• Home Page
  • The Irresistible Impulse Test For Legal Insanity

The Irresistible Impulse Test For Legal Insanity

Improved Essays
Show More
Introduction

What is Insanity Defense?

Normally, a person is only convicted of crime if the prosecution proves that the suspect is engaged in a guilty act or had any guilty intent. If the suspect is not confirmed to have such intents, then it’s not considered as a crime. However, in situations in which a person commits a crime with intent, but suffers from a mental or physical condition that hinders their ability to control their behavior or to distinguish what’s right or wrong is involved, the people responsible of judging these cases have to consider insanity defense.

How Courts Test for Legal Insanity

Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use one or a combination of four tests for legal insanity, which are, the M’Naghten Rule”, the “Irresistible Impulse “ Test, the ”Durham Rule” and the “Model Penal Code” Test for Legal Insanity. …show more content…
Third, the “Durham Rule” is a rule where regardless of any diagnosis the defendants’ "mental deficiency" resulted into a criminal act. Lastly, The “Model Penal Code” Test for Legal Insanity in which on account of a diagnosed mental defect, defendants have failed to either understand the misconduct of their criminal actions or were unable to act within the boundaries of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Andrea Pia Kennedy Yates Case Study
    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrea Pia Kennedy Yates Case Study

    After the guilty verdict, but before sentencing, the State abandoned its request for the death penalty in light of false testimony by one of its expert psychiatric witnesses. In2002 she went to trial and she was sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 40 years. The verdict was overturned on appeal. Her case placed the M'Naghten Rules with the Irresistible Impulse Test, a legal test for sanity, under close public scrutiny in the United States. In order to rules a case under the M'naghten rules there;s have to be clean proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason , from the disease of the mind , as not to know the nature and quality of the act, the party accused was doing or if he did know it , that he did not know what was wrong ..…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hearst To Hughes: Rhetorical Analysis
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hearst To Hughes: Rhetorical Analysis

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay
    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    Serial Killers Essay

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    High Court Review Insanity-Defense Case Summary
    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    High Court Review Insanity-Defense Case Summary

    Have you ever wondered why people have not pleaded guilty for a crime that they committed? According to the article, High Court Reviews Insanity-Defense Case, we can argue to ways in which we either believe that insanity plea should be allowed in the court or not. This article was written and debated in 2006. The author is Nina Totenberg. This article is about Eric Clark and how he pleaded in the court of Arizona.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Sociopathy Vs Psychopathy
    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sociopathy Vs Psychopathy

    The problem associated with this is that fact that because of this the standards to claim insanity were easier to do with the DSM than by the PCL-R. The DSM is what is more commonly used in Frye Jurisdictions. This evidence shows the unequal advantage of how the simplicity of what jurisdiction and individual is in can show significant impact on…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Competent To Stand Trial Analysis
    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Competent To Stand Trial Analysis

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Plea Research Paper
    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Insanity Plea Research Paper

    “You must plead insanity. You must give the jury a way out. You must show them a way to find him not guilty if they are so inclined. If they’re sympathetic, if they want to acquit, you must provide them with a defense they can use to do it. It makes no difference if they believe the insanity crap.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity Verdicts Essay
    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not Guilty By Reason Of Insanity Verdicts Essay

    This verdict can often be mistaken for the defence of diminished responsibility / capacity despite there being many major differences between the two. Although both are there to be used by mentally ill defendants, reason of insanity is a full defense to a crime and diminished responsibility / capacity is not. Pleading not guilty by reason of insanity is essentially equivalent to pleading not guilty, diminished responsibility / capacity is however just the defendant pleading to a lesser crime, the fact they are mentally ill is used as a mitigating factor. The law presumes that every person has free will, is responsible for their actions and should therefore be punished in accordance with the seriousness of their crime.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of The Insanity Defense
    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of The Insanity Defense

    There are many experts that have explored the idea of how the Insanity Defense could be “fixed” for the public to agree with. Richard Bonnie, a professor of public policy, law and medicine at the University of Virginia, has came to the theory that the insanity defense should not be abolished but should be narrowed. He came to the conclusion that the criteria of what qualifies for “Insanity”, by narrowing the criteria, it will help persuade the public that the insanity defense is not harmful for the overall public, but it is a healthier outcome. Another way to help the public agree is to inform the public what actually happens in these court cases, and help sort out the…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Importance Of The Insanity Plea
    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of The Insanity Plea

    The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense History
    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Insanity Defense History

    For centuries, criminals have been categorized as insane, but does that justify their crime? The majority of higher profile criminals file for the insanity plea which then affects their punishment and life, causing us to consider if ours is safe. The insanity defense should not be admissible in court because of the interest for the public, increases in legal costs, and manipulation of the legal system. The insanity defense’s history plays into our everyday legal actions and in order to understand the problem, you need to understand the defense.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Tell Tale Heart Insanity Essay
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Tell Tale Heart Insanity Essay

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments Against The Insanity Defense
    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Arguments Against The Insanity Defense

    Jrank also point out that most of the cases that go very public have to deal with murders. This leads the public to think the defense is mostly used to get out of murders when in fact; sixty to seventy percent of cases deal with other crimes ranging from assault to shoplifting. As of today 46 of our 50 states have some form of insanity defense, of these 46 there are 45 that base insanity on either the M’Naghten Rule or the MPC Test (Cevallos 1). Cevallos also says that the absence of some form of the insanity defense is unconstitutional. This concept has caused many states that were torn between keeping and getting rid of the insanity plea to keep…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Torry And Billick: The Insanity Defense
    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Torry And Billick: The Insanity Defense

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    A Crime Of Insanity Article Analysis
    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Crime Of Insanity Article Analysis

    The article on A Crime of Insanity (Frontline, 2002), describes the whole process of determining the causes of action for individuals who have a mental illness at the time of committing heinous crimes. This article, in particular, covers the story of Ralph Tortorici, who has a history of mental disorder from as early as his adolescent years. Moreover, Ralph suffers from regular acute paranoid delusions and psychotic behavior, which prompted him to seek help from the University health facility and also from a New York state trooper. On both occasions, he complains of a government conspiracy which he feels is responsible for implanting a computer microchip on him. Having failed to secure any help from anyone, he takes matters into his own hands…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings