The activist organization, known as the Islamic State, took control of the Mosul Dam, Kurdistan’s capital and the largest dam in Iraq, which provides the nation’s hydroelectricity (“Islamic State (ISIS)”). This action emerged worries that ISIS might rupture the dam and flood the encompassing territory (“Islamic State (ISIS)”). This threatens the global security in light of the fact that these dams collect rainwater, which can be used for irrigation and consumption; in storing water, they protect the water and the water table against depletion and reduce vulnerability to food and droughts, creating destabilization. Authorities contemplated that the Islamic State has come to ownership for weaponry (“Islamic State (ISIS)”), and demonstrated its enthusiasm and eagerness to sacrifice civilians who did not believe in its philosophies (Botelho 2014). The various techniques ISIS has demonstrated in carrying out genocides causes individuals to feel the danger, generating that sensation of threat globally and fearing tomorrow. Gregory III Laham stated “the militants destroyed the historic church in Tal Hurmiz, one of the oldest in Syria” (“ISIS Believed to Have Hundreds”). Furthermore, a video was released in the press depicting a group …show more content…
The Islamic State has a past loaded with executing captives, including foreign journalists, soldiers, children, and recently released a video featuring the beheading of twenty-one innocent Christians (“ISIS Believed to Have”). ISIS is a ruthless group, attempting to establish extremist’s inhuman theocracies and neglecting all obligations and morals, leaving innocent people and moderates in the hands of fanatics is promoting humanitarian crisis. Charles Krauthammer claimed in the National Review that ISIS “proudly crucify enemies, enslave women, and murder men [altogether] … these are primitive cultists who celebrate slaughter, glory in bloodlust, and slit the throats of innocents as a kind of sacrament” (“Islamic State (ISIS)”). The Islamic State has a reputation of torturous killings, stoning, crucifying, and slaughtering minorities, Christians and Muslims who do not endorse its strict translation of Islam (Botelho 2014). Withstanding to its critical threat to the health, safety, and security, they constrained what ladies can wear, where they can go, sold them to slavery, and obliged them to marry ISIS fighters (“Islamic State (ISIS)”). A write of a book on IS, Hassan said, “by killing Christians civilians, they are [conveying] a message that they are expanding” (“Islamic State Lays Claim”); in this manner, these non-ethical human crises of torturing