. The rise in prices of prescription drugs is an issue that does not seem to be going away…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obama Care Wrong

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The same sentiments should also apply in the case of pharmaceutical price gouging. Indeed, Obamacare should look into reducing drug prices to ensure its survival in the American health care system (Pipes, 29). According to Generic Drug Price Gouging Theory, drug prices in the domestic markets are skyrocketing compared to international markets. For instances, drugs prices in the American market rose 11% higher back in 2011 compared to Canadian, France and Switzerland market, mainly due to American greed and the supply and demand. Resultantly, millions of Americans go without drugs every day due to unaffordable drug prices (Marcovici,…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To have good will is to do one’s moral duty and to most people this comes naturally Immanuel Kant was a moral philosopher who believed that duty and rules come above all else. When discussing Kant theory on moral rules we find that he has no exception to the rule of lying. This does not change for any human depending on their social status. From a peasant to a king the outcome of breaking the rule will still be the same. Categorical imperative is an” unconditional moral obligation that is binding in all circumstances and is not dependent on a person's inclination or purpose”.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper will discuss an ethical evaluation using Kantian’s theory in a lying case stated below. What is Kantian’s theory? Kantian’s theory is an ethical theory that relies on the moral goodness of all people. “Kant argued that there is an unconditional good related to rationality, the moral law, and moral duty. The theory is centered on the duty to act based upon respect for the moral law or legitimate moral rules (104).”…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays