The intro to his documentary states a very clear message: white people do not feel safe without their guns. The short 3-minute clip takes a South Park approach towards American history. It follows the pilgrims, slave owners, the KKK, and the NRA. Quoting the movie, it states, “and in 1871 the same year that the KKK became an illegal terrorist organization, another group was founded: the NRA… It was a great year for America the KKK and the NRA, of course they had nothing to do with each other, and this was just a coincidence…” (Bowling for Columbine) Just stating that, one should sustain a discredit to the entire movie as a source. It tends to insinuating that the KKK and the NRA are the same thing just under a different name. How can that even appear as a good argument? By that logic it makes me Mother Teresa, because I entered this world at the same time that she left it. To me it just does not make any sense, nor does it appear as a logical
The intro to his documentary states a very clear message: white people do not feel safe without their guns. The short 3-minute clip takes a South Park approach towards American history. It follows the pilgrims, slave owners, the KKK, and the NRA. Quoting the movie, it states, “and in 1871 the same year that the KKK became an illegal terrorist organization, another group was founded: the NRA… It was a great year for America the KKK and the NRA, of course they had nothing to do with each other, and this was just a coincidence…” (Bowling for Columbine) Just stating that, one should sustain a discredit to the entire movie as a source. It tends to insinuating that the KKK and the NRA are the same thing just under a different name. How can that even appear as a good argument? By that logic it makes me Mother Teresa, because I entered this world at the same time that she left it. To me it just does not make any sense, nor does it appear as a logical