Same Sex Marriage: The Future Of Gay Marriage

Improved Essays
The 1990’s were a spectacular time for many people. With pop culture exploding, feminism at a high, and many people settling down and starting a family, everything seemed perfect. However, others were not having the same joy, particularly the LGBT community. Many of them were still living in fear of rejection from society on coming out as gay as well as struggling for their right to marry. The fight for them was just beginning, but their battle would do much for the future of gay marriage. In fact, gay marriage changed from the pressure coming from people’s opinions on same-sex marriage, which prompted some states to change their laws, while others had chosen not to; the controversy caught the attention of the Supreme Court, and in time, was …show more content…
Individual’s opinions shaped and changed gay marriage legalization because without others opinions, the topic would not have reached the federal eye. Many opinions arose throughout the course for marriage equality. The main idea that guided the topic was being for gay marriage. This group believed that everyone should be offered equal marriage rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. They also wanted the same benefits as heterosexual couples, like Social Security. Another opinion was the opposition of gay marriage. These people believed that gay marriage disrupted religious beliefs because the bible stated that only a man and a woman could marry. People against same sex marriage also stated that a couple can only have sex if their intentions are to have a baby, but because same sex couples cannot do this, they are sinful. However, many shifted their opinion as the fight continued. According to a recent polling survey, in the year of 2003, 55% of the majority of American’s believed that same-sex couples should not be recognized under the law. In the same year only 37% of the majority believed that same-sex couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. In the year of 2013, the public’s belief had changed drastically. Now, 58% of the majority stated that they now supported gay marriage (“ABC News”). In 10 years, more than half of the population had changed their opinion on the topic. As the …show more content…
Furthermore, without people’s opinions shifting, there would have been no pressure on the federal government to change their marriage laws. With people’s opinions, came the need to change federal government laws. However, there was a long process to get even the first state legalization of same-sex marriage.
The beginning of government change began in 1993 when a case in Hawaii was brought forth saying that the state 's refusal of handing out marriage licenses in Hawaii broke the right of equal treatment. Hawaii then began handing out same sex licenses and caught the public 's eye. Since there were still many American’s who disagreed on same-sex marriage, they became frantic that same-sex couples would go to Hawaii to marry. In order to be certain this did not occur, Congress passed an act called The Defense of Marriage Act of 1996. This act stated that same-sex marriage would not have to be recognized in other states if their laws did not approve of it. The act also said that same-sex marriage would not be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1900s and 2000s? The year was 1958. The clock read 2 hours past midnight, July 11th. Richard and Mildred Loving woke up to the blaring noises of police cars outside the doors of their lovely Virginia home.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article by Faber and Strano (2015) details how leaders of some of the less supportive states felt after the decision. Arkansas and Texas officials were unsupportive of the legalizing of homosexual marriage. The Kentucky and Missouri officials were very supportive of the ruling. In this regard, the adversarial nature of this nation is exposed. In almost all aspects there are two sides,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On June 26, 2015 the United States Justices decided on a pivotal case in American history. In a close 5-4 vote the Justices deemed that same-sex marriage was constitutional via the 14th amendment. The Obergefell et al. v. Hodges case was the finality of a slow evolving progression for same-sex marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges). This landmark decision allowed same-sex marriage to be legal in the United States.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    13. Explain the Civil Rights Acts. United States courts and legislatures have a reciprocal reliance with each other. In order for a legislature to act, it requires constitutional authority. While courts require legislative/administrative support to utilize court orders and target political support.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court argued that prohibiting same-sex marriage was a violation of the Bill of Rights, therefore, it was unconstitutional. That decision required the states to comply with the ruling and changed their constitutions to allow same-sex marriages, even if they did not approved the ruling…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kim Davis A Villain

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kim Davis: Hero or Villain? When the Supreme Court decided to recognize the various marriages of same-sex couples nationwide on June 26, 2015, not everyone was applauding the significant event. While thousands of people across America flooded the streets with joy there were still those who believed allowing such marriages was against “God’s law,” and of those people was Kim Davis. Davis, a county clerk in Rowan, Kentucky, decided to “uphold “God’s law” by denying same-sex couples (and now all couples) marriage licenses.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same Sex Amendment Essay

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Back when settlers first came to the new world they were in search of religious freedom. No longer wanted to live under the rule of Great Britain, they left for the unknown. American was founded on the belief that once you become a U.S. citizen you are free. Although, the constitution was put in place to make sure that the “freedoms” do not get too out of hand. In today’s age some of these laws have restricted people from living the life that their ancestors risked their lives for.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008 Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics