The Issue Of Killing Another Human Being By Don Marquis

Decent Essays
Don Marquis discusses in his article that killing another human being is wrong not because of what may happen to the victim’s family or friends, but because of the effect it has on the victim himself. Marquis goes on to say that killing is wrong because it takes away from the victim the opportunities that lie ahead. Furthermore, killing another person takes away all the things that the victim was valuing, or could value in the future. One might argue that killing may be moral if the victim does not value his or her own life. For example, many people suffering from depression do not value life, and do not believe that they could value life again in the future. Also, Marquis’s theory states that it is wrong to kill an actual being with a potential

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What do you think of when you hear “death sentence”? Probably someone being injected with lethal fluids and toxins with a sole purpose of immediate death. Another idea that might come to mind would be the classic electric chair. Somebody sitting there expressionless, waiting for the electric bolts to pulse through their body leading to a painful death. Maybe also a gas chamber, or hanging that was used in movies that take place many years ago.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Write an argumentative essay in which you convince an audience to support your claim about a debatable idea. Use your research and experience to support your argument. Psst, copy and paste your CBA here. Look at the checklist on pg.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No life holds any value over another, a set dollar value on someone’s life is surreal, and life should be valued regardless of whether or not one is suffering or have an illness. All lives have equal value, regardless of the individual's background or economic situation. In his second inaugural speech, George W. Bush spoke on how all people were created…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." Desmond Tutu said this and I could not agree more. I think that capital punishment is morality wrong, and that Walter Berns’ “The Morality of Capital Punishment” article in Exploring Ethics fails on many grounds. Berns uses anger and a politically correct government to advocate the use of capital punishment. I am going to try and prove that Burns is wrong, and that by killing we are only fueling the fire and a continuous cycle.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Regal T., 1985, p.35) Tom Regan believes that in terms of utilitarianism, such murder can be justified, so, he also rejects it as an inadequate theory. Regan eventually concludes that none of them can be correct, and offers the most satisfactory theory in his view, that is the rights view. (Regal T., 1985, p.36) This theory is based on the concept of intrinsic value. The author…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Killing someone or something isn’t simple enough to summarize to murder all the time. Under certain circumstances a person can excuse someone killing another person because it is necessary for one’s own survival. Under certain circumstances, one shouldn’t blame someone else for their actions because their decisions could ultimately save their lives and ensure their…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding physician assisted suicide, also known as PAS, J. David Velleman argues that a PAS policy could be harmful to patients and thus, we should not have a policy. In his work, “Against the Right to Die”, Velleman is not arguing for the morality of PAS, but rather against a PAS public policy. His argument focuses on the harm on a patient that PAS can have by adding the burden to opt for PAS. By giving more options, a PAS policy can push a patient to choose death. Without the option of PAS, Velleman says, a patient can continue to live by default.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When considering the permissibility of suicide, it becomes important to recognize a person’s reasoning for wanting to end their life. In David Velleman’s paper, A Right to Self-Termination, he explores what he considers to be flawed justification for suicide. Ultimately, Velleman claims that suicide cannot be justified by appealing to a person’s self interest, or to a persons right to make autonomous choices concerning their life. To support this claim, Velleman introduces two separate paradoxes. In order to understand these paradoxes, I will first offer a reconstruction of Velleman’s argument, and then introduce the paradoxes.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “When it comes to murder, you can’t respect grief. Or privacy. Or personal feelings” (85). The author uses the repetition of the word “or” to begin two sentences that effectively emphasize the sensitivity of the Clutters’ murder. Anaphora is used to appeal to the audience and generate a particular effect of understanding on them.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Homicide. Assassination. Serial Killer. Murderer. These words captivate american audiences generation after generation.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jon Krakauer’s “Death of an Innocent” appeared on the Independent’s website on 11 April 1993. Krakauer, an American writer and mountaineer, mainly known for his works about the outdoors, especially mountain climbing has produces yet another amazing news article among numerous others. This specific news article in fact have been the highlight of his writing career as it paved him to write his best-selling non-fiction books—Into the Wild. After reading “Death of an Innocent” by Krakauer, I have found myself left wondering of the perpetual psyche of Chris McCandless throughout his extreme odysseys. During my reading, I sense that Chris was not an ordinary person who lived according to the preprogrammed dogma of the society.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This asserts that the wrongness of killing drives from the unproblematic assumption that killing you or me is prima facie wrong. Furthermore, the reason killing you or me is wrong is because, as victims of death, we would assume the greatest possible loss of any conceivable crime. That is the loss of our future; our future holds every activity, project, experience, and enjoyment that we will ever have. Marquis continues that the…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays